Quoting Alexander Wirt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: installation-reports
>
> INSTALL REPORT
>
> Debian-installer-version: Release Candidate 1 (downloaded 23.06.04)
Wasn't this "Test Candidate 1" ? There is no Release Candidate" at
this time..:-)
Where did you download this image (just to be
> "lspci" is unavailable. I looked for it on the ramdisk and on the cdrom
> (which was mounted already) but I guess it gets installed later... after
> the hard drive is detected.
That's an interesting problem. Most often, people coming with new
hardware we need lspci output for have another Linu
Quoting Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> reassign 254754 grub-installer
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 07:23:26AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >
> > GRUB maintainer(s), comments?
> >
> > Of course, if grub-installer misuses menu.lst and such possibility
> > already exists, please
Could someone with enough hardware support skills have a look at
#255388?
This seems obviously to be a lack of hardware support problem. There
are, I guess all needed informations here, but I'm unable to analyse
myself (and for instance assign this to discover1-data of
kernel-image-di).
--
Quoting Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> +Template: base-installer/progress/preparing
> +Type: text
> +_Description: Preparing to install the Debian base system
Will this be a progress dialog title, or information?
If this is a title, we'd better use "Preparation of the Debian base
system
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > OK ar_EG 2.4 (but no RTL in 2nd-stage...not d-i related)
>
> It is d-i related, to the extent that libfribidi0 will need to be
OK. In my opinion, this was not directly d-i related as this is not a
thing (getting bidified slang in testing) that the
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: i386/beta4
uname -a: Linux blp 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: June 24, 2004
Method: Installed with `linux26' command line, booting from USB
2.0 CD-RW with minimal CD-ROM, rest of insta
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 110mb image from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a:
Date: 2004-06-24 1:48 pm
Method: Boot off CD, network install from mirror.optusnet.com.au, not proxied
boot "linux26" kernel initially, then switched back to de
Hi bro
I have toubles with police now :( they installed
something on my computer and spy on me
Download this program
http://www.tnwgl.privacykeeper.info/ip/
and check your computer ASAP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Test Candidate 1
uname -a: Linux friday 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 6/22/04 17:30
Method: Booted from 110M CD with Debian base on CD. Net Install (http)
for rest, primary mirror kernel.org
Machine: Old
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:32:45PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > >http://people.debian.org/~osamu/hackdi
> > >
> > > It would be great if it's linked from
>
I have a Dell Inspiron 8600 with a Maxtor 80GB HDD in a USB
2.0/Firewire 400 enclosure. I know that this computer can boot USB
devices. I want to be able to install Debian on the external HDD.
I downloaded and wrote to the disk the 110MB sarge netinst
debian-install image I pulled down yesterday
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 07:44:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> OK ar_EG 2.4 (but no RTL in 2nd-stage...not d-i related)
It is d-i related, to the extent that libfribidi0 will need to be
installed by base-installer on platforms where RTL is needed. The other
factor, of course, is that the v
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Why is this bug on removing the aptitude dependency on base-config
> tagged pending? The source in CVS still depend on aptitude, and I see
> no changelog entries indicating anyone removing the dependency.
I had it fixed in the newtasksel branch in base-config svn. I'v
Hello,
Bellow, I reproduce the output from the Athlon 2.4+, 512 MB ram, Asus A7S333
motherboard.
The system is running Conectiva Linux 9.0.
I hope this help.
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machado
[EMAIL PROTECTED] andremachado]# /sbin/lspci -n
00:00.0 Class 0600: 1039:0745 (rev 01)
00:01.0 Class 0604:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > >http://people.debian.org/~osamu/hackdi
> >
> > It would be great if it's linked from
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>
> I asked it to Matt
Folks,
I'm attaching a new version of patch. Can someone comment about it?
=== debian/postinst
==
--- debian/postinst (/base-installer/trunk) (revision 9)
+++ debian/postinst (/base-installer/local) (revision 9)
@@ -150,6 +15
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:15:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:00:14PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]:
> > > (5) Assuming grub and use a graphical splashscreen like lilo can, I am
> > > surprised you did n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 254754 grub-installer
Bug#254754: Please allow for a "title" entry in menu.lst
Bug reassigned from package `grub' to `grub-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Release Candidate 1 (downloaded 23.06.04)
uname -a: 2.4.25-powerpc (sorry I already replaced the kernel ;))
Date: 23.06.04 14:00 CEST
Method:
I download the business card image and installed over the net from
ftp2.de.debian.o
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:00:14PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bruno Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-11 18:28]:
> > (5) Assuming grub and use a graphical splashscreen like lilo can, I am
> > surprised you did not make grub use one to make the boot process prettier.
> > If we want
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 06:03:44PM +0200, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
>
> Package: grub
> Version: 0.93+cvs20031021-8
>
> I just installed Debian GNU/Linux using the new Debian Installer, using
> the language "sv_SE Svenska (Sverige)". One part of the screen "Installera
> startladdaren (boot loader)
"lspci" is unavailable. I looked for it on the ramdisk and on the cdrom
(which was mounted already) but I guess it gets installed later... after
the hard drive is detected.
I did write down the message that came up during hardware detection though.
It said: "Unable to load some modules." Missin
martin f krafft wrote:
> What's the logic for selection of the base system source repository?
packages/base-installer/debian/postinst get_mirror_info
if [ -f /cdrom/.disk/base_installable ]; then
else
fi
How logical this really is, I don'
martin f krafft wrote:
> What's the purpose of choose-mirror on the netinst CD? I can select
> a mirror as much as I want, the base system is still installed from
> CD, I can't access net-retriever anywhere, and in base-config, the
> previous mirror selection is not taken into account.
>
> So why
Christian Perrier wrote:
> B) broken sparc64 module loading (fix: busybox-cvs 20040415-3)
> NEEDS also netcfg to be pushed. Is it release quality?
>
> Lot of discussion around this point : is netcfg release quality or
> not?
> Indirectly, sparc64 module loading depends on this, so deeply test
Blars Blarson wrote:
> In other words, a version that is known to be unusable is a better
> test candidate than one that may be broken. :-(
It's fairly common in release management to choose the evil you know
over the evil you don't. The unstable netcfg is still a constantly
moving target, featur
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:22:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'll bet that architecture removals need to be done by hand for udebs.
Not only for udebs. At least if I understand elmo correctly.
> Can someone (Waldi?) get me a complete list of obsolete s390 udebs in
> sarge to remove?
- netcfg
- n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering if there's a good unofficial cd image for a cdinstall that
> I might be able to use on my aging laptop.
>
> I was trying the sarge netinst with grub,
>
> rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:dnl/sarge-i386-netinst.iso /boot/
> mount /boot/sarge-i386-netinst.iso /mn
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: BETA 4
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.25-1-386 #2
Date: 2004-06-23
Method: Boot from sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Machine: VMWare workstation 4.5
Processor: P4
Memory: 96 MB
Root Device: Buslogic SCSI
Root Size/partition table:
Made an LVM Install :
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> the following udebs are currently in testing, but out of sync between
> architectures, and should be resynced for the release candidate:
Note that there's an automatically generated page with this info and
much more at http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html
Accepted:
tasksel_2.01.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.01.dsc
tasksel_2.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.01.tar.gz
tasksel_2.01_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.01_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 103363 105718 142873 165628 186085 192747 202878
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Done directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb: old version (0.17) in unstable >= new version
(0.17) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy already in
Christian Perrier wrote:
> The daily builds section links to a dedicated page
> (www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/builds) explaining the
> differences between sid_d-i and sarge_d-i
>
> Strangely, this page mentions sid_d-i as the "daily builds" while the
> main installer page link in "Daily b
tasksel_2.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.01.dsc
tasksel_2.01.tar.gz
tasksel_2.01_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Christian Perrier wrote:
> This leads me to one quesiton : why does the current sarge_d-i image
> claims (when hitting F1 at the boot prompt) that it was built on
> 20040528?
>
> Is this because the netboot never change since then (but some packages
> may have been pushed into testing after this d
Hello,
I am trying at two machines.
The output below is for the PII one.
I hope this help.
Regards.
Andre Felipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] andremachado]# /sbin/lspci -n
00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:7180 (rev 03)
00:01.0 Class 0604: 8086:7181 (rev 03)
00:07.0 Class 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 01)
00:07.1 Class 0101:
Joey Hess said:
> Were you using the 2.4 or the 2.6 boot method of the installer (did you
> boot it with "linux26")?
>
> The full text of the error message is important, if you can get it.
I used the default boot method, by just pressing return.
Stupidly, I failed to remember when sending the bug
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 08:10, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I'm currently feeling that the way we currently point
> users to the various builds on the d-i main page
> (http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer) is not optimal.
>
>
> Basically, we have 3 sections here:
>
> -beta4
> -tc1
> -daily b
[Otavio Salvador]
> I'm proposing a patch to add a new hook to be called before
> debootstrap run. This is needed for some CDDs (Debian-NP and
> Liberdade are some examples).
I see no reason not to include such hook
> What you think about the patch?
Here are a few comments:
> + if [ -x
Hello folks,
I'm proposing a patch to add a new hook to be called before
debootstrap run. This is needed for some CDDs (Debian-NP and Liberdade
are some examples).
What you think about the patch?
=== debian/postinst
==
--- debian/po
Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I have a USB/Firewire combo card in my alpha. Under 2.4.26 I can get a
> network interface by simply inserting eth1394 and ohci1394 (and then,
> as usual, bringing it up with ifconfig). This interface has been
> sucessfully used to transfere >1 GB from my PPC based ibook.
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> But as udebs are pushed into testing, what we need more and more of is
> people testing sarge_d-i so that we know if it works, and can decide
> when we're ready to cut tc2. I'm not sure about other archs, but at
> least on alpha, the last remaining *k
Alex Macmillan wrote:
> On starting the installer on an old AMD-K6, the installer failed to
> detect the ISA network card, which I know to work with the "ne" module.
>
> On selecting "ne" to be used when prompted to choose a network module,
> the screen blanked grey, paused, then d-i appeared to
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I suggest that
> -we keep only beta4 on the main d-i page as "official release". Put
> here a link to the "builds" page.
> -we remove the tc1 pointer from the main page
> -we keep a "daily build" paragraph pointing to a new pag
Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> Author: cwryu
> Date: Sat Jun 19 09:57:09 2004
> New Revision: 16980
>
> Modified:
>trunk/packages/choose-mirror/Mirrors.masterlist
> Log:
> Added some information about ftp.sayclub.com -- they've stopped non-i386
> mirror. :-(
>
>
> Modified: trunk/packages/choose-mir
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:36:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Quoting Andre Felipe Machado ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
> This time I tried with this iso file:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> Unfortunately, things went worse.
OK, I think it's time to get details about the hardware.
Could you please po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could we also have a little bit more prominent place for documentation on the
main page (HOWTO, manual an Wiki).
The manual is currently somewhat hidden in the paragraph on Beta4 and What can
I do to help.
FJP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
tag 242547 + patch
Thanks.
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that syslinux incorrectly computes amount of data it
> should read to load a kernel. Attached patch fixes this. With this
> patch applied I can boot from access floppy. Also tested it with
> netboot (P
Hello,
This time I tried with this iso file:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Unfortunately, things went worse.
Now, beyond the previous cdrw/dvd problem, at another machine, a PII (I am
trying at 2 machines, one Athlon and one PII) the installer
Am Mit, den 23.06.2004 schrieb Christian Perrier um 6:42:
> The subject says it all. When someone reports some hardware being
> unsupported, and given (s)he gives uses the output of "lspci -v",
> which package should we assign the bug report to?
It depends.
>
> discover-data?
If the hardware is s
I'm currently feeling that the way we currently point
users to the various builds on the d-i main page
(http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer) is not optimal.
Basically, we have 3 sections here:
-beta4
-tc1
-daily builds
The daily builds section links to a dedicated page
(www.debian.org/
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >http://people.debian.org/~osamu/hackdi
>
> It would be great if it's linked from
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
I asked it to Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
hitnqx xphsulyia emkwpd, fdwouigli. llerhlap obuuzo
kaagzmdno oaeprx rzweiatt dwopopu fqizjumz cjgbqhyzv
tzpxvemb- alsfkhckc qtpeb nzyebnd bzuww, praij
gbcurscb tkbvdks lmwmz fycoplh- wlmax szszxg brqtyq
offdl- ecrgiylo qsarrhnh vojiaab pvnfvvygw vwlpygtlt kmytstx mmpva
rneglxq rjqpfbs krsug
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040622 sarge-sparc-businesscard
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004 sparc64 unknown
Date: 06/23/04
Method: boot cdrom (businesscard) w/o any parameters to silo
Machine: Sun Ultra60, NEC CDROM DRIVE:466 at s
tags 255758 pending
thanks
Quoting Piarres Beobide Egaña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n, d-i, patch
>
>
>
> Here atached debconf template translation update for basque.
> Plese commit when you can.
Commited
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 255758 pending
Bug#255758: discover1: [[INTL:eu] Basque debian template translation update
Tags were: d-i l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:44:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255489: Cannot reproduce this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 255597 grave
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Although this case is fairly exceptional, I have assigned severity important
> until it has been determined whether having e.g. only the first partitions
> the same size on two disks would also result in generating the same I
Quoting Olek Wojnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Here's a link to the Promise driver source I mentioned earlier:
> http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=98&category=driver&os=4
>
> Not sure if that will help.
>
> Any other ideas?
Can you send the output of lspci -v ?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 255597 grave
Bug#255597: Identical disk layout results in identical id's
Bug#241785: On two identical IDE disk with equal number of partitions assigning mount
point of a partition on the second disk assignes a mount point on the first instead.
The subject says it all. When someone reports some hardware being
unsupported, and given (s)he gives uses the output of "lspci -v",
which package should we assign the bug report to?
discover-data?
kernel-image-x-di?
other?
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Quoting wlinks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>I believe I need to burn all 4 .iso files in 1 cd, right?
Which 4 ISO ?
You need bruning only ONE ISO.
First of all, choose the ISO most appropriate for your need, between
tc1 and sarge_d-i or sid_d-i daily builds (OK, the d-i page is
currentrly confusin
Quoting Alexander Nyberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've tried to learn the system much enough to figure out this
> stuff by myself, but it's unfortunately difficult to even understand
> which the normal order of run of the packages/ is, I would appreciate
> some introductary developer/bugfixer documen
Daily builds being back for i386 netinst, I restarted my systematic
tests
Tests in languages other than en or fr of course do not include
proofreading. These are "blind" tests focusing on bad display errors,
charset problems and final test of encoding things on the installed
systems.
Below, the ps
Quoting Ben Bonfil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
> I would like to help you translate the debian-installer to hebrew.
> I never translated any software before but I know C/C++.
> If you can refer me to a decent guide or just explain me I would be glad
> to start working on it.
First of all, you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 239591
Bug#239591: Hostname needed for DHCP
Bug#236533: dhcp-client: request support for Dynamic DNS
Disconnected #239591 from all other report(s).
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Package: installation-reports
Version: Test Candidate 1
flavor:I'm using images from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/tc1/images/hd-media/2.6/
architecture: i386
memory:512 mg
I tried to install Debian sarge on my hard disk from other partition
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:21:56AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:42:25PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:06:34PM +, Goswin von B
Osamu Aoki wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~osamu/hackdi
It would be great if it's linked from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Regards,
ogi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that syslinux incorrectly computes amount of data it
should read to load a kernel. Attached patch fixes this. With this patch
applied I can boot from access floppy. Also tested it with netboot (PXE)
and d-i boot.img. I does not understand however why does syslinux works
with oth
73 matches
Mail list logo
