We are about to finalize and commit the partman-crypto new templates
(the current ones have many strings not marked for translation).
Frans, Geert Stappers, Max Wozeler and I have already reviewed all of
them, but none of us is a native English speaker, so a final look
would be worth it.
The file
We now have the needed udeb for ttf-dzongkha.
Changes:
ttf-dzongkha (0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add a udeb package for the graphical installer
Closes: #363251
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> > Its not a mkvmlinuz problem, the problem is in the kernel itself, and will
> > probably be fixed for 2.6.17. I am watching this, and will try to do a
> > backport if something promising comes on. Not sure i will have the time to
> > fix
> > it myself though.
Prep has been relegated to an emb
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:12:10AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Could you comment on this issue? IIRC you were the one that added the type
> udf for CDs.
>
> On Monday 17 April 2006 01:21, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > i was unable to see all of the files on a particular dvd (the world of
> > warcraft
On 06-May-02 20:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Adding the extra files under installer/build is no real issue. Any changes
> in tools or the Makefile needed?
Adding the extra ppc64 specific files should be sufficient.
> > I had to set up the network m
(Bcc:ed to Eki, since it's not clear whether he wants his email address
visible in public archives)
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:20:41AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Good news for the alpha porters out there, if you didn't see this on
> Planet Debian:
> - Forwarded message from Planet Debian <[EMA
Accepted:
partman-crypto_2.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_2.dsc
partman-crypto_2.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_2.tar.gz
partman-crypto_2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_2_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.
* Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-02 13:56]:
> There is still i386 hardware that does not work properly with any 2.6
> kernel. My laptop goes into "screen off" mode after some timeout on
> every 2.6 kernel tested (that would boot), and reboot is required to
> get the display back on.
D
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> i386: what to do?
> -
>
>No strong conclusion here. The discussion kinda got lost among various
>more general consideration.
>
>There seems to be an increasing consensus that supporting 2.4 on i386
>is mostly a waste of time, but actuall
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:59:54PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Work on fonts should now be finalized by Davide. If he needs some
> help, some other people could bring manpower.
yes, it's time to finalize fonts indeed!
So, the plan is to start making dejavu (11pt) the default font
for g-i.
M
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:59:54PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
[kernel issue]
> No news for m68k: Frans will mail the porters.
No need :-)
The situation is mostly the same: 2.4 works everywhere except on mac;
2.6 works on some machines, but certainly not all of them.
The upstream Linux/m68k
Christian Perrier, le Tue 02 May 2006 19:59:54 +0200, a écrit :
> brltty integration
> --
> Unofficial images have been built by Samuel Thibault but we don't have
> much news.
Brltty 3.7.2-3 should enter testing on Thursday. Then I will submit
a corrected patch for integration into
* Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-02 15:14]:
> Since my last mail there is around 2 months. This D220 seems not to be
> interesting in you ? Or am I wrong ?
Actually, Marc Zyngier was interested. I'll forward the mail to you
again.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
T
partman-crypto_2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_2.dsc
partman-crypto_2.tar.gz
partman-crypto_2_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:26:02AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:40:10AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > I commited both additionnal paragraph, including Geert's suggestion
> > change.
> > My only change has been using "the encryption security" instead of
> >
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:09:00AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06-May-01 19:23, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that once we are going multi-arch (probably not for etch though),
> > > the
> > > 64bit architectur
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > Please provide the full picture. We may re-evaluate after that.
> >
> > Notice that once we are g
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:01:00PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > The 'debian-installer' patch which I am currently using to build and
> > test d-i on ppc64 is 96 lines long. It basically reuses the config
> > files from the existing powerpc/power
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:49:07AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> > > to the architecture line in debian/contr
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:06:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 22:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I thought the consensus here was to add the ABI version to the updated
> > kernels for those arches lacking it, at least i was asking about this
> > for powerpc.
>
> Well, if an ABI h
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:52, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> The 'debian-installer' patch which I am currently using to build and
> test d-i on ppc64 is 96 lines long. It basically reuses the config
> files from the existing powerpc/powerpc64 case by directly including
> them.
Adding the extra files un
(reply-to: debian-boot)
Debian Installer team meeting number 11 has been held from 16:00UTC to
17:30UTC on Saturday April 29th 2006.
There were about 75 people connected to the channel during the meeting
and 12 of them spoke during the meeting at least once.
The full log of the meeting is availa
Interesting change which affects all installs at critical
priority.
exim4 will now no longer prompt for its config type at critical
priority, bu only high priority.
This means that critical priority installs will then have one less
question asked to users...\o/
Of course, this doesn't affect the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 365730 linux-2.6
Bug#365730: installation report (try 2)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 365730 [powerpc] [d-i] Oops when booting from usb flash drive
Bug#365730: installation report (try 2)
Changed
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 365730 linux-2.6
> retitle 365730 [powerpc] [d-i] Oops when booting from usb flash drive
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 02 May 2006 14:07, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Installer crashes with an oops, 'Un
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic-di_1.8_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic-di_1.8_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-amd64-generic-di_1.8_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-amd6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 365747 Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#365747: Fwd: [patch ] Add /dev/mapper in all cases needed in bsae-installer
Owner recorded as Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> tags 365747 + patch, pending
Bug#365747: Fwd: [patch ] Add /dev/mapper in
Accepted:
nslu2-firmware-installer_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nslu2-firmware-installer/nslu2-firmware-installer_0.1.dsc
nslu2-firmware-installer_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nslu2-firmware-installer/nslu2-firmware-installer_0.1.tar.gz
nslu2-firmware-installer_0.1_arm.udeb
to pool/main/n/nslu2-firmw
Accepted:
partman-crypto_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_1.dsc
partman-crypto_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_1.tar.gz
partman-crypto_1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_1_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.00_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.00_i386.udeb
choose-mirror_2.00.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.00.dsc
choose-mirror_2.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.00.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.00_all.udeb
t
Package: base-installer
Severity: wishlist
Now /dev/mapper structure is created only if lvm2 is detected. However,
device-mapper is also used by dm-crypt and EVMS. This patch creates
/target/dev/mapper in case device-mapper module is loaded. This
directory is needed (atleast) to get grub installed
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
«
« Updated files ('svn up')
«
« U en/bookinfo.xml
L40:
Translators can use ...
There is the same kind of in administrivia/administrivia.xml.
I use it for french translation.
Regards,
--
Philippe Batailler
--
To U
Good news for the alpha porters out there, if you didn't see this on
Planet Debian:
- Forwarded message from Planet Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Planet Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:15:32 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Martin-Éric Racine: Alpha debian-in
Hi,
Now /dev/mapper structure is created only if lvm2 is detected. However,
device-mapper is also used by dm-crypt and EVMS. This patch creates
/target/dev/mapper in case device-mapper module is loaded. This
directory is needed (atleast) to get grub installed.
The approach in the patch has the sl
Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If anyone is interested in the following machine for development,
> please get in contact with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> * Christophe Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-25 19:26]:
> > RotomaLUG(http://www.rotomalug.org/) is LUG of Rouen area (France).
>
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: usb flash drive (two different models attempted)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso
(from 4/1/06)
Date: 5/02/06 07:20
Machine: Xserve G5 cluster node (headle
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tags 365696 moreinfo please
> Thanks mate
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:45:16AM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> Package: installation-reports
>
>> :00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2653 (rev 03)
>> :00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:18:26AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #>
> #> > Tags 365696 moreinfo please
> #> Unknown tag/s: please.
> Tags 365696 moreinfo please
Unknown tag/s: please.
Recogni
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:40:10AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I commited both additionnal paragraph, including Geert's suggestion
> change.
>
> My only change has been using "the encryption security" instead of
> "the security of the encryption" and "the encryption strength" instead
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 365696 moreinfo please
Unknown tag/s: please.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream
Tags 365696 moreinfo please
Thanks mate
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:45:16AM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> :00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2653 (rev 03)
> :00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) SATA
> Controller (rev 03)
> May 2 09:58:52 ker
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:07:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365696: Failure to detect CD on IBM T43.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:17, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Please do not tag wishlist requests for the addition of 'ppc64'
> > to the architecture line in debian/control as 'wontfix'.
>
> How many other patches will be needed to get the l
43 matches
Mail list logo
