Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:38:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358608: installation: Please include seamonkey
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
> Partha Pratim Ghosh
> School of Mathematical Sciences
> Howard College Campus
> University of KwaZulu-Natal
> Durban 4041
Nothing much to do with your initial mail, but this just to let you
know that the Debian Installer team is stilll seeking for translators
for any of the 11 official language
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:58:29AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> (started on IRC, but as the list grew longer...)
> The following packages have been in unstable for a while and could be
> hinted into testing:
> unblock cdebconf/0.3.11 (25 days; not used by d-i)
> unblock openssh/1:4.2p1-7 (22 days)
>
Could this be udev or kernel-related? When I try to start udev in
chroot, I get
# /etc/init.d/udev start
* udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, not started.
failed!
# uname -a
Linux cortona 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic #1 Wed May 4 20:03:43 UTC 2005
x86_64 GNU/Linux
So the kernel is too old for udev,
I cloned a drive, starting with the MBR:
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdc bs=446 count=1
However, after installing the cloned drive in the new machine, all I get
is a scrolling GRUB filling the screen. I downloaded an amd64 netboot
CD, mounted / and /boot in /target, and issued
chroot /target
E
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.1_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.1_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.1_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.1
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.1_mips.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.1_mips.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.1_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.1.dsc
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.1.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.16-1-r4k-ip22-di_0.1_mips.udeb
ppp-modules-2.6.16-1-r4k-ip22-di_0.1_mips.udeb
loop-modules-2.6.16-1-r4k-
For a while now we have maintained a web page listing hardware that
developers are looking for to help with their Debian development
efforts: http://www.debian.org/misc/hardware_wanted
Through this page, we have successfully obtained a number of machines,
for example some Cobalt boxes used for the
TIP NÚMERO 21
TIP FINANCIERO PARA GANAR MÁS DINERO…
POR: OSWALDO REYES CORONA
TIP:
CRECIMIENTO EMPRESARIAL A TRAVES DE SOCIEDADES COOPERATIVAS
Las empresas cooperativas en nuestro país se remontan al siglo pasado, cuando hacia la segunda parte de la década de los
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.16-1-486-di_1.25_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.16-1-486-di_1.25_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-486-di_1.25_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-1-486-di_1.25_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-
(started on IRC, but as the list grew longer...)
The following packages have been in unstable for a while and could be
hinted into testing:
unblock cdebconf/0.3.11 (25 days; not used by d-i)
unblock openssh/1:4.2p1-7 (22 days)
unblock modutils/2.4.27.0-5 (17 days)
unblock util-linux/2.12r-8 (27 d
Your message dated Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:23:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358264: fixed in linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 1.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-alpha source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.65
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney
FYI: The status of the linux-kernel-di-hppa source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.55
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney
FYI: The status of the base-config source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.76
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint file
Hello Martin,
I'm using, here in O.S. Systems, the digress and we do support for
more then one arch like the official dilab does. Here we solved the
problem using the arch in prefix. I'm posting a dhcp configuration for
reference:
group {
next-server lab.ossystems.com.br;
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: X floppy? network?>
Image version:
Date: 3-23-06 11 AM
Machine: default
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked:[o]
Configure n
Dafydd Harries mentioned this to me on IRC.
The most common way to write "key ID" seems to be by using capitals
for "ID" rather than "key id"
Shouldn't we change this? If so, this needs preventive unfuzzy of
translations so I prefer doing it myself...
--
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:24:52AM -0800, Reuben Kishoyian wrote:
> Hi Tapio,
> If you mean apt-get install x-window-system then that is exactly what i am
> doing to install it. Thanks for the response.
>
Then something is wrong with your apt-setup or the install server you
get the packages fr
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
< madduck> right now, pxelinux.0 and pxelinux.cfg are symlinks into
debian-installer/${arch}/
< madduck> this won't work if i need to support 2+ arches
< madduck> thus, instead i propose to remove the symlinks
< madduck> remove the debian-in
Hi Tapio, If you mean apt-get install x-window-system then that is exactly what i am doing to install it. Thanks for the response.Tapio Lehtonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:50:50PM -0800, Reuben Kishoyian wrote:> Hi Forum,> Iam trying to install x-window-system in a debi
On Thursday 23 March 2006 16:26, Pierre DURAND wrote:
> My problem is when i'm starting to install the system, after that the
> installer detect the cdrom and the hardware and load all the modules,
> the installer says that my cdrom isn't a Debian CD .
Take a look at the .disk directory on officia
Hello
I'am trying to build a debian cdrom with a more young linux 2.6 kernel and
my own packages .
My problem is when i'm starting to install the system, after that the
installer detect the cdrom and the hardware and load all the modules, the
installer says that my cdrom isn't a Debian CD .
Please
On Thursday 23 March 2006 16:04, Partha Pratim Ghosh wrote:
> I wish to install Debian Sarge and I have the 14-CD set. The
> installation programme recognises my DVD-drive, but does not recognise
> the SATA drives. In the phase where it checks for partition table, it
> provides me with the pa
Dear Debian Developers,
I have a Intel P4 PCI Express board with two 160 GB SATA hard drives
and one Seagate ide harddrive. I have a floppy drive and a DVD-RW drive.
I have WinXP installed on one of the SATA drives and the Seagate hdd has
some data from my old windows 98 machine.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358532 important
Bug#358532: installation-reports: sparc ultra 1 reboot fails
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 358532 hw-detect
Bug#358532: installation-reports: sparc ultra 1 reboot fails
Bug reassigned from package `installation-repor
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -No sound (int he past it (just worked")
The installer does not set up sound support for the installed system.
Installing the alsa-base package should probably do the trick. You may
have to adjust the sound volume after installation as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358608 tasksel
Bug#358608: installation: Please include seamonkey
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `tasksel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On 3/23/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 13:18, Matheus Morais wrote:> Sorry about this. I have download the source package of d-i and I> follow the README document in installer/build directory. I used make> all_build option to build the d-i system so, I copy build
Package: installation
Severity: wishlist
Mozilla is not dead. Most mozilla users switch to seamonkey. Seamonkey is much
more reliable than
mozilla 1.7.*. Seamonkey permits to get the advantage of the aviary without
its inconvenients
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:54:13PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Output of lspci and lspci -n:
That output is needed to detect the sound card.
> Base System Installation Checklist:
> [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
>
> Configure network HW: [ O]
> Config
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:58:56AM +0100, Patrick Nomblot wrote:
> Thank you for replying Rick,
>
> in fact, install works fine directly to compact flash with installer (it
> is installed as an IDE disk). My need was simply to tell installer to
> prepare also a second disk. This could also happe
On Thursday 23 March 2006 13:18, Matheus Morais wrote:
> Sorry about this. I have download the source package of d-i and I
> follow the README document in installer/build directory. I used make
> all_build option to build the d-i system so, I copy build/dest to my
> local repository and generate th
severity 358532 important
reassign 358532 hw-detect
thanks
On Thursday 23 March 2006 03:35, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Please don't inflate severity: a reboot failure on one specific type of
system does not make the whole installer unusable.
On 3/22/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 20:48, Rick Thomas wrote:> On Mar 22, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Frans Pop wrote:> > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:16, Matheus Morais wrote:> >> The d-i firsts steps of installation proccess are working well but
> >> in choose-mirr
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 07:59:13PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Heh, would help if I actually attached the debdiff. I guess that's what
> happens when you fire off email with one eye open in the wee hours of
> the morning.
hehe, thanks for the patch, unfortunately I'm not going to have some fre
Thank you for replying Rick,
in fact, install works fine directly to compact flash with installer (it
is installed as an IDE disk). My need was simply to tell installer to
prepare also a second disk. This could also happen to get better
performances and use a separate disk for swap or /home.
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:50:50PM -0800, Reuben Kishoyian wrote:
> Hi Forum,
> Iam trying to install x-window-system in a debian sarge and i get the
> message the folllowing packages have unmet dependencies:
> x-window-system depends: x-window-system-core, xdm, xprt-xprintorg and xterm
> Do
39 matches
Mail list logo
