On Saturday 13 May 2006 23:23, Frans Pop wrote:
> Yesterday Joey and I discussed the integration of the graphical
> installer into the regular build system, and the result is below for
> wider discussion and comments.
Yesterday Joey and I managed to do the integration for i386.
This means that we
On 5/15/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 07:22, Frans Pop wrote:
> It's currently unsure if the keyboard will work correctly with AT
> keymaps as well as USB-MAC. I'll test that over the next days.
The current daily images now show the AT keymap list. I've tested th
On Sunday 14 May 2006 07:22, Frans Pop wrote:
> It's currently unsure if the keyboard will work correctly with AT
> keymaps as well as USB-MAC. I'll test that over the next days.
The current daily images now show the AT keymap list. I've tested this on
Frank Lichtenheld's Powerbook G4 laptop, and
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Does that mean the that cases there are largely irrelevant? I mean pump
> doesn't appear to support setting that vendor-class-identifier option...
Yes, we've only used the dhcp 2 client for quite a while, dhcp
preseeding came long after we used anything else, and will need
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 21:03:27 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Solve in current images
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 21:01:36 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Still reproducable?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 21:01:36 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Still reproducable?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 20:57:43 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current images of installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 360578 + patch
Bug#360578: busybox: passwd uses null salt (weak encryption) [CVE-2006-1058]
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On 5/14/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.26
It appears that kbd-chooser does not actually detect ADB keyboards as used
for example on Powerbook G4 laptops.
Until Beta 2 keyboard selection only worked because of the default mac-usb
keyboard added in usb-kbd
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 18:52:25 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed in current installer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:00:59PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:33:08AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been meaning to do this for probably a year, but I've finally gotten
> > around to actually looking into what is involved in using ipconfig in n
Hi,
I've installed debian etch without debian-installer or any CD
image.
The fact that debian-installer ("base-config") is now execute during
the first installation part before the reboot, and that there is not
anymore "base-config" or similar in the repository force me to do a
manual install
Hello,
We are trying to figure out which bugs were solved in GRUB in sid and
testing since the release of sarge and since your bug report is very
old would be good if you could test if it still reproducable in
current beta2 or snapshot d-i images?
Images: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-instal
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 14:02:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365747: fixed in base-installer 1.57
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Geert Stappers schrieb:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
So... what I'm really after is a way to skip all the boot machinery in
debian-installer. It should still do everything else (hardware
detection, partitioning, base configuration, package installation, and
Hello all,
I have some good news regarding ppp-udeb and PPPoE. As the subject
says, I have managed to conduct an installation over PPPoE using the
patched ppp-udeb I have created and a customized image[1].
The good news:
- the pppoe connection was configured and packages were downloaded
from the
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:15:00PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:59:05PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a short status update on the progress of adding dm-crypt support
to partman-crypto.
The support is now at a stage where it is possible to perform a fu
Accepted:
base-installer_1.57.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.57.dsc
base-installer_1.57.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.57.tar.gz
base-installer_1.57_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.57_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:59:05PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a short status update on the progress of adding dm-crypt support
> to partman-crypto.
>
> The support is now at a stage where it is possible to perform a full
> crypto-on-root installation and to boot into the
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:33:08AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been meaning to do this for probably a year, but I've finally gotten
> around to actually looking into what is involved in using ipconfig in netcfg
> as a replacement to dhcp-client, so we can get rid of DHCPv2 altog
base-installer_1.57_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.57.dsc
base-installer_1.57.tar.gz
base-installer_1.57_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Hi all,
Here's a short status update on the progress of adding dm-crypt support
to partman-crypto.
The support is now at a stage where it is possible to perform a full
crypto-on-root installation and to boot into the newly installed
system.
This depends on:
o partman-crypto built from SVN
Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
A bit of history for reference can be found in bug #340935 .
If the interface set up should be brought up upon detection by a
hotplugging mechanism, netcfg inserts the following clause into the
generated /etc/network/interfaces file:
# This is a list of hotplug
On 5/14/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not really completely fond of these names, mostly because I find
> > them hard to type on non US keyboards.
> >
> > I would vote for "gui" and "gui-expert"...or "expert-gui"
>
> Is the hyphen the problem? I've left that out currentl
On 5/14/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 14 May 2006 17:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > New knowlegde learnt me not to laugh at "experts" doing an
> > installation with the boot option 'expert'. I think it is time to
> > educate the "experts" and tell them and _
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:17AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 09 May 2006 21:28:27 +0200, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 02 May 2006 21:50:39 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Christian Perrier, le Tue 02 May 2006 19:59:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > brltty integration
> > > >
> > I'm not really completely fond of these names, mostly because I find
> > them hard to type on non US keyboards.
> >
> > I would vote for "gui" and "gui-expert"...or "expert-gui"
>
> Is the hyphen the problem? I've left that out currently.
At least the hyphen can be a problem. It's actually p
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > - As there will be separate initrds for CD images, we'll also need
> > separate boot options. We're thinking of "install-gui" and "expert-gui".
> > Other suggestions welcome.
>
>
> I'm not really completely fond of these
Hello,
I've been meaning to do this for probably a year, but I've finally gotten
around to actually looking into what is involved in using ipconfig in netcfg
as a replacement to dhcp-client, so we can get rid of DHCPv2 altogether.
The first observation I've made is that it doesn't appear to pass
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: business card
Image version: May 13 2006
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: May 14 2006
Machine: qemu
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions: 3 qemu images hda hdb and hdd. each
On Sunday 14 May 2006 17:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > New knowlegde learnt me not to laugh at "experts" doing an
> > installation with the boot option 'expert'. I think it is time to
> > educate the "experts" and tell them and _everyone_ that 'expert' is
> > 'detail'[1]
>
> Hmm,
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> - As there will be separate initrds for CD images, we'll also need
> separate boot options. We're thinking of "install-gui" and "expert-gui".
> Other suggestions welcome.
I'm not really completely fond of these names, mostly because I find
them hard t
On Sunday 14 May 2006 16:17, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Right now are the most recent images of debian-installer for amd64
> from the 8th of last month. I found those some what old files by
> following the home page of d-i
> on http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> to http://amd64.debian.
Hi all,
I'm seeing a problem trying to use the cdebconf-entropy plugin
after loading it in a daily build [0] (it does not happen when it
is included in the initrd [1]). In short: cdebconf dlopen()s the
plugin without problem (RTLD_LAZY), but dies with a relocation
error as soon as the plugin uses
Geert Stappers wrote:
> New knowlegde learnt me not to laugh at "experts" doing an installation
> with the boot option 'expert'. I think it is time to educate the
> "experts" and tell them and _everyone_ that 'expert' is 'detail'[1]
Hmm, I think that caling it "detail" is the best description I've
Package: srm-reader
Version: 0.09
Severity: serious
> Automatic build of srm-reader_0.09 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44
...
> dpkg-source: unpacking srm-reader_0.09.tar.gz
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is srm-reader
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.09
> dpkg-buildpackage: host archite
Please close this bug, since it's a feature, not a bug:
the text " -- BOOT_IMAGE=full/path/to/the/kernel-image"
is added to the kernel command line. The fact that it's
truncated at 256 characters, is probably due to the
used bootloader.
Sincerely,
Jan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
Right now are the most recent images of debian-installer for amd64
from the 8th of last month. I found those some what old files by
following the home page of d-i
on http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
to http://amd64.debian.net/debian-installer/daily/
It seems to me that the
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:19:23AM +, Wasfi JAOUAD wrote:
> Well, it's ok with the i386 version of the installer, but the AMD64 one still
> says :
>
>!! install the base system
>Cannot install the base system
> The installer connot figure o
Package: aboot-installer
Version: 0.0.20
Severity: serious
You're missing a build-dependency on debhelper:
> Automatic build of aboot-installer_0.0.20 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44
...
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is aboot-installer
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.0.20
> dpkg-buil
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:23:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Yesterday Joey and I discussed the integration of the graphical installer
> into the regular build system, and the result is below for wider
> discussion and comments.
>
> The below should be valid for both i386, but may need adjustmen
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:23:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Yesterday Joey and I discussed the integration of the graphical installer
> into the regular build system, and the result is below for wider
> discussion and comments.
> - As there will be separate initrds for CD images, we'll also ne
Well, it's ok with the i386 version of the installer, but the AMD64 one still
says :
!! install the base system
Cannot install the base system
The installer connot figure out how to install the base system. No installable
CD-ROM
was found and n
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:23:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> - Using the font tarballs is OK for the short run, but now that we
> are integrating g-i we really need to switch to using udebs.
> This should be finished before the Etch RC1 release.
I'll try to come up with more detail asap.
Basic
Hey Frans,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:04:24AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Today I've been able to upload cdebconf with updated dependencies and
> built the graphical installer *without any localudebs* :-)
> This means we've finally arrived at the point where we can integrate the
> graphical instal
63 matches
Mail list logo
