Hi,
the latest bug which was mentioned explicitely in our docs was now
closed. This might be good news - but it is closed in a way we do not
really like. The bug was filed to *add* Custom Distributions which
are not in tasksel but it was solved in *removing* the CDD (debian-jr)
from tasksel. So
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta4
uname -a: 2.6.6-1-686
Date: 6/19/04 11 pm
Method: CD - network: http://ftp.debian.org
Machine: homebrew
Processor: Athlon 1.33MHZ
Memory: 512 DDR
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% M
The latest daily image avilable at
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/
is for 20040619.
I was hoping to test if the new silo fixed the initrd problem on some
sparc64 systems, but the 20040619 image has the old silo.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But now keyboard is in UTF-8 mode, so bytes are passed to the kernel
> without conversion, and 0x00 0xe9 is sent instead of its UTF-8
> representation 0xc3 0xa9.
> If eacute is replaced by its Unicode notation U+00E9 in keymap
> file, everything works fine now. But this keymap cannot be used
>
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If eacute is replaced by its Unicode notation U+00E9 in keymap
> file, everything works fine now. But this keymap cannot be used
Uh, I confirm, it work with:
keycode 3 = U+00E9 +two tildeEacute
alt ke
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:37:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256111: tc1 hppa cdrom install success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
[Christian Perrier]
> So, this bug should finally be assigned to console-data with the
> request for creating Unicode keymaps for layouts which don't have
> one (Recai mentions Turkish for instance)?
This is a solution. IMO a better one is to patch loadkeys as explained
in my previous post. Here
Hello,
I was thinking about this issue and to me, a more logical solution is
list only the same kernels what was used for installation *but* if
this is not available in CD or for installation then list any other.
What you think about this?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Package: debian-installer
Version: Debian Installer Sarge Test Candidate 1
I installed Debian sarge using the boot cd with the debian sarge installer tc1. I skipped the network configuration part of the installer because my network card is being used behind an adsl modem for connecting via PPPOE.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: tc1
Method: CD-ROM
Booted from internal cdrom (SESCSI.2.0)
Machine: HP B180
(all details are same as previous installs using netboot)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Conf
Hi,
I've been dobbed in to give a talk on d-i at next month's CLUG meeting.
I was planning on giving a brief blurb about the history behind the
installer (where we've come from, where we're trying to go) and then launch
into a couple of example installs. The main outcome desired is to get
feedbac
Package: partman-jfs
Version: 2
yaboot cannot boot a kernel stored on a JFS partition, but the
partman-jfs doesn't prevent me from (or warn me about) doing so.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: partman
Version: 40
After the base system failed to install, I went back to partman to
reformat the root partition. I selected the root partition and
verified that the usage method was "format the partition", but
when I exited partman, it didn't reformat it, which caused the
next attempt
Package: debian-installer
Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-24/floppy/
I sometimes see the following error (2 out of the 4 most recent
tries):
Setting up ed (0.2-20) ...
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
install-info(/usr/share/info/ed.info.gz): read g
Can anyone read this? I've had problems posting emails for the past
24 hours. I just want to see if I get this message sent to me from
the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:13:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Look at the insanity on a powerpc CD some time. Increasing that by a
> > > further 50% will make it u
Hello Thomas, Josh,
Ahh. I think I now see the root of the confusion.
With my setup DHCP does _not_ fail the first time it is tried, as seems to be
assumed in the code. It succeeds within the first 20% of the progress bar and
I get a perfectly usable lease for the first stage setup.
After that d
Package: base-config
Version: 2.31
Severity: normal
Tages: patch
In the debconf-seed menu script, the logic to test for an invalid seed file
is reversed:
--- lib/menu/debconf-seed 2004-06-24 22:12:44.0 +0100
+++ ../../base-config-2.31.mcb/lib/menu/debconf-seed2004-06-24
13:02:53.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:46:56AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > I maintain that "expert" should map to DEBCONF
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:46:56AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > I maintain that "expert" should map to DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium, and that
> > > it should be DEBCONF_PRIORITY=*low*
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:13:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Applying above patch should give releaf to many old DELL users. Of
> > course we should do some code clean up such as redirecting output to
> > /dev/null instead.
>
> Or to syslog. I'd be gad to apply this patch if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current >
uname -a:
Date: <6/24/2004 15:00>
Method:
Machine:
Processor: Pentium III
Memory: 256 Mb
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Output of
Hi Debian Install Team
Today, for the first time in my life, I had the fealing that
was once described as "standing on the shoulders of Giants". I used
the installer to install sarge with pxeboot on a Soekris net4801 with
a blanco harddisk. It almost went without a glitch. Four points:
the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255739 boot-floppies
Bug#255739: Possible Bug
Warning: Unknown package 'cd'
Warning: Unknown package '1'
Warning: Unknown package 'debian'
Warning: Unknown package 'alpha'
Warning: Unknown package 'bought'
Warning: Unknown package 'from'
Warnin
Mario Lang wrote:
> Quoting the svn log for build/config/floppy/access/speakup.cfg
>
> >
> >r16052 | joeyh | 2004-05-23 01:53:41 +0200 (Sun, 23 May 2004) | 3 lines
> >
> >drop the kernel back to 2.4.24, until the 2.4.26-speaku
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Applying above patch should give releaf to many old DELL users. Of
> course we should do some code clean up such as redirecting output to
> /dev/null instead.
Or to syslog. I'd be gad to apply this patch if you do that, I don't
like the /error.log stuff.
--
see shy jo
signa
Dear Customer
Thank you very much for your message.
Your e-mail will be processed as soon as possible.
Our offices are open on working days during office hours.
If you would like to update this question, please reply to this
message and enter your request in the space below:
[===> Please enter y
mcqvoujt
Get all the software imaginable for prices substantially lower than in stores.
Our software is 7-10 times cheaper than sold by our competitors.
Examples:
50USD Windows XP Professional
50USD Norton System Works 2003
60USD Adobe Photoshop 7.0
60USD Freehand MX 11
50USD Windows 2000
Hi.
Quoting the svn log for build/config/floppy/access/speakup.cfg
>
>r16052 | joeyh | 2004-05-23 01:53:41 +0200 (Sun, 23 May 2004) | 3 lines
>
>drop the kernel back to 2.4.24, until the 2.4.26-speakup kernel enters the
>arch
Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Configuring the network via DHCP only seemed to happen properly
> if it worked the first time. That is, if, say, the network cable
> was disconnected at first and I connected it then told it to
> retry, it appeared to not bother retrying and simply proceeded
> immediately to the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 255984 d-i
Bug#255984: minor comments on debian-installer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> reassign 255984 netcfg
Bug#255984: minor comments on debian-installer
Bug r
reopen 255545
thanks
Whups, I meant to close #255408.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Mario Lang wrote:
> /lib/debian-installer.d/S25env2debconf runs env2debconf from
> rootskel, which already tries to load the frontend module (i.e., check
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND, fallback to /etc/cdebconf.conf defaults (newt), export
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND). So when S50frontend is run, it falls through as
>
reassign 254754 grub
severity 254754 wishlist
retitle 254754 add feature for dummy titles in menu
thanks
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:26:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> That could be a possibility, yes. This is even maybe what is done
> currently (it's a bit of time since I did a dual boot
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 13:32:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 254754 grub
Bug#254754: Please allow for a "title" entry in menu.lst
Bug reassigned from package `grub-installer' to `grub'.
> severity 254754 wishlist
Bug#254754: Please allow for a "title" entry in menu.lst
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> ret
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 255545
Bug#255545: hppa d-i install success!
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:22:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256040: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
> Why don't you indent the non-dummy titles? Then the dummy one won't look to
> the user as a real option.
That could be a possibility, yes. This is even maybe what is done
currently (it's a bit of time since I did a dual boot test of d-i)
The user report here insisted on an "option" which was
reassign 256005 mdcfg
thanks
* Pascal EISELE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-24 12:29]:
> I've tryed a setup with some RAID partition. An error occurs when
> the package raidtools is installed. It says that I need raidtools2.
> I'm using 2.6 kernel...
Yes, this has been fixed in recent sid images.
h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 256005 mdcfg
Bug#256005: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `mdcfg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> A standard VmWare test with fr_FR on 20040623 sarge_d-i netinst did
> not show any specific issue.
2.4 kernel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Standard fr+FR install in VmWare OK with sid_d-i 20040623 netinst
(this was a 2.4 install)
Add to this a successful 2.6 en+CA install
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
> Well, here are some more settings--perhaps they may help you track down
> the problem:
After running exactly this setup in VmWare, I finally ended with
"date" showing a time in EDT timezone.
and /etc/localtime was properly linked to /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada/Eastern
So, I'm afraid investiga
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255940 elilo-installer
Bug#255940: elilo_installer fails on sarge
Bug reassigned from package `elilo_installer' to `elilo-installer'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
reassign 255892 lvmcfg
thanks
* Sylvain COUTANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-23 19:13]:
> /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 on /target/boot (ext2,16MB)
>
> Got an error message saying : "unable to install the selected kernel
> (kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386)."
> Console #3 have the following er
Standard fr+FR install in VmWare OK with sid_d-i 20040623 netinst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A standard VmWare test with fr_FR on 20040623 sarge_d-i netinst did
not show any specific issue.
The line drawing problem is definitely away in sarge_d-i for fr_FR and
all other Latin installs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Found it.
/lib/debian-installer.d/S25env2debconf runs env2debconf from
rootskel, which already tries to load the frontend module (i.e., check
DEBIAN_FRONTEND, fallback to /etc/cdebconf.conf defaults (newt), export
DEBIAN_FRONTEND). So when S50frontend is run, it falls through as
a no-op since tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 255369 ethdetect
Bug#255369: installation-reports: TC1 cannot insmod network modules - installation
cycles
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `ethdetect'.
>
End of m
Accepted:
base-config_2.32.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.32.dsc
base-config_2.32.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.32.tar.gz
base-config_2.32_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.32_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 225344 240715 2
base-config_2.32_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.32.dsc
base-config_2.32.tar.gz
base-config_2.32_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:26:22AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> H, I'm afraid there is a little misunderstanding
> here. grub-installer really uses the "title" option of course.
>
> However, as Debian Installer tries to detect other operating systems
> on the installed system, and add
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240715: fixed in base-config 2.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251900: fixed in base-config 2.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> System came up fine! Used tasksel to install a few tasks with
> no issues. The only conceivable problem is that in my xterm running
> minicom to the B180, tasksel does not highlight what you currently have
> tabbed, which meant I had to play guessing games to figure out
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 23 June 2004
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux laptop 2.6.6-1-686 #1 Wed May 12 14:57:57 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: <23 June 2004 17:00 GMT>
Method:
Machine:
Proces
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225344: fixed in base-config 2.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:32:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254036: fixed in base-config 2.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:28:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Bug#255408: first boot of new hppa install failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
OEM s0ftware fact0ry 4
Loads of cool s0ft at incredibly l0w pice
MS Windows XP Professional
Microsoft Office 2003 Professional
MS Encarta Encyclopedia Delux 2004
Macromedia Studio MX 2004
Adobe Photoshop 7.0
.
Many More Choice
http://vnvi.CKLIBCDN.info/?eZMjM_eJPil7wKe
warty emblematic art
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 256001 d-i
Bug#256001: cdebconf: Fails to autoselect available text frontend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
I'm using syslinux or more precisely pxelinux to boot a system from a
floppy. That works perfectly and the system finds a dhcp/bootp server
just fine. However when I get to the secondary booting in dbootstrap it
cannot get a dhcp address. Does anyone know why?
Also when I get to a network insta
Hi
How can I install Debian when I have
a raid controller?
regards Konstantin
|| On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:55:43 +0200
|| Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cp> Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> +Template: base-installer/progress/preparing
>> +Type: text
>> +_Description: Preparing to install the Debian base system
Hi bro
I have toubles with police now :( they installed
something on my computer and spy on me
Download this program
http://www.fojal.privacykeeper.info/ip/
and check your computer ASAP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
I am confused about all this hostname stuff.
I think that we should stop calling the argument of "send host-name"
a "hostname". Instead let's call it a "host-name". The host-name
can be different from the hostname. See #239591.
I take it we want to do something like this:
Try DHCP
If
I am trying to install from unstable with the network images available at
http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/images/daily/netboot/boot.img
Also trying to install from testing gives me the old aboot error saying
/boot is not and ext2. With unstable i don't get that error. But get the
debootstrap
I have a Dell Inspiron 8600 with a Maxtor 80GB HDD in a USB
2.0/Firewire 400 enclosure. I know that this computer can boot USB
devices. I want to be able to install Debian on the external HDD.
I downloaded and wrote to the disk the 110MB sarge netinst
debian-install image I pulled down yesterday
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254919 d-i
Bug#254919: various comments on 20040615/20040616 in bochs and vmware
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> clone 254919 -1
Bug#254919: various comments on 20040615/20040616 in bochs and vmware
Bug 254919 cloned as bug 256019.
> re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255369 netcfg
Bug#255369: installation-reports: TC1 cannot insmod network modules - installation
cycles
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 239591 236533
Bug#236533: dhcp-client: request support for Dynamic DNS
Bug#239591: Hostname needed for DHCP
Merged 236533 239591.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Christian,
I'm not sure what to say to the fact that you can't reproduce it.
Well, here are some more settings--perhaps they may help you track down
the problem:
Base System Install
-
language setting:
- en (other countries) english
Country:
- Canada
Kernel:
Package:
installation-reportsDebian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.isouname -a: Linux corail 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12
13:19:06 EST 2004 i686 GNU/LinuxDate: 2004-06-24Method: CDROMMachine: PC Athlon XP 2.4 Ghz with Asus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I was also under the impression that
>sparc64 didn't need to load many modules; that most are built into the
>kernel. Perhaps that's wrong or has recently changed though.
The cdrom drivers are needed for all buesinesscard, netinst and full
Package: cdebconf
Severity: important
Now that the kernel boot problem of the d-i access floppy flavour
is cleared up, I found out that cdebconf no longer works out-of-the-box
when there is no newt frontend shared object available.
The access floppy flavour only installs the cdebconf-text fronten
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Strangely, this page mentions sid_d-i as the "daily builds" while the
> > main installer page link in "Daily builds" points to
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ which has
> > *sarge_d-i* builds
>
> Maybe you have an old version of
Quoting Michael Bonert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Debian-installer-version:
>
> 22 June 2004
>
> $ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> 5db3c8d500380d664c748356910a6d2e sarge-i386-netinst.iso
For the record, this is 20040622 sid_d-i
> There appears to be some pro
Kaspersky AV обнаружил, что сообщение
От: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
К: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Копия:
Слепая копия:
Дата: 23 июня 2004 г.
Время: 18:50
Тема: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
содержит вирусы.
Проверьте его средствами Kaspersky AV Scaner.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian-installer-version:
22 June 2004
$ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
5db3c8d500380d664c748356910a6d2e sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(md5sum is okay)
Install Date:
23 June 2004
=
80 matches
Mail list logo
