On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:00:11 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:36:41PM +0300, Eddy Petri?or wrote:
>> Please submit an bug against the installation-reports meta package.
>> (Hint: using reportbug will allow to generate a proper installation
>> report).
>
>Al
If I debootstrap etch, I get a chroot with /etc/shadow. So something
strange is going on if this doesn't happen in the system debootstrapped
by d-i.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Frans Pop wrote:
> Because user-setup-apply is only run during finish-install, shadow
> passwords are not enabled during pkgsel. This leads to the following
> errors (that are in themselves not harmfull as they are ignored, just
> ugly) in the syslog:
passwd.postinst contains this:
# Run shado
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 377974 -1
Bug#377974: exim4-config fails with awk; line 21 syntax error on arm
Bug 377974 cloned as bug 379875.
> reassign -1 user-setup 1.3
Bug#379875: exim4-config fails with awk; line 21 syntax error on arm
Bug reassigned from package `install
clone 377974 -1
reassign -1 user-setup 1.3
retitle -1 Should shadow passwords be enabled earlier?
severity -1 minor
thanks
Because user-setup-apply is only run during finish-install, shadow
passwords are not enabled during pkgsel. This leads to the following
errors (that are in themselves not ha
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:22, you wrote:
> I had send this message but it came back undeliverable. So I send it
> straight to you.
Strange. Should work.
> There's already a line 'set -e' at the top of the file, so my question
> is: You mean to add 'set -x' to get:
> Or should I change the 'set -
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:37:48 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug was caused by mixed fonts used in the G-I environment
in Extremadura
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 379628 -1
Bug#379628: ntfsresize: resizing a Vista NTFS partition leads to corrupted
partition
Bug 379628 cloned as bug 379835.
> reassign -1 partman-partitioning 40
Bug#379835: ntfsresize: resizing a Vista NTFS partition leads to corrupted
par
clone 379628 -1
reassign -1 partman-partitioning 40
retitle -1 NTFS (partition) not recreated correctly after resize:incorrect
start sector
severity -1 grave
tags -1 - d-i
thanks
As can be seen in the bug history, partman needs to create the new
smaller/larger partition with the same start sector
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:53:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379526: papersize is a4 for US install - should be letter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
> So separate executable and po-files during udeb build
> and retrieve the po data for the wanted language.
This is the iea behind "language packs". Noone actually came with
implementation ideas but that should be discussed at the Extremadura
i18n meeting in September (though not officially the m
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:36:41PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Please submit an bug against the installation-reports meta package.
> (Hint: using reportbug will allow to generate a proper installation
> report).
All of these bug reports are already mentioned, with regard to the IBM JS21
blades.
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: from iso in parallels virtualization
Image version: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso, daily snapshot of
July 25, 2006
Date: July 25. 2006, 11:00 EST
Machine: MacBook Pro under Parallells Build 1848
Processor: 2 GHz Intel Core Duo
Memory: 512 MB virtua
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 14:27]:
> > Scott has a nice script that converts the fstab,
> > that will of course only work with initramfs-tools.
>
> Any idea where this script will be included so applicatio
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 14:27]:
> Scott has a nice script that converts the fstab,
> that will of course only work with initramfs-tools.
Any idea where this script will be included so applications can use
it?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 360619 base-installer
Bug#360619: Installer numbers SCSI drives diffently than the post install
system does on Dell PE1855 (Debian 3.1r1)
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `base-installer'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 379197
Bug#379197: debian-installer: etch d-i mistakenly installed pbuttonsd even
though i do not have a mac laptop
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened
reopen 379197
thanks
Although pbbuttonsd is now installed by hw-detect, it is still being
installed in tasksel. This report should only be closed when it has been
removed from the laptop task in tasksel.
Therefore reopening (and leaving assigned to tasksel).
pgpM26naMXZmg.pgp
Description: PGP
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 04:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379197: fixed in hw-detect 1.39
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
os-prober_1.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.13.dsc
os-prober_1.13.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.13_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.13_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
hw-detect_1.39_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.39.dsc
hw-detect_1.39.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.39_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.39_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.39_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.39_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUB
apt-setup_0.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.13.dsc
apt-setup_0.13.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.13_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.13_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.13_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
archdetect_1.39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.39_i386.udeb
disk-detect_1.39_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.39_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.39_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.39_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.39.dsc
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-detect
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.13_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.13_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.13_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.13_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.13.dsc
to poo
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.13_i386.udeb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.13_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.13.dsc
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.13.dsc
os-prober_1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.13.tar.gz
os-prober_1.13_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.13
Hit the same bug yesterday.
Debian 3.1 r1a, bought on DVDs. Pentium 4 2.40GHz,
1Gb RAM, ST Lab A162 PCI ATA 133 IDE controller,
two Seagate Barracuda ST3250823A 250 Gb HDDs.
Attempts to enable any kind of quotas for XFS mounted
as the root file system resulted in it being mounted ro.
Passing th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379688 moreinfo
Bug#379688: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:52:03AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> D-I memory usage
>
> One of the main issues with this release is increased memory usage. For
> some arches this is proving critical as e.g. 32 or 64 MB boundaries are
> cro
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 08:59:01PM -0300, facundo wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
Thank you for your feedback.
> Comments/Problems:
>
> a) did not reboot, but switching off and then on it all started ok
Please tell more about the "did not reboot".
Now that computer is installed. Does
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:33:36AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > severity 379637 wishlist
> Bug#379637: Package: installation-reports
> Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
IMHO was the installation succesfull and could this BR be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379637 wishlist
Bug#379637: Package: installation-reports
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
32 matches
Mail list logo
