On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:17:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bug #253693 has some info on degraded mode.
>
> Applied the patch BTW, and my you squeaked in under the wire of the
> string freeze..
Thanks for applying it. There are some translations that need to be
updated, especially with regard to
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 08:22:13PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Yesterday I made some changes in partman and partman-partitioning to
> allow resizing of NTFS partitions.
>
This is nothing short of bloody brilliant. Good stuff. This will make it
approach something close to as easy as falling off
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:28:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-efi 3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:11:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I think I've just discovered a major difference between the "hfs"
> implementation in 2.4 and that in 2.6.
>
> When one mounts an hfs filesystem under 2.4, there are a bunch of
> pseudo-directories with names beginning with a "." tha
On Thursday, September 30, 2004, at 12:11 AM, Duane Cottle wrote:
Hi Rick,
Sure does. I spent five hours reading your posts since March today.
I take that as the highest of compliments. (<-8) Thank you, sir!
It's
already saved me a lot of trouble testing this stuff. Been working with
boot floppies
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> One question is who will care to install ntfstools-udeb. I see three
> choices:
>
> 1. ntfstools-udeb receives standard priority
> 2. partman-partitioning depends on ntfstools-udeb
> 3. left things as they are now - the user will have to request the
>installation of nt
At 30 Sep 04 03:47:02 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> - make this an arch any package, and vary the dependencies to pull in
>ntfstools-udeb on architectures that are likely to have ntfs partitions
I found ntfstools-udeb hadn't been entered in testing yet.
Does it need hint by RM's hand and ne
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:49:17PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, at 02:56 AM, Duane Cottle wrote:
>
> >Partition notes:
> > As I was playing around in the partitioner, I decided to delete the
> >32.2K partion #1 on the scsi drive called Apple. After the partitio
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_29.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_29.dsc
partman-partitioning_29.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_29.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_2
partman-partitioning_29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_29.dsc
partman-partitioning_29.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_29_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Accepted:
partman-efi_3.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_3.dsc
partman-efi_3.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_3.tar.gz
partman-efi_3_ia64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_3_ia64.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 268555
T
Accepted:
partman_58.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_58.dsc
partman_58.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_58.tar.gz
partman_58_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_58_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, at 02:56 AM, Duane Cottle wrote:
Partition notes:
As I was playing around in the partitioner, I decided to delete the
32.2K partion #1 on the scsi drive called Apple. After the partitions
were displayed once again on the screen, I noticed a 32.2K hole on the
IDE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 268555 + fixed
Bug#268555: two partition types for efi on ia64
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
partman_58_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_58.dsc
partman_58.tar.gz
partman_58_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
tag 268555 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:19:33 -0400
Source: partman-efi
Binary: partman-efi
Architecture: source ia64
partman-efi_3_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_3.dsc
partman-efi_3.tar.gz
partman-efi_3_ia64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, at 01:30 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
However... There is one important thing missing from the boot
disks. Specifically, the "System" file is zero length. This is
true of both boot and ofonlyboot for both 2.4 and 2.6. It won't
boot that way.
Arg, again. I have t
I installed windows 2003 server[1] and it made a 40 gb ntfs partition. If I
select the partiton and resize, it says the minimum size is 512 bytes. I
told it to resize it down to 1 gb, and it went back to the main menu
with no error message (or size change). I guess the minimum size is not
properly
Joey Hess wrote:
> Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > I have an error with the daily buils of netboot for the last few days
> > stating that the kernel (2.6 on i386) modules are not available. Of
> > course, it cannot detect the disks and the installation cannot go further.
>
> Please give us the actual er
All the efi labels are now reasonable, although I do notice that in the
list of partition types, it has "Use the partition as a EFI boot
partition". It would be more consistent with the rest of the list to
just have "EFI boot partition", I think. Since that string is the
description of another temp
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> I have an error with the daily buils of netboot for the last few days
> stating that the kernel (2.6 on i386) modules are not available. Of
> course, it cannot detect the disks and the installation cannot go further.
Please give us the actual error message, tell us what med
I just tried the netinst CD image from:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
When I got to the stage of installing GRUB, I chose to
install on fd0. It failed, and all I could do was go
back and install it somewhere else.
I tried:
(fd0)
fd0
"fd0"
"(fd0)"
/dev/fd0
"/dev/fd0"
None worked.
Äú·¢À´µÄ×ÊÁÏÒѾÊÕµ½£¬ÕýÔÚÖÆ×÷ÖÐ
ÖйúÃÀÊõ¸ß¿¼Íø
www.msgao.com
ÃÀÊõÉú×îÐÅÀµµÄ¸ß¿¼ÍøÕ¾
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sarge release seems to be delayed indefinately by some issue with the
testing-secuirty autobuilders
noone seems to be reavealing just what is wrong with them though?!
a little offtopic i know but does anyone know what is holding them up?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenshi Muto [mailto:[
WHO IN THE WORLD SENT ME THIS?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:14:51 +0100
the attachment for more information.
<< message.zip >>
_
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN S
At 29 Sep 04 19:51:20 GMT,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Yesterday I made some changes in partman and partman-partitioning to
> > allow resizing of NTFS partitions.
> >
> > There is no progress bar and in the file
> > partman-partitioning/active_partition/resize/choices we have to
>
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 16:10, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jim Lieb wrote:
> > I just did an svn --show-updates -verbose status from
> > packages/partman/partman-efi in my working copy and got the following:
> >
> > * an "svn: subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c:899: tweak_statushash:Assertion
> > repos_
/proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 740/750
temperature : 32-35 C (uncalibrated)
clock : 233MHz
revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202)
bogomips: 465.92
machine : Power Macintosh
motherboard : AAPL,Gossamer MacRISC
detected as : 48 (
Colin Watson wrote:
> That's possible ... suggestions for naming of the common class? I'd been
> thinking the new classes were small enough not to matter too much.
>
> Maybe some magic could go into Debconf::Element::Noninteractive.
Yes, it seems to me most noninteractive elemenets could just der
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 274144 kernel
Bug#274144: install freezes during network setup
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:25:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > This patch implements a DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN environment variable
> > that debootstrap can set to make the noninteractive frontend behave a
> > little differently, without risking breaking other uses of the
I have an error with the daily buils of netboot for the last few days
stating that the kernel (2.6 on i386) modules are not available. Of
course, it cannot detect the disks and the installation cannot go further.
Anybody knows why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040927
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/
uname -a: n/a install failed
Date: 20040927
Method: netinst
Machine: asus a7n8x
Processor:ahtlon 1500
Memory:1 gig
Root Device: ide 20gb drive
Root Size/partition tab
Jim Lieb wrote:
> I just did an svn --show-updates -verbose status from
> packages/partman/partman-efi in my working copy and got the following:
>
> * an "svn: subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c:899: tweak_statushash:Assertion
> repos_text_status == svn_wc_status_added failed" error. This was
> at
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040927
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
asus a7n8x motherboard with built in nforce2 NIC, and 2nd intel pro 100 S
pci nic.
I tried installing using expert26. Both cards fail to work. The install
freezes when either attempting to use DHCP for either card, or it fr
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 23:51]:
> Hi there! I'm a graphic designer (creative ;) from Madrid, Spain & I would
> like to help with some desings & images to the anaconda installer.
>
> If you are interested, please contact me at this mail :D.
Thanks for your offer. I'm c
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 12:55, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jim Lieb wrote:
> > > I noticed that with this patch, there is still no type given for efi
> > > partitions in the main partman menu. With the last version of the
> > > patch, a type was given, though the menu item was doubled.
> >
> > I'm no
Colin Watson wrote:
> This patch implements a DEBCONF_NONINTERACTIVE_SEEN environment variable
> that debootstrap can set to make the noninteractive frontend behave a
> little differently, without risking breaking other uses of the
> noninteractive frontend. What do you think?
This looks reasonabl
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily build floppy-2.4 power from
people.d.o/~luther, as of 29. Sep
Method: floppy-2.4, net-driver.floppy, installed unstable
Machine: Power Mac 4400/200
Processor: 603ev
Memory:48mb
Root Device: ide, hda2
:00:0b.0 Host
Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> After a discussion with joeyh and joshk last night on #debian-boot, I
> submit to you the attached patch for inclusion in d-i. It adds RAID5
> support, plus fixes a couple of trivial but important bugs in the RAID1
> code's check for the required number of partitions to bui
|| On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:22:13 +0300
|| Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
az> Yesterday I made some changes in partman and partman-partitioning to
az> allow resizing of NTFS partitions.
Really Good :-)
az> One question is who will care to install ntfstools-udeb. I see three
az> choice
Hello,
> Andres Salomon wrote:
>> Hrm. What ends up happening? Where does it fail?
>
> On my test laptop, it just doesn't try to boot from usb at all
> apparently and goes on to boot the grub on the system's hard disk.
It depends on the BIOS. My Toshiba laptop does not boot from USB
at all. But
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > I've found some more instances of this problem. I managed to catch a
> > diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't
> > remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database:
>
> No
asus a7n8x motherboard with onboard nforce nic and 2nd intel pro 100 S nic.
tried the latest sarge netinst from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(on the 27th)
tried the 2.4 and 2.6 kernel (linux and linux26) and it hangs with the cd
drive.
Alex Fernandez wrote:
> There you go. (debian-installer log is huge, sorry.)
> > >
> > > During the install, I got a kernel from the 2.4
> > > series, and also kernel 2.6.7. The first worked
> > ok,
> > > the second loaded no modules. After installing I
> > had
> > > to manually select package ker
Paul Telford wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Paul Telford wrote:
> > > d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/discs/disc0/disc
> > > d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select All files in one partition
> > > (recommendedfor new users)
> > > d-i partman/cho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 273935 installation-reports
Bug#273935: debian-installer installs kernel 2.6 without modules
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
>
End o
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> Paul Telford wrote:
> > d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/discs/disc0/disc
> > d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select All files in one partition
> > (recommendedfor new users)
> > d-i partman/choose_partitionselect Finish
Accepted:
arcboot-installer_0.012.dsc
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.012.dsc
arcboot-installer_0.012.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.012.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_0.012_mips.udeb
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.012_mips.ud
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 261491 + fixed
Bug#261491: doesn't show right devices under 2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Paul Telford wrote:
> d-i partman-auto/disk string /dev/discs/disc0/disc
> d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select All files in one partition
> (recommendedfor new users)
> d-i partman/choose_partitionselect Finish partitioning and write
> changes to disk
> d-
Jim Lieb wrote:
> > I noticed that with this patch, there is still no type given for efi
> > partitions in the main partman menu. With the last version of the patch,
> > a type was given, though the menu item was doubled.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean.
When partman displays the efi partition in
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Yesterday I made some changes in partman and partman-partitioning to
> allow resizing of NTFS partitions.
>
> There is no progress bar and in the file
> partman-partitioning/active_partition/resize/choices we have to
> replace "/usr/sbin/ntfsresize" by "/usr/bin/ntfsresize"
tag 261491 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:25:23 +0100
Source: arcboot-installer
Binary: arcboot-installer
Architecture:
arcboot-installer_0.012_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
arcboot-installer_0.012.dsc
arcboot-installer_0.012.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_0.012_mips.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hrm. What ends up happening? Where does it fail?
On my test laptop, it just doesn't try to boot from usb at all
apparently and goes on to boot the grub on the system's hard disk.
> > If grub did support vfat, this would be easier yet since the boot.img.gz
> > is a vfat f
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-18 17:44]:
> +bootdevline=`grep "^\ \+8\ \+$bootmin\ \+" /proc/partitions | sed 's/.* //'`
Thiemo pointed out in private communication that sed 's/.* //' will
not work under 2.4. The following will work under both 2.4 and 2.6:
sed -e "s/ \+/ /g" | cut -d " " -
Hi all,
I've been trying to complete a hands-free install using a debconf preseed
and run into a problem with disk partitioning. I've tried using the
preseed templates from
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/svn/debian-installer/installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/example-preseed.xml
and
http://d
[Please CC me on replies - I'm not currently subscribed to -boot. That
might change if I start to do d-i hacking more frequently.]
Hi d-i team,
After a discussion with joeyh and joshk last night on #debian-boot, I
submit to you the attached patch for inclusion in d-i. It adds RAID5
support, plus
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 14:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Syslinux does not work for me (as well as a few other people), for
> > memory stick booting (see #273453 for more details).
>
> Unfortunatly, booting grub from a USB device has always failed for me
> and your method di
Hi,
> > However... There is one important thing missing from the boot
> > disks. Specifically, the "System" file is zero length. This is
> > true of both boot and ofonlyboot for both 2.4 and 2.6. It won't
> > boot that way.
> Arg, again. I have to checkup and see what is missing in the build pr
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 23:21, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jim Lieb wrote:
> > As promised. Here is the revised patch. This has been tested
> > and I had my glasses on at the time so I could see that the 'efi'
> > was indeed gone. As with the previous patch this has changes
> > to the templates but
Accepted:
fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-m68k/fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.64_m68
Hi,
thanks for your bug report!
> Output of lspci and lspci -n:
> :00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40)
> :00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01)
> :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II
> 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a
Yesterday I made some changes in partman and partman-partitioning to
allow resizing of NTFS partitions.
There is no progress bar and in the file
partman-partitioning/active_partition/resize/choices we have to
replace "/usr/sbin/ntfsresize" by "/usr/bin/ntfsresize". Today there
were rainstorms and
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.64_source+m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.64.dsc
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.64.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.64_m68k.udeb
ppp-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.64_m6
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:44, Frans Pop wrote:
> I've created a new patch that removes the use of translated values.
Damn. Just noticed the en.po was incorrect (left over stuff from earlier
attempts).
So here's the correct patch.
Index: kbd-chooser.c
=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 273384 + patch
Bug#273384: kbd-chooser: Is not run again after backing out
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
I've created a new patch that removes the use of translated values.
I've tested it on my laptop (i386) in both default and expert installations.
Note: I've only tested kbd-chooserin a mini-iso, not a full install.
The basic idea is to use the template names instead of the template
descriptions f
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 03:51:12PM -0400, Brian Pack wrote:
> Package: discover1
> Version: 1.6.6
> Followup-For: Bug #270290
>
> I've had the same issues with disappearing mount points, but only with
> the 2.6.8 kernel. If I replace the mount points when running 2.6.8 and
> then reboot to 2.6.8,
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: RC1
uname -a: Linux backup 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Sat Aug 28 14:11:39 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 24/09/2004 1500 NZST
Method: Business card CD in IDE (PATA) CDRom drive, national mirror. Plus
some... see below
Machine: IBM eServer xSeries 206
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 273551 -1
Bug#273551: discover-data: Radeon 9600 not detected properly
Bug 273551 cloned as bug 274039.
> reassign -1 discover1-data
Bug#274039: discover-data: Radeon 9600 not detected properly
Bug reassigned from package `discover-data' to `disc
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:25:22AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Saturday, September 25, 2004, at 04:49 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> >After my changes,
> >there's *loads* of room left for things. We were just being
> >inefficient,
> >that's all.
>
> Well,
>
> I just took a look at the latest
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Date: 24.09.2004
Method: cd-installation of above image ftp-server: ftp.de.debian (no proxy)
Machine: network (desktop)
Processor: intel P2
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: IDE
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please ela
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:22:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273906: Acknowledgement (kernel type mismatch)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 273975 debian-installer-manual
Bug#273975: debian-installer: Provide prebuilt nbi for etherboot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debian-installer-manual'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
reassign 273975 debian-installer-manual
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:16:08AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.27.1731 +0200]:
> > Sorry for the late reply. It seems to mee that discover1 is the culprit
> > and it probably deleted the directories created in prebaseconfig.
> > Please
Hi,
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu em Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:18:55 -0400:
> Gleydson Mazioli da Silva wrote:
> > I've worked with cvs for a long time, and all my changes have been commited using
> > "svn ci file" and
> > "svn ci directory" (where are a lot o files translated inside director
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:39:48AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Please consider applying this patch for all the /media/cdrom bugs. More
> keep coming in every day, I've added this to my release blockers for rc1
> list and would prefer to see it fixed by tc1.
>
> As bast I can tell, the bug occurs whe
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:15:00PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> ps : it would be a pleasure to help you, but can you give me all
> commands you want to see me doing, so i can do a one shot work on the
> machine -- as i tell you i have only sporadic access to it, the machine
> will be out for 2 w
Since the time is not on our side I'll better forward this mail
so others can jump in as well.
Regards,
Joey
- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:57:25 +0200
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAI
also sprach Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.27.1731 +0200]:
> Sorry for the late reply. It seems to mee that discover1 is the culprit
> and it probably deleted the directories created in prebaseconfig.
> Please send the output of "discover --device cdrom" on this machine. It
> should
Package: debian-installer-manual
This bugreport is a todo-item, it is filed to prevent getting lost.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:46:29PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, at 07:19 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Remember that MacOS 7.5 doesn't work on all mod
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040928 Sarge Debian Installer rc1
From: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/20040928/
uname -a: Linux ppc 2.6.7-powerpc #1 Sat Jul 10 03:47:45 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-09-29 1:38am E
87 matches
Mail list logo
