Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-28
Severity: normal
When starting an installation by booting from floppy, it first asks for the root disk
then it
asks for the drivers disk. If you answer yes to the drivers question, it loads one
floppy worth
of drivers and continues the in
Hello,
I have been trying, with help from Jeremie Koenig, to get
debian-installer to work on oldworld powermacs, with the help of miboot
using boot floppies. Everything is ready for it, except one package
which is not yet in the archive, and which proved to be legally
nightmarish, so i have some s
Quoting Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > The full size of the installed system (on one unique partition) was
> > exactly 304419kb on this i386 system.
>
> Even after "apt-get clean"?
Didn't try, but I guess this wouldn't change that much
>
> > Directory size in /var (kb):
> > 10
Quoting Dark Trorrr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi. I determined to make the translation of the
> Debian Sarge Installer after Sergio Rua posted in a
> mailing list dedicated to Galician translations a mail
> about this topic from a member of Debian Project. The
> mail has a URL,
> http://people.debia
Google Watch China
Google不仅仅是搜索引擎。我们相信广泛而有效的使用Google将极大促进社会大众学习能力的提高。关键是，它将改变世界每一个人从被动接受知识到主动探索知识的革命性转变，成就新一代先进知识的驾驭者。
Google Watch China（Google观察中国组织）创立于2003年10月，通过Google-Watch-China.org网站、Google狂热分子、Google技术研究者及科学方法，大力倡导：Google Creating Success(Google创造成功)。我们的使命是提高大中华地区Google应用的广度及深度，为该地区
OK, here's an oldworld/boot specific thing:
Your comment about reconfiguring the network gave me the clue I needed.
The problem was that the machine had two ethernet interfaces -- one PCI
card, one built-in on the motherboard. For some reason this was
confusing it and it was not configuring the
Generic viagra: find out why everyone is switching
It's an ideal solution for demanding girlfriends and spouses.
Be a man, and place your order.
Serena Farrelly
http://rd.yahoo.com/SyuhcFwc/*http://www.deliveryisguranteed.com
Go here if you do not want to receive any more promotion mailin
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does Debian use filesystem space?
>
> Today, I did a complete i386 base system installation under VmWare,
> using Debian Installer beta3. This means that, when arrived at tasksel
> screen, I didn't choose any task and just finished the installat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # downgraded because the image is generally bootable
> severity 240575 important
Bug#240575: installation-reports: Fails to boot on Alpha
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
# downgraded because the image is generally bootable
severity 240575 important
thanks
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:20:07AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Version: beta 3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I tried the beta 3 CD on my alpha, it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: discover
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Version: 1.5-2
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Severity: normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Followup-For: Bug #238472
Unknown command
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #238472
severity 238472 critical
retitle 238472 discover should not load i810-tco module
thanks
Having the same problems here, ran debian-installer beta 3 and my system
would hard reset during the installation proces after aroun
Hi. I determined to make the translation of the
Debian Sarge Installer after Sergio Rua posted in a
mailing list dedicated to Galician translations a mail
about this topic from a member of Debian Project. The
mail has a URL,
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/d-i/l10n/gl/, were
the files that shou
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sparc beta3 mini-iso
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-sparc/beta3/images/cdrom-mini.iso
Date: 2004-03-26 16:00
Method: How did you install? mini-iso
What did you boot off? cdrom
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta 3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried the beta 3 CD on my alpha, it doesn't boot.
Here is what happens from the SRM console, the command I used was
"boot dqb"
(boot dqb1.1.1.208.0 -flags 0)
block 0 of dqb1.1.1.208.0 is a v
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've heard there is a lack of installation reports... I'd don't feel like
filing a bug, but I need to vent a little.
Today I was installing Debian on a machine with a Mylex RAID controller.
Everything was running quite smoothly up to the point where the kernel should
install itself... Here's the
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:00 -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> WARNING: Your /etc/fstab does not contain the fsck passno field. I will
> kludge around things for you, but you should fix your /etc/fstab file as
> soon as you can.
>
> And then the boot hangs because the root filesystem is read-on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:08:53 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Let's say this is the minimal installation a user can do when
> answering the default to all question (s)he's asked during an
> installation, then
>
> No idea, indeed, of the method for having a complete default
> system. Maybe by
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040328 00:24]:
> * Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-27 10:10]:
> > >Copy to Baruch Even, the fribidi package maintainer
> > I have done so ; its present in
> > http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/fribidi for testing
> >
> > Will diff out t
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta3 27 March 2004
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: don't get that far
Date: Sat Mar 27 21:08:00 CET 2004
Method: booted from the "100Mb" CDROM
Machine: Dell Inspiron 8100 lapto
On Friday 05 March 2004 21:20, Joey Hess wrote:
> I can reproduce this bug doing an install in greek. Moreover, I can
> reproduce it with the teletype debconf frontend, so it's not a
> problem with whiptail. It seems that this one menu item for MTA
> configuration must be mangled somehow in debconf
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> It seems that this bug continues to appear. I was really busy the
> last weeks and could not do any debian work at all. Which menu item
> did you mean?
> This one: "Configure the Mail Transfer Agent"?
> If it may help, I just found out that the greek translation
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:58:05AM -0700, toff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:35:27PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:01:30PM -0700, toff wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:31:50PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > You had to mount the CD in order to e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 240410 anna
Bug#240410: debian-installer: downloads and unpacks useless kernel image [sparc]
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `anna'.
> severity 240373 normal
Bug#240373: installs kernel-image package
Severity set to `normal'.
On Saturday 27 March 2004 18:52, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> The patch in #232426, fixes the effect in #238765, but it still
> looks like the screen is too wide (goes outside the screen bounds).
I meant to write it fixes the effect in #234529.
I have to stop working...
Konstantinos
--
T
reassign 240410 anna
severity 240373 normal
merge 240373 240410
thanks
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:36:37AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:33:51AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:46:32PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > > When using the beta-3 netboot
Another thing,
please, what do I have to do to have the task overrides list
updated? I have setup a 'greek' task in tasksel that doesn't work
because tasksel doesn't find any available packages (#235433,
#238765). This is since Jan 28, 2 months ago. Whom do I have to beg
for this? (I have an
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:33:51AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:46:32PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > When using the beta-3 netboot mini-iso, debian-installer downloads and
> > unpacks both the sparc32 and sparc64 kernels. Since only one of the two
> > will be usable on
First, are there any other languages that use UTF-8 by default besides
Greek? Looking at
I noticed that UTF-8 produces some strange problems in the appearance
of some -not all- screens, esp. in the 2nd stage installation.
The programs that are affected are base-config:
http://people.debian.org
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > > - Is is ok to have bootloaders for i386 listed but not for others?
> > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > neither.
>
> Anyway, this boot load
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:46:32PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> When using the beta-3 netboot mini-iso, debian-installer downloads and
> unpacks both the sparc32 and sparc64 kernels. Since only one of the two
> will be usable on the system, this is a waste of both network useage and
> memory.
Yo
* Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-27 10:10]:
> >Copy to Baruch Even, the fribidi package maintainer
> I have done so ; its present in
> http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/fribidi for testing
>
> Will diff out the patch and forward to Baruch Evan
Baruch seems to be busy/inacti
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Thiemo Seufer]
> >> Yes, until recently debootstrap installed lilo.
> >
> > AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> > have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
>
> No, the changes wasn't done for all archs. But
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/
3/20/2004
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.23-backstreet-ruby #1 Fri Jan 2 16:08:29 CST 2004 i686
unknown
Date: 03/27/2004 8:15 CST
Method: From iso image from jigdo-lite burned to CD, s
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 07:01:26AM -0600, elijah wright wrote:
>
> > BTW, the SATA drive you mentioned previously are only used with the G5
> > powermac, right ? None of the earlier models have Serial ATA support ?
>
> right. SATA was new on the g5 towers. the g5 xServe machines are also
> now
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:29:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > - Powerpc (non-oldworld/etc).
> > > - New builds of the businesscard images on all supported arches, since
> > >the current beta3 ones are broken by exim changes.
> > > - Possibly some alpha netboot f
[Thiemo Seufer]
>> Yes, until recently debootstrap installed lilo.
>
> AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
No, the changes wasn't done for all archs. But I believe it _should_
be done for all ar
Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > - Powerpc (non-oldworld/etc).
> > > - New builds of the businesscard images on all supported arches, since
> > >the current beta3 ones are broken by exim changes.
> > > - Possibly some alpha netboot fixes, but I'm unsure of the status.
> > >
> BTW, the SATA drive you mentioned previously are only used with the G5
> powermac, right ? None of the earlier models have Serial ATA support ?
right. SATA was new on the g5 towers. the g5 xServe machines are also
now SATA - not that anyone i know personally has gotten their hands on
one, of
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:35:27PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:01:30PM -0700, toff wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:31:50PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > You had to mount the CD in order to eject it?
> >
> > Yes, if I don't mount it first I get a message
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> > have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
>
> As far as I can tell it was only for i386. alpha, ia64,
> m68k, powerpc, sparc, mipsel, hppa, all still have
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:24:12PM +0100, Pip Oomen wrote:
> Researching the 'missing driver' a bit further, it actually looks like
> the config option that is needed is:
>
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW=y
>
> This driver supports the Promise Ultra 100 TX2 [PDC20268], which seems
> to be the IDE
Quoting Eugeniy Meshcheryakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> I found that file tasks/po/debian-tasks.pot was outdated in tasksel
> repository. So I regenerated it. As result most po files have 2 fuzzy
> messages now. And:
>
Great. It seems that we missed thisThese strings are about the new
Hello.
I did an install with 03/25/2004 netinst sid iso. Everything but lvm
stuff went fine.
I have 2 blank vmware disks, 230 MB each, so I used partman to create
new partition tables.
I created one big root partition on the whole sda1, type ext2,
bootable
flag and "/" mountpoint.
Then I create
Researching the 'missing driver' a bit further, it actually looks like
the config option that is needed is:
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW=y
This driver supports the Promise Ultra 100 TX2 [PDC20268], which seems
to be the IDE device to which the harddisks are attached. So, what is
the status on t
Hi,
I found that file tasks/po/debian-tasks.pot was outdated in tasksel
repository. So I regenerated it. As result most po files have 2 fuzzy
messages now. And:
$ for i in [ps]l.po; do msgfmt --check --statistics -o /dev/null $i; done
msgfmt: pl.po: field `Project-Id-Version' still has initial
affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc/affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc/affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-pow
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.55_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.55.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.55.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-di_0.55_powerpc.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.4
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
I found debian-installer fails when I choose build_floppy_root on
kernel 2.6. Error message is 'depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented'.
I figured out what was problem.
Makefile is:
if [ -e $(TREE)/boot/System.map-$(VERSION) ]; then \
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 236777 discover1-data
Bug#236777: xserver-xfree86: Pre&post install script mistake (warning, not error, it
work)
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `discover1-data'.
> retitle 236777 discover1-data: bad data causes xserver-xfree
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:50:56AM +0100, Pip Oomen wrote:
> How about CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PROMISE ? Is that driver included in the
> kernel for the installer ?
This one is modular :
CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PROMISE=m
I can modify that for my next upload, since you would need them to be
builtin for now
>Shlomi Loubaton did some work on BIDI (BI-DIrectional langauges
>support) for Debian Installer.
>
>He hacked the slang libraries so that some handling of BIDI is added
>to it.
>
>This will probably need adding the libfribidi0 library to Debian
>Installer. Thus a libfribidi0-udeb package will proba
reassign 236777 discover1-data
retitle 236777 discover1-data: bad data causes xserver-xfree86 config script to chatter
thanks
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:39:07AM +0100, Sythos wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-5
> Severity: minor
>
> During upgrade from 4.0.3-3:
> Preparing to rep
Shlomi Loubaton did some work on BIDI (BI-DIrectional langauges
support) for Debian Installer.
He hacked the slang libraries so that some handling of BIDI is added
to it.
This will probably need adding the libfribidi0 library to Debian
Installer. Thus a libfribidi0-udeb package will probably need
How about CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PROMISE ? Is that driver included in the
kernel for the installer ?
[ ref:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2003/debian-powerpc-200309/msg00045.html
]
Regards,
Pepijn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
brltty-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.57_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-386/brltty-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.57_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.57_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-386/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.57_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_1.3.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.3.dsc
kernel-wedge_1.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.3.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_1.3_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.3_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contr
Accepted:
brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
cdrom-modu
linux-kernel-di-386_0.57_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-386_0.57.dsc
linux-kernel-di-386_0.57.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.57_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.57_i386.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.57_i386.ud
linux-kernel-di_0.56_source+i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing linux-kernel-di_0.56_source+i386.changes, but keeping its associated files
for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
kernel-wedge_1.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_1.3.dsc
kernel-wedge_1.3.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_1.3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
linux-kernel-di_0.56_source+alpha+m68k+s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.56.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.56_alpha.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-gen
Malte,
Errors like that are usually symptomatic of a dirty/dusty floppy drive.
Buy and use a floppy drive cleaning kit (a bottle of isopropanol
and a floppy-like thing with a non-abrasive fibrous disk in place
of the usual shiny oxide coated disk). Don't be afraid to use it
couple of times if yo
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 25.03.04 from Debian website (normal netinst)
Date: 26.03.04
System is the same as in #231083.
The install process worked without a hitch and left me with a bootbale
and working system. d-i has certainly come a long way since beta2!
Ho
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:55:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > More significant would be the aboot-base debootstrap fix, which would
> > seem to require the new debootstrap package in sarge. (3 days too young
> > right now per the usual testing waiting period.)
> debootstr
kernel-wedge_1.3_i386.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing kernel-wedge_1.3_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
67 matches
Mail list logo
