Package: base-config
Version: 2.45
Severity: wishlist
The user that is created during installation has absolutely nothing in
his home directory. I would expect to find there the files from
/etc/skel...
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
Hi Joey,
I tried lspci, but it doesn't appear to be in the path of the shell I
get to via alt-f2 when booting through the install off of the dvd image.
Searching the contents of the dvd doesn't turn it up either. (I'm
presuming it's a command accessible from the shell. Let me know if
that's not
8556096051076323037
Content-Type:html;
charset="ISO-8859-1"
B;uy meds for 8O% 1ess than in st0re
Or;der H;ere
http://www.pajabadjfh.info/20/
Wanders and watches, with eager ears,
At once the Source, and End, and Test of Art
8556096051076323037--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:34:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271663: pkgdetails missing libgcc_s.so.1 on mipsel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:17:13PM +0200, Luc Castermans wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> INSTALL REPORT
> info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;_NEC DVD_RW ND-2510A;/dev/hda
> info: /bin/report-hw: discover: 8139too;;;Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.;RTL-8139;
> Building Depende
Medical Record ID# 8736-05218
Database Client ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We know you need it, don't be embarrassed about your
below average p.e.n.i.s.
http://www.herbaldealz.com/pgf/track.php?id=98
This information has been encrypted and will be for
your eyes only.
Sincerly
Monique Manuel
Medica
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:27:29PM +0200, J? Fahlke wrote:
> retitle 272552 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
> retitle 272562 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
> thanks
>
> [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in bcc ]
Okay
> Am Di, 21. Sep 2004, 13:13:50 +0200 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> > Where we, this project, had
Hi ppl,
I do miss one thing in the new debian installer (and in the old ones
also). I would like to be able to use LVM for all filesystems in a
debian install. Like
/dev/vg00/lvboot on /boot type ext2 (r)
/dev/vg00/lvroot on / type xfs (rw)
/dev/vg00/lvtmp on /tmp type xfs (rw)
/dev/vg00/lvvar o
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:13:43PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When I tried to update my local copy of d-i, I got an
> error message saying
>
> % svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk d-i
> :
> svn: Berkeley DB error while checkpointing after Berkeley DB transaction for
> filesys
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 10:13:18AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I need a custom installer to install Debian on my powerpc host;
> unfortunately, my only other host is i386. How does one build an
> installer for a foreign architecture?
One doesn't, the debian installer build process depends
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Geert Stappers]
> > > The manual writes about bootparameter debconf/frontend=
> > > but that didn't make sense with cdebconf_udeb 0.70
> > >
> > > Adding DEBIAN_FRONTEND= did do what I wanted.
> >
> >
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-2.6.8
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.66_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.66.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.66.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_0.66_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.8-1-386-di_
I need a custom installer to install Debian on my powerpc host;
unfortunately, my only other host is i386. How does one build an
installer for a foreign architecture?
I got debian-installer 20040801, using "apt-get source
debian-installer".
I've cross compiled a kernel, made modules.dep using
James Todd wrote:
> Version: 2-Sep-2004 sarge snapshot (dvd)
>
> During both a default installation and a linux26 installation, the
> problem occurs at the partitioning stage. Manual partitioning is the
> only option because no drives or partitions are detected. The drives are
> known to be fun
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 272532 installation-reports
Bug#272532: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Install feedback]
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 272514 installation-reports
Bug#272514: install: Partition table written to disk without user agreement
Bug reassigned from package `partman-md' to `installation-reports'.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 272443 installation-reports
Bug#272443: Sarge installer report - SATA drives not detected on Sis180 chip, Asus
p4s800d-e board
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer'
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Geert Stappers]
> > The manual writes about bootparameter debconf/frontend=
> > but that didn't make sense with cdebconf_udeb 0.70
> >
> > Adding DEBIAN_FRONTEND= did do what I wanted.
>
> I prefer DEBIAN_FRONTEND because it is the same as the parameter used
> on
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> What's the status of this? Does /boot on LVM work?
>
> I was thinking, if /boot (be that as a filesystem in it's own right, or as
> part of the root filesystem) is detected to be on a logical volume, the
> installer should fall back to using LILO as the bootloader, that wa
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
Origin: Debian
Label: Debian
Suite: testing
Codename: sarge
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:36:21 UTC
Architectures: i386
Components: main contrib
Description: Debian Testing distribution - Not Released
uname -a: Linux pc_antoinette 2.4.26-1-386
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: ? sarge-i386-1.iso (2004/09/21, jigdo-lite)
uname -a: n/a
Date: 2004/09/21
Method: sarge-i386-1.iso, linux26, using floppy for first reboot
Machine: i386
Processor: AMD XP1700+
Memory: 512 MB DDR
Root Device: /dev/sdb3
Root Size/partition
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.60_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.60_mips.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.60_mips.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips/fat-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.60_mips.ud
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt-di_0.60_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt-di_0.60_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di_0.60_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swa
[Geert Stappers]
> The manual writes about bootparameter debconf/frontend=
> but that didn't make sense with cdebconf_udeb 0.70
>
> Adding DEBIAN_FRONTEND= did do what I wanted.
I prefer DEBIAN_FRONTEND because it is the same as the parameter used
on the shell command line, and the traditional
Hello Dist,
The manual writes about bootparameter debconf/frontend=
but that didn't make sense with cdebconf_udeb 0.70
Adding DEBIAN_FRONTEND= did do what I wanted.
Was there a transistion from one to the other bootparameter?
(and had I the bad luck to encounter it? ;-)
What should be done
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:21:47AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:05:11PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Where should frontends be included?
> >
> > I mean debconf frontends as 'newt' (the default), 'ncurses' and 'bogl'
> >
> > In the build directory there is place for
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Daily netinst from 20040913
Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1
(20040913) -- downloaded as sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040920/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux radada 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Sat Aug 28 13:18:58 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 09/21/2004 15:30
Method: Sid, boot from sarge cd, paquets from l
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:20:42PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> >>The 2.6 kernel netboot image I build for sparc32
> >>is larger then 270,000,000 bytes.
>
> It's fixed but not uploaded pending a possible fix for udiv versioning
> that mistakenly taints the kernel. The probl
I am experiencing the same bug -- a kernel panic, just after the cramfs
and reiserfs_read_super errors. I checked the MD5 sums, burned a second
CD, and tried the businesscard image, but the message was the same.
In particular, it seems that this is a different problem from the
sparc mkisofs proble
tags 272639 patch
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: countrychooser
> Severity: normal
> Tags: l10n d-i
>
> As a side effect of the use of a master file for French translations, the
> countrychooser templates currently use ISO-8859-1 encoding.
>
> As they are merged
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 272639 patch
Bug#272639: countrychooser: Wrong encoding in French translation for the long country
list
Tags were: d-i l10n
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Hi folks,
When I tried to update my local copy of d-i, I got an
error message saying
% svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk d-i
:
svn: Berkeley DB error while checkpointing after Berkeley DB transaction for
filesystem /svn/d-i/db:
No space left on device
After that all further checkouts returned
retitle 272552 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
retitle 272562 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
thanks
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in bcc ]
Am Di, 21. Sep 2004, 13:13:50 +0200 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> Where we, this project, had succesfull installs on sparc64,
> I ask you to retitle the bugs to something l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 272552 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
Bug#272552: Install report for sparc64 with kernel 2.6 via netboot (failed)
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 272562 no menu on sbus Ultra sparc 1
Bug#272562: Install report for sparc64 with kernel 2.4 via netboo
> On Monday 20 September 2004 22:07, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Index: doc/manual/en/boot-installer/sparc.xml
> > ===
> > --- doc/manual/en/boot-installer/sparc.xml (revision 21886)
> > +++ doc/manual/en/boot-installer/sparc.xml (work
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:45:55PM +0200, J? Fahlke wrote:
> Am Di, 21. Sep 2004, 12:35:22 +0200 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> > What is different between bugreport #272552 and #272562?
> > I did merge them, but possible shouldn't have done so.
>
> One is for an image with kernel 2.6, the other for 2.
Am Di, 21. Sep 2004, 12:35:22 +0200 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> What is different between bugreport #272552 and #272562?
> I did merge them, but possible shouldn't have done so.
One is for an image with kernel 2.6, the other for 2.4. Also, the
symtoms differ a bit, the installer does not restart co
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:14:12AM -0700, Devin Carraway wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
probably a reassign to cdebconf-newt-udeb
or reassign to debian-installer to include cdebconf-text-udeb
> Debian-installer-version: 20040802 netboot
> Date: 2004-09-19
> Severity: normal
> Method: rarp
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 11:24:25AM +0200, J? Fahlke wrote:
> I repeated the installation attempt with the new daily build. The
> result was the same.
What is different between bugreport #272552 and #272562?
I did merge them, but possible shouldn't have done so.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgp7WQh5NF
Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:54:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-09-07 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > > I know there were some changes for Dutch including some fairly
> > > important ones for exim4.
> > For exim4 updates, it all depends on the maintai
On Monday 20 September 2004 22:07, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:40:42PM +0200, J? Fahlke wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> >
> > First, the installation manual talks about "boot net:dhcp", but my
> > machine tries to boot via ARP if I use that. Please mention "boot
> > net:boot
I repeated the installation attempt with the new daily build. The
result was the same.
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-09-20/sparc64/netboot/boot.img
uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.4.27-1-sparc64 #1 Mon Aug 23 23:59:55 PDT 2004 sparc64 unknown
Date: Tue Sep
reassign 266872 kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
severity 266872 minor
retitle 266872 ohci1394 doesn't load this `Ricoh Co Ltd R5C552 IEEE 1394 Controller'
thanks
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> maks attems wrote:
> > finally got this piece of log, it's attached.
> > --
> > insmod: init_module:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 266872 kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
Bug#266872: [i386] [20040816] [netinstall] hwconfig shows minor error
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686'.
> severity 266872 minor
Bug#266872: [i386] [20040816] [netinstall] h
I repeated the installation attempt with the new daily build, with the
same result as before.
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-09-20/sparc64/netboot/2.6/boot.img
Date: Tue Sep 21 11:03:42 CEST 2004
uname -a:
Linux (none) 2.6.8-1-sparc64 #1 Sat Aug 28 04
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 10:21:48PM +0200, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> Dear all,
> I tried d-i to setup a Debian GNU/Linux on a laptop where I have Fedora
> Core 2 installed. As a test I decided to use FC2 boot loader so I went
> back to the menu and went on without a boot loader installed by d-i
Package: countrychooser
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n d-i
As a side effect of the use of a master file for French translations, the
countrychooser templates currently use ISO-8859-1 encoding.
As they are merged with translations from iso-codes in a way which does not
allow using different encodings
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040802 netboot
Date: 2004-09-19
Severity: normal
Method: rarp+tftp+http from http.us.debian.org
Machine: Sun Netra T105
Processor: TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
Memory: 311296k
Root Device: Seagate ST39102LC, symbios SCSI
Partition Table:
Dis
51 matches
Mail list logo
