> main-menu
Uploaded
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/beta4/images/sparc32/netboot/boot.img
downloaded may 21th 2004
uname -a: Linux tw89 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: Sat,
Package: debian-installer
Version: read on
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Hello Debian Installler System Team,
The install-report begins with:
Debian-installer-version:
Can the (build) date be put in the image?
BEGIN RATIONALE
For kernels there is `uname -v`, which prints a string like
#2 Thu
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 4
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.6.5-1-386 #1 Tue Apr 6 22:49:08 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: Sat May 22 13:04:39 ICT 2004
Method: CD-ROM
Machine: Dell Latitude CSx
Processor: Intel p3 500MHz
Memory: 128MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition
> 1. Switching text consoles during install causes tty1 to become garbled
> and unusable. The others remain fine. (This doesn't happen after the
> system boots up the first time.) This happens on real hardware and on
> virtual machines (both VMware and VirtualPC). It occurs both when
> booting
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:24:19PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> The following packages have code changes in svn that have not yet been
> uploaded to unstable. Some have older versions still waiting to enter
> testing, and an upload could further delay those from reaching testing;
> uploads of these s
Mcwilliams,)
75%off for all New Softwares.
WindowXP,Photoshop,Window2003...etcMore
http://www.EBNACD.info/OE017/?affiliate_id=233635&campaign_id=601
digress,and now tell.
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:10:46PM -0700, Henry wrote:
> Machine: Asus P4P800 Deluxe, Intel 865PE Chipset
> Processor: P4 2.8 800MHz FSB w/ HT
> Memory: 1GB DDR 400
> Root Device: SATA (device not detected)
> Root Size/partition table:table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
on May 21, 2004
uname -a:
Date: May 21, 2004 5:55pm
Method: CD-ROM
Machine: Asus P4P800 Deluxe, Intel 865PE Chipset
Processor: P4 2.8 800MHz FSB w/ HT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 247733 di-utils-shell
Bug#247733: main-menu: "Launch a shell" lead to a shell with broken readline
Warning: Unknown package 'd-i-utils-shell'
Bug reassigned from package `d-i-utils-shell' to `di-utils-shell'.
>
End of message, stopping process
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:38:09AM +1000, James Buchanan wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance, but someone said to me "nobody ever runs
> anything but the MacOS on a Macintosh." If this is so, then what
> machines do the PowerPC Debian distributions run on?
Macintoshes. I'm typing this on one righ
OK, I've got it now.
The default _has_ to be 'yes' otherwise PCMCIA would never be activated for
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=high installations.
That leaves the issue why the question has to be asked three times.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 00:18 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> If there is no harm, then why ask the question at all?
>
> And what's all the fuzz about boot option hw-detect/start_pcmcia=false and
> excluding IRQ's and address ranges in /target/etc/pcmcia/config.opts all
> about? I've seen quite a few
On Friday 21 May 2004 23:46, Per Olofsson wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 22:58 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > 2. Starting PCMCIA on systems that don't support it (and even on systems
> > that do) may cause freezes and other unwanted effects.
>
> Really? I have never heard that before. If it's true,
Mckinley,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9008hosting.com/cd/
perchlorate,he curses pushkin.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250299 libdebian-installer4
Bug#250299: cdebootstrap: Fails to run
Bug reassigned from package `libdebian-installer4' to `libdebian-installer4'.
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250299 libdebian-installer4
Bug#250299: cdebootstrap: Fails to run
Bug reassigned from package `cdebootstrap' to `libdebian-installer4'.
>
End of message, stopping process
I do a lot of test installations on my desktop and this error occurs every
time.
I noticed that in the same situation on my (new) laptop I don't get the error.
The logs for installations on both systems are attached.
For the desktop the ext3 check is at iteration 255.
For the laptop the ext3 chec
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 22:58 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> 2. Starting PCMCIA on systems that don't support it (and even on systems that
> do) may cause freezes and other unwanted effects.
Really? I have never heard that before. If it's true, it's still
possible to do detection of PCI-PCMCIA bridges
Please excuse my ignorance, but someone said to me "nobody ever runs
anything but the MacOS on a Macintosh." If this is so, then what
machines do the PowerPC Debian distributions run on? Is it possible to
load up the PowerPC bootable CD image in one of those colourful iMacs
and install?
The soft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 May 2004 17:22, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I wish to see the following bugs fixed in the real Debian release:
>
> #243679: [powerpc] when checking the existing swap partition on
> powerpc/chrp/pegasos, freeze the box at around 37-41%
Frans Pop wrote:
> 4. In general I think things should be started by consciously choosing 'yes'
This is not the general philospohy used by d-i, if it's safe to enable
the hardware, we do. pcmcia is largely safe, it's certianly as safe as
eg, usb which we also load modules for automatically (good
On Friday 21 May 2004 22:33, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > The answer to this question should default to 'no' instead of 'yes'.
>
> Why?
My 2 cents (well, 4 in this case):
1. I would guess most installations are on desktops or servers that don't
support PCMCIA.
2. Starting PCMCIA on sys
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 17:55:12 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 22:04 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The answer to this question should default to 'no' instead of 'yes'.
Why? There isn't any harm in trying to start it on computers without
PCMCIA.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 247765 wishlist
Bug#247765: base system install: kernel menu should offer to not install any kernel
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 235488 pcmcia-cs
Bug#235488: Doesn't recognise "Ark Sky Link Express PA2600"
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `pcmcia-cs'.
>
End of message, stopping proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 236673 base-config
Bug#236673: debian-installer: Set the date if it's too far in the past
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-config'.
>
End of message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 248454 d-i
Bug#248454: debian-installer: mkinitrd fails in alpha
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> reassign 248454 base-installer
Bug#248454: debian-installer: mkinitr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 246483 base-installer
Bug#246483: Automatic SMP kernel on SMP machines.
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-installer'.
> tags 246483 d-i
Bug#246483: A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 247765 base-installer
Bug#247765: base system install: kernel menu should offer to not install any kernel
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `base-installer'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 235488 d-i
Bug#235488: Doesn't recognise "Ark Sky Link Express PA2600"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 247260 cdebconf
Bug#247260: Some characters are garbled in messages
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf'.
> tags 247260 d-i
Bug#247260: Some charac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 247733 d-i-utils-shell
Bug#247733: main-menu: "Launch a shell" lead to a shell with broken readline
Warning: Unknown package 'd-i-utils-shell'
Bug reassigned from package `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 248055 debian-cd
Bug#248055: debian-installer installs compressed kernel that yaboot can't boot; has
/proc problem
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debia
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 17:43:28 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 17:42:15 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Frans Pop wrote:
> The answer to this question should default to 'no' instead of 'yes'.
Why?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 17:40:50 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 17:38:50 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 248234 kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac
Bug#248234: debian-installer: Cannot boot the installer on powerpc
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 247949 normal
Bug#247949: main-menu: eject command not available in installer shell
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250285 hw-detect
Bug#250285: Usability: 'Start PCMCIA Card services' question
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'.
>
End of message, stopping pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
20040521
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux dud 2.6.5-1-686 #5 Fri Apr 30 20:26:13 EST 2004
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040520
The answer to this question should default to 'no' instead of 'yes'.
Also, when answered 'no', it should not be asked again. Currently it will be
asked 3 times (after each hardware detection phase).
(Installation was performed with DEBCONF_PRIORITY=me
12:06 < CIA-3> joshk * r16000 packages/netcfg/netcfg.c: reorganize a
conditional block
Wish it could have been a more pivotal change, like "fix all outstanding
d-i bugs" :|
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 20:47:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250277: Problem with selecting locale during installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
> Since I want my systems to speak english I choose English (other country)
> and then told it I was in Italy... What it happened later was that
> locale failed to configure because it was searching a non-existant "en"
> locale, and that /etc/environment was left empty... :/
I had exactly the same
Accepted:
partman_39.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_39.dsc
partman_39.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_39.tar.gz
partman_39_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_39_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
partman_39_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_39.dsc
partman_39.tar.gz
partman_39_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Accepted:
partman-target_22.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_22.dsc
partman-target_22.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_22.tar.gz
partman-target_22_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_22_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs
Accepted:
partman-auto_21.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_21.dsc
partman-auto_21.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_21.tar.gz
partman-auto_21_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_21_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed
Package: install
Severity: important
Hi,
this morning I installed two sarge machines with the beta4 cd, and for
two times I was hit by problems while selecting the locale (initial part
of the installation).
Since I want my systems to speak english I choose English (other country)
and then told i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 250190 + fixed
Bug#250190: partman-target: help won't show localized messages
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 249786 + fixed
Bug#249786: Should use a minimum size for the root partition
Tags were: pending d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
As of 18:42 UTC 5/21:
13 complete languages 100%
Danish, Basque, Finnish, French, Japanese, Lithuanian, Norwegian Nynorsk
Polish, Brazilian Portuguese, Slovak, Turkish, Ukrainian
Simplified Chinese
18 nearly complete 90%-100%
7 partial 50%-89%
1 very pa
partman-target_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_22.dsc
partman-target_22.tar.gz
partman-target_22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
partman-auto_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_21.dsc
partman-auto_21.tar.gz
partman-auto_21_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
tag 250190 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 19:03:24 +0200
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture: source
Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > > Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> > > the following result:
> >
> > I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
> > of date and indeed pr
tag 249786 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 18:52:33 +0200
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source all
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> > the following result:
>
> I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
> of date and indeed predates the beta 4 release of the installe
Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> the following result:
I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
of date and indeed predates the beta 4 release of the installer?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descript
Hello.
First, this is my first post to this list, and I am not subscribed, so
in any replies please CC me.
Second, many thanks to all that work actively on Debian, I'm a happy
user.
The context is that I (and many others) have a thinkpad laptop, which
has a set of packages dedicated to it in debi
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 06:25:36PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 21.V.2004 at 16:58 (+0200) Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Yep, probably, i will follow up on this. How is the deadline for testing
> > this ?
>
> I don't know. BTW, if the problem is indeed in this function then no
> new upload of
Hello!
Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
the following result:
- booting with just 'linux' from the silo prompt does still fail with
the "unable to mount root fs" error
- booting succedes with 'linux boot=mount,dall rw' from the silo
prompt
- when "Inst
On 21.V.2004 at 16:58 (+0200) Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Yep, probably, i will follow up on this. How is the deadline for testing
> this ?
I don't know. BTW, if the problem is indeed in this function then no
new upload of partman is required.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On 18.V.2004 at 02:37 (-0300) Joey Hess wrote:
> The next release of d-i should not be a beta. It should be something
> that we feel is suitable to be used in a real Debian release.
I wish to see the following bugs fixed in the real Debian release:
#243679: [powerpc] when checking the existing sw
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:50:31PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 21.V.2004 at 16:39 (+0200) Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > could you test this function on a bigger swap partition on your box
>
> Almost all my tests have been on a machine with a big swap partition
> (about 1 gb). Sometimes there w
On 21.V.2004 at 16:39 (+0200) Sven Luther wrote:
>
> could you test this function on a bigger swap partition on your box
Almost all my tests have been on a machine with a big swap partition
(about 1 gb). Sometimes there were several swap partitions.
> I will try calling this function by hand, an
Package: installation-reports
Hello,
this my first installation on powerpc :-)
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: from
http://www.uk.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
following the beta4 link
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta4/sarge-p
owerpc-netin
MEDICIÓN DE RESISTENCIA DE JABALINAS DE PUESTA A TIERRA
Entrega de toda la Documentación exigida por las A.R.T.
Protocolo de medición conforme a NORMA IRAM 2281 y COPIME HyST
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
15-5141-7319
NOTA: Este e-mail se envía por única
vez, no tiene que solicitar ser removido.
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:27:38PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> reassign 243679 partman-basicfilesystems
> severity 243679 important
I believe this is RC severity.
> tags 243679 +help
> thanks
>
> Is it possible that this freeze was caused by too heavy cpu load or by
> some hardware issue?
I
Please forgive this post.
I think all of this was due to the fact that cdrecord was broken and I
probably didn't saw the cd was not burned correctly.
Shame on me ! I'm really sorry for the inconvenience caused.
Regards.
On Friday 21 May 2004 13:46, Meghazi Fabien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing the
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 11:23:31 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.24.really.0.22_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.24.really.0.22_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.24.really.0.22_i386.deb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.24.rea
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.24_s390.udeb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.24_s390.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.24_s390.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.24_s390.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.24_s3
Accepted:
anna_0.062.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.062.dsc
anna_0.062.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.062.tar.gz
anna_0.062_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.062_i386.udeb
load-installer_0.062_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/load-installer_0.062_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 09:06:16 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> merge 249485 249486 249487
Bug#249485: does not display mount points for partitions anymore
Bug#249486: usage method selection is borked
Bug#249487: cannot delete parititon
Bug#2494
anna_0.062_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
anna_0.062.dsc
anna_0.062.tar.gz
load-installer_0.062_all.udeb
anna_0.062_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
libdebian-installer_0.24.really.0.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.24.really.0.22.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.24.really.0.22.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.24.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.24.really.0.22_i386.deb
libdebian-installer_0.24_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.24.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.24.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.24_s390.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.24_s390.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.24_s390.udeb
libdebian-instal
Hi,
If isn't not added yet, the LVM 2.0 installer need to check if the system has a OLD
lvm system installed
on it. Because the old snapshots don't work with new LVM structure (all other things
are backward
compatible). So, if the LVM is requested and LVM 1.0 is found, is better to show a
warn
Package: cdebconf-text-udeb
Version: 0.64
Severity: important
the text frontend does not respect TERM=dumb and tries to diplay
translated entries.
Also it tries to use escape sequences to setup something, this is only
known to work it TERM=linux.
| Y1;24r Y4l Y?25l Y?1c Y?25h Y?0c Y0;10m Y37m Y4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250053 base-config
Bug#250053: Apt doesn't work when doing fresh install of Sarge
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `base-config'.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 250053 debootstrap
Bug#250053: Apt doesn't work when doing fresh install of Sarge
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `debootstrap'.
>
End of message, stoppi
Hi,
I'm testing the new debian installer version 20040520 downloaded at
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/20040520/
During the "install base system" process, the installation was stopped
claiming : "The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1)"
Syslog
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:37:52AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> I want to have people lined up ahead of time for each architecture who
> will be available to do some testing during both time periods. So please
> make a commitment now if you can.
Ok, i will again start doing daily netinst and netboot
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
May 20th
uname -a:
Date: May 21st
Method: CD-Rom boot / network install from MIT
Machine: Generic
Processor: PII 400
Memory: 128
Root Device: Both IDE
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:48:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > installation report revealing a show-stopper:
>
> The show-stopper is the network configuration, right?
yup.
> I'll forward this to the netcfg maintainer. Can you check in
> /var/log/debian-installer/package-versions which v
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 11:01:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250187: libdebian-installer: Unbuildable, missing files?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Hi,
I'm going on experimenting with debian-cd.
I'm wandering if I do really need a full debian mirror in order to
build the ISO. I guess that the only relevant part are the packages
belonging to the base system and the debian-installer section. Isn't
it?
Ideally I'd like to build the
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 06:30:22PM -0400, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > But netwinder has not IP_PNP support
> > and bast has IP_PNP_RARP enable.
>
> I can't speak for "bast" as I have never heard of it. But on netwinder
> the only reason this is disabled is because the fir
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 250190 pending
Bug#250190: partman-target: help won't show localized messages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: partman-target
> Severity: normal
> Version: 22 (svn)
>
> Hi,
>
> I found help messages of partman-target won't show localized messages.
> po files are ready, but templates file doesn't include their
> translations.
>
> This is only happen on p
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: partman-target
> Severity: normal
> Version: 22 (svn)
>
> Hi,
>
> I found help messages of partman-target won't show localized messages.
> po files are ready, but templates file doesn't include their
> translations.
>
> This is only happen on p
Hello List,
i've sent this mail to the list a few days ago
unfortunately withotu receiving any feedback at all. I
take it noone knows what the problem here could be. So
i installed using the unofficial testing images and it
works more or less ok now with the exception of the
boot partition not bei
98 matches
Mail list logo
