> > I guess this library should be added to libc6.udeb.
>
> You are right.
Adding ssh is good idea. No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb
size. Is it acceptable for considering floppy size?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Quoting Kruno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
> my name is Kruno and I am asking for acitivation of Croatian language (hr_HR)
> translation for debian-installer. Few days ago I downloaded last sarge netinst
That's great news. I was desperating finding a Croatian (hr) translator...
> image and to my su
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.4
Locale : ar_DZ (Arabic/Algeria)
Image : netinst sid_d-i 20040712
Priority : high
Result : 1st stage OK, though maybe shaping problems and no
harakat ("accents")
Display is left to right in 2nd stage
-
Testing the latest 20040712 sid_d-i images with the ar_DZ locale, I
have confirmed that Arabic, Hebrew and Farsi are currently wrongly
displayed in 2nd stage : the display is left to right, while first
stage was correct.
There is also a doubt about proper shaping in 1st stageas well as
Arabic
Yes, it does fail with the suggested command. I have
attached the requested file.
Thank you.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail + set -e
+ test -f /sbin/discover
+ CONFFILE=/e
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> we get more and more installation reports concerning the amd64 installer
> every day on [EMAIL PROTECTED] wich are not filed in the bts because the
> amd64 installer is not official yet.
>
> The amd64 installer suffers the same problems as the i386 one, just
> limited
Frans Pop wrote:
> The 20040430 images are pretty old. A lot has happened since then.
I missed the versio number before. The main happening is we've switched
to the 2.4.26 kernel, so those floppys won't be able to find any kernel
module udebs for 2.4.25 in the archive, and won't work.
> Could you
Hello,
prep packages are broken. The line:
kernel-patch-2.4.25-powerpc-2.4.25/debian/rules:
sed -e 's/=V/$(basever)-$*/g' -e 's/=A/powerpc/g' -e 's,=D,/boot,g' ...
is not working as expected, =D is not replaced by /boot and
post{rm,inst} pre{rm,inst} try to access /=D, which doesn't exists.
T
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb standard
debian-installer
CDROM support
This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
(new) ext3-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb standard debian-installer
EXT3 filesystem support
This package contains t
Hi,
we get more and more installation reports concerning the amd64 installer
every day on [EMAIL PROTECTED] wich are not filed in the bts because the
amd64 installer is not official yet.
The amd64 installer suffers the same problems as the i386 one, just
limited to the 2.6 kernel flavour and th
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_0.01_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_0.01.dsc
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_0.01.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.7-1-itanium-smp-di_0.01_ia64.udeb
nic-shared-module
> The machine boots into Windows 98, presumably using some kind of disc,
> so the hardware does exist.
Moreover, installation using
/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386/3.0.23-2002-05-21/images-1.44 is
working nicely. So that's a regression in sarge, though perhaps all it
needs is a boot argument t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 259292 debian-cd
Bug#259292: debian-installer: IA64 ISOs should behave like EFI boot media
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debian-cd'.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 242290 [sparc] [20040404] [businesscard] CD boot failure on Sun Fire 280R
Bug#242290: Sun Fire 280R
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 242308 [i386] [20040402] [netinst] pcmcia networking does not come up on
> boot after install
Bug#242308: installa
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I'm trying to install on an IBM ThinkPad 570 with the floppy images
> from /debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040430/images/floppy
> but the disc seems to be invisible: /proc/ide only contains drivers,
> there's no /dev/hda, etc.
>
> Any advice for me?
Can you
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20040712 businesscard sid
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: thu Jul 13 16:17:59 CEST 2004
Method: I installed by booting from the businesscard sid CD. The base system
wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 23:05, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I'm trying to install on an IBM ThinkPad 570 with the floppy images
> from /debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040430/images/floppy
> but the disc seems to be invisible: /proc/ide only
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-13 Image from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i38
6-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux geocentric 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jun 24 12:42:08 EDT 2004 i686
unknown
Date: 2004-07-13, 12:00pm CST
Method: I use
The same thing has happened in another install using d-i (#258889, merged with
#249371).
From the partman log file:
Model: TOSHIBA MK2016GAP
Path: /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
Sector size: 512
Sectors: 39070080
Sectors/track: 63
Heads: 240
Cylinders: 2584
Partition table: yes
Type: loop
Hello,
Here are 2 patches to make linux support the old IBM RS/6000 E30
(ppc604e) and 240 (doral). The support was written by Leigh Brown and
adapted from the patch present in the website:
http://home.tiscali.be/philipa/rs6000.html
These machines are old, but usable nowadays. Here in brazil we ha
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
elilo, the bootloader for ia64, supports boot menus similar to those
of its isolinux/syslinux counterparts. it would be nice if we had a
d-i boot screen and help menus similar to those on x86.
for an example implementation, you can checkout the Enable
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 22:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Here is the content of the /var/log/partman. Perhaps you can make more
> out of this than me, but to me it just looks like it reports a plainly
> incorrect partition table.
>
> /bin/partman: *
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
ia64 isos should be bootable via this path from the EFI Boot Manager:
Boot Option Maintenace Menu
-> Boot from a File
-> Debian Inst [Acpi(HWP0002,0)/Pci(2|0)/Ata(Primary,Master)/CDROM(
I believe the magic for this is the bootia64.efi file, whi
I'm trying to install on an IBM ThinkPad 570 with the floppy images
from /debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040430/images/floppy
but the disc seems to be invisible: /proc/ide only contains drivers,
there's no /dev/hda, etc.
Any advice for me?
The bit of the installer where it's telling you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 249371 Partition table incorrectly detected as loop instead of msdos
Bug#249371: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
> severity 249371 important
Bug#249371: Partition table incorrectly detected as loop instead of msdos
Severity set to `important'.
retitle 249371 Partition table incorrectly detected as loop instead of msdos
severity 249371 important
assign 258889 partman
severity 258889 important
merge 249371 258889
thanks
This problem seems to be going around all of a sudden...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:35:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Also found this in the end in /var/log/messages. Don't know if it's related:
No matching physical volumes found
No volume groups found
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
If you want a binary dump of my partition table, tell me how you want it
and I'll try to get it.
/Magnu
Here is the content of the /var/log/partman. Perhaps you can make more
out of this than me, but to me it just looks like it reports a plainly
incorrect partition table.
/bin/partman: ***
/lib/partman/init.d/01unsupported:
*
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:34:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259252: Soyo SY-K7VME + AMD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237731 kernel
Bug#237731: discover: causes callback in fs/buffer.c on linux 2.6.3
Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `kernel'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 249380 discover1 should know how to pass module arguments gleaned from the
> lst files
Bug#249380: discover1: Discover doesn't detect TV-card
Changed Bug title.
>
End of m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There was a useful suggestion in this installation-report.
Submitter was unclear if "success reports" for d-i would be welcome based on
current text.
After current text:
After using the Debian-Installer, please send us an installation report
usin
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:22:02 -0400, Todd Charron wrote:
> I just tried out the debian-installer netinst image from July 12, 2004
> (test candidate 1). The initial setup worked fine, went through the
> partitioning etc all went smooth. When prompted for the intial reboot
> (grub was written to t
The grub parser failed because the SuSE menu.lst uses
(hdn,m)/path/to/file notation, which it does not understand, as noted in
its TODO.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 259264 installation-reports
Bug#259264: Install does not detect CDROM
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 259267 grub-installer
Bug#259267: debian-installer: Grub Error #25 after first reboot
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'.
> severity 259267
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Colin,
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 13:15, Colin Watson wrote:
> It's not meant for this purpose. openssh-client-udeb (if all the
> dependencies are available as udebs now) is more what you want.
How is one supposed to load this udeb?
I've just tried
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:22:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The debconf reorg is scheduled, but I *don't* have plans to introduce a
> > spurious dependency of xserver-xfree86 on discover, mdetect, or read-edid.
>
> Have you considered doing an xfree86-config package th
Package: install
Version: 7-12-04
The sarge-i386-netinst.iso file from current (dated 7-12-04) is burnt to a
CDROM.
The CDROM is installed and the computer is rebooted;
After booting from the CDROM the display shows the Debian splash screen;
a language is chosen (English);
a country or re
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
I just tried out the debian-installer netinst image from July 12, 2004
(test candidate 1). The initial setup worked fine, went through the
partitioning etc all went smooth. When prompted for the intial reb
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:21:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259190: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
The bug submitter sayd in a private message that the data in the
partition are still there but the geometry of the disk has changed.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You sent a very usefull installation report, thank you.
On 27.V.2004 Pete Shinners wrote:
>
> First, I spent a few times going into the partion tool. Each time
> starting I got a long pause on the "partition scan". Checking with the
> other terminals I noticed it was scanning partitions on
> /
Michael Kahle wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance, but I am testing out the debian-installer on a
> IBM Intellistation Z-Pro 6221-1PU and I am running into some difficulties.
> I would like to submit a install report, but I do not understand how I
> should send these.
>
> I found the template:
> h
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 7-8-2004 Daily build image
of sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux elisa 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12
13:19:06 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 7-8-2004
Method: Used the cd image to install, booted initially
from the cd, no
proxy, connected t
This bug seams caused by parted detecting "loop" instead of "msdos"
partition table. As a result the user sees only one partition occupying
the whole disk. I reported this but to parted as #259248.
Anton Zinoviev
On 17.V.2004 at 03:45 (+0200) Jens Ruehmkorf wrote:
>
> Debian-installer-version:
Environment: VmWare
Platform : i386
Kernel : 2.6
Locale : fr_FR
Image : netinst sid_d-i 20040712
Priority : high
Result : No special problem. This seems to confirm that Latin-1
languages default installs are currently OK, either 2.4
or 2.6
This will
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hola Joey Hess!
>
> > > What can be the reason for this?
> > Dunno, can you send us the syslog please?
>
> Uhm, which syslog? The d-i one? The box has been installed with woody
> installer by now. But I could ask my friend to run the installer again
> tocopy some f
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 06:52:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This is a fundamental misdesign. It should be reverted.
>
> Please provide a better interface.
I don't understand why cdebconf needs to be shut down before reboot at
all; we have X_SAVE.
--
see shy jo
signat
Branden Robinson wrote:
> The debconf reorg is scheduled, but I *don't* have plans to introduce a
> spurious dependency of xserver-xfree86 on discover, mdetect, or read-edid.
Have you considered doing an xfree86-config package that is separate
from X and depends on the right set of tools? I like t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 240722 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] success, minor problems, lilo failed
Bug#240722: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 240744 [i386] [beta3] [netinst] success
Bug#240744: Successful Sarge install via Beta-3 installer
Change
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:51:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 242008 moreinfo
Bug#242008: installation report with sarge and the new installer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:34:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:44:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing dup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:10:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:26:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:25:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:35:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing successful report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:20:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
I'd like to follow up on this installation report you made some time
ago. Since then, I'm pretty sure we've fixed the /dev/ida problems.
Could you try again with a current daily build of the installer, and let
us know if it works.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The man-db problems are resolved. Someone who knows powerpc should check
that the other problems reported in this one are fixed.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:52:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:40:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:50:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing successful report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:31:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:30:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:49:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:19:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:25:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:50:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:58:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing duplicate report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 240963 moreinfo
Bug#240963: Sarge Beta 3 Report
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 240458 debian-cd
Bug#240458: [i386] [20040320] [CD] no network configuration with full CD
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.
> tags 240458
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239151 moreinfo
Bug#239151: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to detect NIC
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 238911 grub-installer
Bug#238911: grub-installer does not activate MBR, where grub got installed
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 238610 grub-installer
Bug#238610: [i386] [20040317] [netinst] grub install problem
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 235691 moreinfo
Bug#235691: [i386] [20040301] [businesscard] success with problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 235342 moreinfo
Bug#235342: [i386] [20040224] [netinst] pcmcia network problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239821 moreinfo
Bug#239821: [i386] [beta3] [CD] (unspecified) problems during base-config
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 235540 moreinfo
Bug#235540: [i386] [unknown] [floppy] various problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 238911 d-i
Bug#238911: grub-installer does not activate MBR, where grub got installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 240367 moreinfo
Bug#240367: [i386] [20040319] [businesscard] various problems
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239053 moreinfo
Bug#239053: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] grub problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 234804 moreinfo
Bug#234804: [i386] [20040103] [CD] generally success
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 236845 moreinfo
Bug#236845: [i386] [20040308] [netinst] pcmcia problem with installed kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 238527 choose-mirror
Bug#238527: [i386] [20040317] [businesscard] manual mirror selection is hard to find
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `choose-mirr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 239929
Bug#239929: installation-report
Bug#239926: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] success, LVM problem
Disconnected #239929 from all other report(s).
> close 239929
Bug#239929: installation-report
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 237843 d-i
Bug#237843: [i386] [beta2] [netinst] problem detecting Xircom Cardbus 56k Modem/10-100
Ethernet card combo [rbem56g-100]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 238325 base-config
Bug#238325: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] success, but base-config problems
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
>
End of mes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 234506 hw-detect
Bug#234506: [i386] [beta2] [netinst] failed to find Xircom network card
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'.
>
End of messag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 227917 [alpha] [20040114] [netinst] Boot fails on Alpha DS 10 with illegal
> instruction
Bug#227917: Boot fails on Alpha DS 10 with illegal instruction
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 229772 [powerpc] [20040125] [netinst] various problems
Bug#229
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239464 moreinfo
Bug#239464: [i386] [beta3] [businesscard] pcmcia/kernel mismatch, wrong kernel,
install failure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 234687 moreinfo
Bug#234687: Boot fails on g5 desktop
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239784 d-i
Bug#239784: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] didn't load aacraid or detect graphics card
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> reassign 239784 discover1-data
Bug#239784
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 238665 discover1-data
Bug#238665: installation-report for d-i 20040315
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'.
> tags 238665 d-i
Bug#238665
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
