Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:27:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345999: installation-report: Fails to detect CD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
I want to mention here that I recently got proofs that Primoz
Peterlin, the upstream author of ttf-freefont, follows the PTS for the
ttf-freefont package.
He just fixed an issue I reported him from the Debian PTS, with a
patch...and I have some hopes that he'll be able to look at the line
spacing
Hi everyone.
I have the same thing here.
I've downloaded a testing cd image today (02-20-2006) and faced two
problems:
1 - The modules for the 2.6 kernel were not found by Debian installer,
which seems to use kernel 2.6.12-1. However, the modules on CD are
version 2.6.15-1. So I had to switch
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 01:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 01:23, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Felipe, could you send us the output of 'lsmod' for both the old
> > installer (that worked) and the new one?
>
> That might be a problem, because the laptop is not currently here (i
Accepted:
debian-installer_20060218.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20060218.dsc
debian-installer_20060218.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20060218.tar.gz
debian-installer_20060218_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20060218
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:17:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331796: fixed in debhelper 5.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Monday 20 February 2006 22:56, you wrote:
> Any reason why you don't read the Release file? It already includes
> that information.
Because on a partial local mirror (like the one I have at home, created
with debmirror), the /Release file will still list all
architectures and not only those a
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> The attached patch will check if the architecture is supported by reading
> the index.html file for the binary-$arch directory and checking if there
> is a reference to a Packages.gz file in that. If the arch is not
> supported, the wg
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Ew. So we don't support mirrors which don't provide indices? Why not
> just do a HEAD request instead? (Yes, wget doesn't support it yet,
> but that would be a much nicer way to do it and should be easy enough
> to fix.)
Why not just download dists/$suite/main/binary-$a
On Monday 20 February 2006 19:00, Geert Stappers wrote:
> $ lynx -head -dump
> http://mir:/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
> HTTP/1.0 501 Not Implemented
> Connection: close
That looks like maybe a wishlist bug report against apt-proxy.
pgpG76hQwVShr.pgp
Description: PGP si
On Monday 20 February 2006 17:32, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Ew. So we don't support mirrors which don't provide indices? Why not
> just do a HEAD request instead? (Yes, wget doesn't support it yet,
> but that would be a much nicer way to do it and should be easy enough
> to fix.)
/me not being s
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:32:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> Ew. So we don't support mirrors which don't provide indices? Why not
> just do a HEAD request instead? (Yes, wget doesn't support it yet,
> but that would be a much nicer way to do it and should be easy enough
> to fix.)
$ ly
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> tags 353556 + patch
> thanks
>
> The attached patch will check if the architecture is supported by reading
> the index.html file for the binary-$arch directory and checking if there
> is a reference to a Packages.gz file in that. If th
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Ew. So we don't support mirrors which don't provide indices?
Second that EW. And I know that there are toplevel country mirrors that
do not provide indices.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Frans Pop
| The attached patch will check if the architecture is supported by reading
| the index.html file for the binary-$arch directory and checking if there
| is a reference to a Packages.gz file in that. If the arch is not
| supported, the wget will return 404 and the check will fail.
TetraBrazil offers International Coaches the unique opportunity to travel to Brazil and get the Brazilian National Soccer Association Professional Coaches’ License ("A" License). Brazilian National Soccer Coaches Association - AB
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:23:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353640: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:08:31PM -0300, Leonardo Boiko wrote:
> I'll send an installation-report, but I'm afraid I forgot to keep the syslog.
In the installed system is /var/log/installer the place to look for the
logfiles.
HtH
GSt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 353556 + patch
Bug#353556: choose-mirror: should check that architecture is supported by mirror
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
tags 353556 + patch
thanks
The attached patch will check if the architecture is supported by reading
the index.html file for the binary-$arch directory and checking if there
is a reference to a Packages.gz file in that. If the arch is not
supported, the wget will return 404 and the check will f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> # does not affect most users, specific to lowmem?
> severity 339326 important
Bug#339326: Installation problems Linux Debian
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:25:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353574:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353687 + pending
Bug#353687: debian-installer-utils: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bogl-bterm'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Package: debian-installer-utils
Version: 1.23
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'debian-installer-utils' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_compress -i
dh_fixperms -i
for file in /usr/share/terminfo/a/ansi /usr/share/terminfo/l/linux \
/usr/share/termi
24 matches
Mail list logo
