Bug#380586: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reportsMachine: x86 desktopProcessor: AMD Athron 2500+Memory: 256m DDRPartitions:   IDE : Maxtor 6E040L0              SATA : WD800JD-00LSA0                     10G Fedora Core 4                   40G    backup data                  rest   ready to r

Bug#380588: INTL:vi

Package: installation-guide Version: Severity: minor Tags: l10n Here are some possible errors (getting harder to find ;) ) I've encountered in the original strings while reviewing my translation of the Guide. I hope they are useful. _ partitioning.po 1. .po:1345 auto:

Bug#369793: marked as done (installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full)

Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:28:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

On Monday 31 July 2006 03:20, Steve Langasek wrote: > He did request approval for this transition on debian-release earlier > in the month, and there were no objections raised: > /me kicks himself for missing the implications of that m

Re: Not very happy with new directfb upload

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 04:01:04PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > I do not want to blame you or anything, but I do need your help to get > things sorted out. > You uploaded a new upstream version of directfb a few days ago (or rather, > it was accepted a few days ago), and I'm afraid that looks like

Bug#380579: (no subject)

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: uname -a: < Linux osprey.cowpie 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux > Da

Processed: severity of 380187 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > # requests for specific hardware support are important, unless overridden to > serious > severity 380187 important Bug#380187: debian-boot: fails to initialise platinumfb-driver bas

Bug#369793: installation-reports: net-retriever unable to fetch hw-detect-full

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:18 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:13:18PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Package: installation-reports > > Severity: critical > > Justification: breaks the whole system > > > > Boot method: USB stick > > Image version: stable (Sarge) > >

NEW:

too many blogs page down find details valuable savings offers Printers Epson Notebooks Laser Black White Color LCDs Now Problems Help Live Techs Available Click todays deals wireless Cingular Solutions Cell amusing Junkyard Bryan seem be doing much than it. Is useful exercise activi

Bug#380543: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:55:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380543: Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

localechooser_1.22_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: localechooser_1.22.dsc to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.22.dsc localechooser_1.22.tar.gz to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.22.tar.gz localechooser_1.22_all.udeb to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_1.22_all.udeb Override entries for your package: loca

Bug#380543: Package: installation-reports

On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:06, Pete Taphouse wrote: > The machine was installed remotely over the serial line, and > though it mostly works when you try and install lilo from the menu it > has a syntax error in the serial line that it sticks in the lilo.conf > file which causes the installation stag

Bug#380543: Fwd: Re: Bug#380543: Package: installation-reports

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#380543: Package: installation-reports Date: Sunday 30 July 2006 23:03 From: Peter Taphouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Frans, > What exactly did you enter at the boot prompt to make it install / boot > over s

Bug#380543: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Boot method: tftp network boot , etch daily build (and beta2 too) Image version: 2006-07-30 daily build Date: 2006-07-30 Machine: Hand built machine Processor: Sempron64 2800 (in 32bit mode) Memory: 512MB Partitions: df -T FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used

[D-I] Preparing for update in stable - resumed (was: 3.1r3 lkdi status)

On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:00, dann frazier wrote: > Here's the status of the lkdi rebuilds for 3.1r3. Now that we are really getting closer, I propose to upload base-installer to stable (proposed-updates) so it can be autobuilt. The reason it needs to be updated is that otherwise kernel selection

Bug#380093: Debian branding

On 30/07/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 02:49:53PM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > It would be nice if this text were more generic so that derived > > distributions didn't have to mess with it. How about "only the core of > > your new sys

Processing of localechooser_1.22_i386.changes

localechooser_1.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: localechooser_1.22.dsc localechooser_1.22.tar.gz localechooser_1.22_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Processing of linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge2_sparc.changes

linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge2_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge2.dsc linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge2.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge2_sparc.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge2_s

Bug#380093: Debian branding

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 02:49:53PM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > It would be nice if this text were more generic so that derived > > distributions didn't have to mess with it. How about "only the core of > > your new system is installed" and "Software selection"? > > May I

Processing of linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge2_powerpc.changes

linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge2.dsc linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge2.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-powerpc-di_0.78sarge2_powerpc.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-powerpc-di_0.

Processing of linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge2_ia64.changes

linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge2_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge2.dsc linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge2.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge2_ia64.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge2_ia6

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge4_i386.changes

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge4.dsc linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge4.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i386.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge4_i386.udeb ni

Processing of linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge2_hppa.changes

linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge2_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge2.dsc linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge2.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge2_hppa.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge2_hppa.udeb ppp-modul

Re: Plans for GTK+ - update

On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:37, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Sorry for the very long delay. I've uploaded new gtk+2.0 packages to > unstable, with different names as planned. They are also rebuilt > against DirectFB 0.9.25. > > They are currently sitting in NEW, but NEW processing is very fast > these d

Re: Plans for GTK+ - update

Le mercredi 05 juillet 2006 à 21:05 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit : > This means that we can easily determine when to make the switch ourselves > by setting the correct build dependencies. > > Hmm. Both the lib and -dev package probably still install the same files > as the current gtk+2.0-directfb p

[D-I Manual] Build log for en (30 Jul 2006)

A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN. There were no errors during the build process. The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully. A log of the build is available at: - http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log === It is possible to u

Processed: Mark pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 378404 + pending Bug#378404: installation-guide Tags were: l10n Tags added: pending > tags 370484 + pending Bug#370484: installation-guide There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 370425 + pending Bug#370425: installation-guide There we

Bug#370484: installation-guide

Most suggestions applied, some comments below. On Monday 05 June 2006 15:39, Clytie Siddall wrote: > Original: ⌘0 Or, you can use the following procedure to install it > manually. Make a work folder for extracting the .deb into: > \n > # mkdir work\n > # cd work\n > > - Make a work folder

Bug#358001: partman: please create ext3 file systems with online resize support

On Sunday 30 July 2006 11:01, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Is there enough time before the release to get some code like this > added to partman-ext3: Sorry, but I'm not going to make a change like this in the last week before release. pgpj391P5prs3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#358001: partman: please create ext3 file systems with online resize support

The ext2resize udeb is now available in unstable. It only contain /sbin/ext2prepare program. Is there enough time before the release to get some code like this added to partman-ext3: if [ -x /sbin/ext2prepare ] ; then /sbin/ext2prepare $device fi Or perhaps let it depend on ext2resize