Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: localechooser
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> when locale variables had been moved from /etc/environment into
> /etc/default/locale, Christian and I agreed on letting
> localechooser create both files until most programs have been
> modified in
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
2) However, strangely, the "lspci" command seems to be missing
from the installed system. I *was* able to get it (as part of the
"pciutils" package) from the mirror via aptitude. So it's not
missing completely.
Interestingly... I had or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 379074 installation-reports
Bug#379074: Installation Fail- Please help!
Warning: Unknown package 'method'
Warning: Unknown package 'floppyimage'
Warning: Unknown package 'version'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package 'gnu'
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [o]
Detect network card:[o]
Configure network: [o]
Detect CD: [o]
Load installer modules: [o]
De
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
booted from daily businesscard CD
Image version:
| Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd
| NameLast
modified Size
|
| Parent
Directory
On Friday 21 July 2006 01:38, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I'm curious... On the cdimage.d.o server there seem to be two
> parallel series of daily-build debian-installer cd images. They are
> clearly different, but why?
There are three actually, you missed sid_d-i to which daily is currently
linked. T
I'm curious... On the cdimage.d.o server there seem to be two
parallel series of daily-build debian-installer cd images. They are
clearly different, but why?
Enjoy!
Rick
==
Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd
Name
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Debian-installer keeps growing, which makes installing on low-ram
machines harder as time goes by. Sometimes such growth is necessary; in
other cases, the memory footprint grows to add features which admittedly
are nice, but aren't required for eve
Package: localechooser
Severity: normal
Hi,
when locale variables had been moved from /etc/environment into
/etc/default/locale, Christian and I agreed on letting
localechooser create both files until most programs have been
modified in testing. I believe that this is done now, so
localechooser
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> - prereqs mechanism:
> uses costly boot time and there is no easy solution to be first
> nor to be last. proposed solution is to remove it plainly.
> (scripts that don't use wouldn't be affected, as prereqs only
> enters in the game if you invoke t
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.ude
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:19:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292966: installation-reports: No /etc/network/interfaces
using etch beta 2 installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: tasksel
Version: 0.9.7.1
Severity: important
During a new installation the following language tasks are shown for
selection by the user: Finnish, Galician, Icelandic, Irish, Macedonian,
Portuguese, Slovenian, Welsh.
Please upload a fixed version with increased severity as this should b
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 20 July 2006 13:23, maximilian attems wrote:
>> please apply belows patch, to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid.
>
> There was a short discussion about this on IRC.
>
> Kamion: What do you think of #378984?
> fjp: suspicious of noexec, ar
Em Sábado 17 Junho 2006 16:52, você escreveu:
> Tiago Saboga wrote:
> > The system does not have a /etc/network/interfaces file, and though no
> > loopback device activated. Nothing wrong happened during install, and I
> > only noticed it two weeks later when configuring pppoe.
>
> I take it that y
On Thursday 20 July 2006 13:23, maximilian attems wrote:
> please apply belows patch, to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid.
There was a short discussion about this on IRC.
Kamion: What do you think of #378984?
fjp: suspicious of noexec, aren't there symlinks to executables
in /proc? dunn
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:03:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378971: package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Thursday 20 July 2006 11:37, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:23:13PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > --- partman-crypto.xml 2006-07-09 21:21:07.0 +0200
> > +++ partman-crypto.xml.workingcopy 2006-07-18
> >
> > -First, let's have a look at available options avail
maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: partman-target
> Version: 44
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> please apply belows patch,
> to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid.
>
> rationale:
> setuid and setgid bits have nothing lost in /proc, nice workaround
> for kernel /proc vulnerability, see
Package: partman-target
Version: 44
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
please apply belows patch,
to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid.
rationale:
setuid and setgid bits have nothing lost in /proc, nice workaround
for kernel /proc vulnerability, see suggested at the lwn.net article:
http://lwn.ne
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
ext3-modu
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.16-2-
Frans Pop wrote :
> I seriously doubt you are using the busybox-udeb with that version when
> building the installer's initrd. Check your /var/lib/dpkg/status file.
> The -k option _is_ supported in busybox-udeb 1.1.3-2.
Yes, sorry, i checked it yesterday evening.
Our initrd image was build with t
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:05:45PM -0700, brian wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: July 18 download netinstall.iso at
> debian.org daily builds etch
> (time approx 4pm pdt)
> Date: July 18 -19 evening/ overnight pdt
>
> Machine: powerpc, powerbook3
On 20/07/06, Mark Pictor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something else: extended partitions aren't supposed to be
bootable, are they? Yet sda7 was set to boot, and it is extended,
not primary. sounds like a bug to me...
You are confusing logical partitions with extended partitions. The
later typ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:23:13PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> --- partman-crypto.xml2006-07-09 21:21:07.0 +0200
> +++ partman-crypto.xml.workingcopy2006-07-18
>
> -First, let's have a look at available options available when y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Retitle 378954 d-i: base-install fails on Pismo Powerbook
Bug#378954: Installation Report
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.4_mips.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.16-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.4_mips.udeb
loop-modules-2.6.16-2-r4k-
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb
reiserfs-modu
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.4_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.1
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.
Hello,
I have a problem after i flashed for the last time using this manual:
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/
After is flashed "debian-sda1.bin", I shutdown the power and connect my
usb harddisk. When I power my nslu2 the only green led (also after some
couple of hours) i see is the transfer l
Package: installation-reports
Original message at bottom, for reference. This is a followup to
an erroneus installation-report I made regarding the netinst cd for
etch (installer beta2).
--
Update: the problem was that no partition was set as boot
partition. T
33 matches
Mail list logo
