Hire,
i am here saitting in !!the int!ernet ca!ffe.a Found your email and
decided to write. I might be coming to your place in 14 days,
so I adecided to em!ail you. May be we can meet? I am 25 y.o.
girl. I have a pict!ure if you awant. No need to reply here as
this is not my email. Write me at [E
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
pp
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.04sarge2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.04sarge2.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386_1.04sarge2.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-386-di_1.04sarge2_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-386-di_1.04sarge2_i386.udeb
nic-extra-mod
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.64sarge1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.64sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.64sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.64sarge1_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.64sarge1_power
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.65sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.65sarge1_m68k.udeb
pp
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6_0.66sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_
linux-kernel-di-mipsel_1.1sarge1_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mipsel_1.1sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mipsel_1.1sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-r3k-kn02-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.4.27-r3k-kn02-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb
linux-kernel-di-mips_1.2sarge1_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mips_1.2sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mips_1.2sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-r4k-ip22-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb
ppp-modules-2.4.27-r4k-ip22-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb
loop-modules
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_0.05sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge1_s
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.64sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.78sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-powerpc-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-3-powerpc-di_0.
linux-kernel-di-s390_0.61sarge1_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390_0.61sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-s390_0.61sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb
scsi-core-m
linux-kernel-di-ia64_1.00sarge1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64_1.00sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64_1.00sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.7_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.7.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.7.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.1sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia6
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge2.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.02sarge2.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge2_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-3-386-di_1.02sarge2_i386.udeb
ni
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.1sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb
ppp-modul
linux-kernel-di-arm_1.0sarge1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-arm_1.0sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-arm_1.0sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-netwinder-di_1.0sarge1_arm.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-netwinder-di_1.0sarge1_arm.udeb
nic-extra-module
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.65sarge1_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.65sarge1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.65sarge1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Package: apt-setup
> Severity: normal
>
> Quoting Sinusop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hi,
> > I downloaded and burned the daily
> > ''debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso'' and made an expert installation.
> > I answered 'no' when it asked if I wanted to use non-free packa
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_
(new) fat-modules-2.6.8-amiga-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb extra debian-installer
FAT filesystem support
This package contains the FAT and VFAT filesystem modules for the Linux kernel.
(new) fat-modules-2.6.8-atari-di_0.66sarge1_m68k.udeb extra debian-installer
FAT filesystem support
This package cont
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 20:06]:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> > their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> > to produce a release.
> >
> > In the next
On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> to produce a release.
>
> In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be released.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc32-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-sparc64-di_0.64sarge1_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package conta
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
usb-storage-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.2sarge1_mips.udeb: package says
priority is standard, override says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
(new) kernel-image-2.4.27-3-s390-di_0.61sarge1_s390.udeb extra debian-installer
Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer
This package contains the Linux kernel image for the Debian installer
boot images. It does _not_ provide a usable kernel for your full
Debian system.
(new) kernel-im
(new) acpi-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb extra debian-installer
ACPI support modules
This package contains linux kernel modules for ACPI.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp-di_1.7_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM suppor
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-32-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-64-di_1.1sarge1_hppa.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM s
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
usb-storage-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_1.1sarge1_mipsel.udeb: package says
priority is standard, override says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you thi
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) ext3-modules-2.6.8-3-itanium-smp-di_1.1sarge1_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
EXT3 filesystem support
This package
(new) affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power3-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb extra
debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package contains the Amiga filesystem module for the Linux kernel.
(new) affs-modules-2.6.8-3-power4-di_0.78sarge1_powerpc.udeb extra
debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc32-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-3-sparc64-di_0.05sarge1_sparc.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Following a decision that happened around Debconf, Attilio Fiandrotti
> and Eddy Petrişor have produced a patch that backports DirectFB supports
> into GTK+ 2.8.18 (the current version in unstable) without affecting the
> X11
(new) brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb extra
debian-installer
Braille support
This package contains Braille drivers for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-itanium-smp-di_1.00sarge1_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contain
(new) brltty-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb extra
debian-installer
Braille support
This package contains Braille drivers for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-3-generic-di_0.65sarge1_alpha.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core
There are some news about GTK+ packages, and this relates to both GNOME
and the debian-installer. I'll try to sum them up here. Please note that
this is only a proposal, which is meant to be discussed.
I. The past
Until now, the graphical installer has been using a specially patched
GTK+ version,
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I've build the image with gtk 2.8.18...and it crashes.
A friend tested the PPC mini ISO on a minimac and he had to boot with
video=ofonly to prevent the installer from crashing, and colours were
messed up as usual.
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:42:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 375499 + fixed
Bug#375499: rootskel: Add support for IBM POWER serial console.
Tags were: pending d-i patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
tag 375499 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:23:24 +0200
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel-bootfloppy rootskel
Architecture
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.33_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.33_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.33.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.33.dsc
rootskel_1.33.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.33.tar.gz
rootskel_1.33_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.3
rootskel_1.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.33.dsc
rootskel_1.33.tar.gz
rootskel_1.33_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.33_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Will try and remember to test this on Monday.
By the way having a quick look at the diff I notice the comment:
+ # It would be a lot easier to parse the /sys/block/*/device
+ # symlink. Unfortunately, unlike other block devices, this
+ # doesn't seem to exist in this
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Sadness is filling my body as I have seen yet another G-I on powerpc :((
On 29/06/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ok, there is no hurry: i was just curious to know wheter some ppc
bugs
> >> were
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:05:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since this warning note has been added specifically because the xserver is
> being removed in situations we don't want it to, and the removal is being
> caused by a new package that didn't exist in sarge, it is indeed very
> difficul
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2006 05:02:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376001: fixed in partman-base 89
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2006 05:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375928: fixed in base-installer 1.61
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
partman-base_89_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_89.dsc
partman-base_89.tar.gz
partman-base_89_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
base-installer_1.61_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.61.dsc
base-installer_1.61.tar.gz
base-installer_1.61_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
finish-install_2.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
finish-install_2.3.dsc
finish-install_2.3.tar.gz
finish-install_2.3_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Accepted:
base-installer_1.61.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.61.dsc
base-installer_1.61.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.61.tar.gz
base-installer_1.61_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.61_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
On Friday 30 June 2006 13:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> DVD-ROM is not recognized with 2.6 kernel
Please check if the information on this page helps you:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SataAtapiHowto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
partman-base_89.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_89.dsc
partman-base_89.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_89.tar.gz
partman-base_89_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_89_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing
Accepted:
finish-install_2.3.dsc
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.3.dsc
finish-install_2.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.3.tar.gz
finish-install_2.3_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.3_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lis
On Thursday 29 June 2006 17:24, Alex Owen wrote:
> analysis on IRC showed that humandev function is missing support for
> /dev/cciss/c0d0 devices.
>
> discovered in netboot daily image 20060628 on an HP DL380
We have just uploaded a new version of the program that caused this
problem. It should b
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:10PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> >> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> >> same place.
>
> Note that I ran a session with video=ofonly which also
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 06/28/2006
Date: 06/29/2006
Machine: IBM Thinkpad Z60m 2529/FKG
Processor: Intel Centrino 2 Ghz
Memory: 1 Gb
Partitions: / /home /var /tmp swap
Output of lspci and lspci -n: na
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error
On 30/06/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
> same place.
Note that I ran a session with video=ofonly which also crashed, but I
didn't made a trace.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-parisc-di_1.9_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-parisc-di_1.9_hppa.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-parisc64-di_1.9_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-parisc64-di_1.9_
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.2_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.2_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.2_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_0.9_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_0.9_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-s3c2410-di_0.9_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-s3c2410-di_0.9
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
I also added a strace for a regular (no video=ofonly) session at the
same place.
I looked at both dfb and strace logs and this could be bug #342053 :
have you tried booting with the textual frontend, adding "no-hardware"
to directfbrc and then starting the graphical fr
64 matches
Mail list logo
