Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2004 02:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238341: fixed in kernel-patch-2.4-preempt 20031001-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Il Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:39:25AM +0100, Sven Luther ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:04:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
> Also, i had the impression that since a month or more, i was the only
> one really doing tests, so ...
I will test the new kernel and procedure on a powermac ti
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Debian-installer-version: beta 3 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Linux winter 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-03-17 15:00 GMT+8
Method: 100 MB C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 238360 pending
Bug#238360: discover: Updated Danish debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Quoting Claus Hindsgaul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: discover
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Please use the attached updated Danish debconf translation.
> The old one somehow doesnt seem to be active. Maybe this is because the po file
> header was not filled in correctly.
Commited.
[Christian Perrier]
> Have you noticed the unerased dialog below GRUB dialog ?
>
> This is related to a bug I already reported, but can't figure out
> which package I finally reported it against.
Not before you mention it now. No idea what that could be.
There is another dialog below the 'reboo
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We've been slashdotted. :-)
>
> More interesting is what they link to, people are doing usability
> reviews for us now, which is great: http://www.thiesen.org/d-i/index.html
>
> Thanks Marcus, we will take your suggestions into account.
Have you noticed
Quoting Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well... do we really target "Bob User"s?
I definitely do.
The eleven-keystroke installation process Joey already reported is a
result of this.
The 25-languages installation also.
I definitely want Debian to stop being the distribution chos
Me too.
I use netboot to install, but fail on dhcp.
Because tig3 kernel module not work correctly.
See this:
http://nox.lf.net/256bit.org/download/tp-R40e-install-howto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:49:20 -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> installation. I have a Linksys WPC11V3 card which should talk to a Linksys
> BEFW11S4. It was not able to pull an IP address from the router, but I've
> seen this happen before. I gave it a static IP address - which I actually
> p
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: <3/14/2004: http://people.debian.org/
~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/mac/nativehd-initrd.gz & nativehd-vmlinuz>
uname -a:
Date:
Method: How did you install?
Used the Nativehd-vmlinuz (see above. Installed using DHCP L
We have been Trusted by University and Industry
for the past 4 years.
Diplomas available in any field of your choice but are not limited to:
Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD)
call and receive your diploma within days.
1 212 629 1971
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 09:52, Joey Hess wrote:
> More interesting is what they link to, people are doing usability
> reviews for us now, which is great: http://www.thiesen.org/d-i/index.html
Well... do we really target "Bob User"s?
"The main problem that he had was that he had to think twice
Sylvain Roby wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 20040312 from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/
> My best nightmare complety bogus, in fact a process (grep -q ext3) stop
> at 14% the splash screen.
That is a known problem with the image you downloaded, it is fixed in
newer
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > > This means that when the packages
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 09:31:40AM +1100, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> BTW, is there a version of the installer with a kernel that supports
> SATA IDE drives? I'm setting up a default Debian install for the 60 or
> so desktop systems here, and the only problem I've discovered so far is
> the lack of
BTW, Start responding with some features you would like within
reasonable range with 2.6. I'll start the list here.
Features Requested:
lvm2
reiser4
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:36:31PM -0500, Dan Weber wrote:
> The installer and all the toolsets the installer depends on are in
Andy,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:00:59AM -0600, Andy Zbikowski (Zibby) wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20040315
> Tags: d-i, sarge
> When discover tryies to add the qlogicisp module to the installer kernel,
> lsmod reports that qlogicisp is initilazing, and the installer hangs
> awa
The installer and all the toolsets the installer depends on are in
just about perfect shape for 2.6. First mode of action is either
merging module-init-tools with busybox or, making a udeb of
module-init-tools. Since merging would be sufficiently much cleaner
thats my reccomended approach. I nee
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 06:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:19:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:26:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. Still, there is no chance that the pmac subarch suddenly works, if
> > > no one with pmac hardware does r
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 3 100Meg CD image
uname -a: Linux ryoko 2.4.15-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 17 March 2004 23:31
Method: The 100 mb cdrom, used our own internal proxy to speed up downloading package
lists and packages
Machi
We've been slashdotted. :-)
More interesting is what they link to, people are doing usability
reviews for us now, which is great: http://www.thiesen.org/d-i/index.html
Thanks Marcus, we will take your suggestions into account.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/kernel/linux-kernel-di
> In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv21344
>
> Modified Files:
> kernel-versions
> Log Message:
> * Jeff Bailey
> - Add HPPA support. Thanks to willy, lamont, tausq, and the other
> souls in
Package: cdebconf
Michael Wardle wrote:
> I just booted from the full Sarge Beta 3 netinst CD and found the keys
> doing something different than I expected. I wasn't sure where to
> report it, so I'm sending it to the list...
>
> In the configure network phase, the Ethernet card was successfull
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like to add support for the SiByte BCM91250A (MIPS) board to
> linux-kernel-di. The proposed patch looks ok to me and seems to work,
> but I thought I'd ask for comments before commiting.
Go ahead and commit it, if the kernel deb is not in the archive, comment
out th
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta3 for Sarge
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 17/03/04 02:10
Method: netinst cdrom
Machine: vmware on a packard bell easynote
Processor: athlon XP-M
Memory: 192Mo
Root Device: virtual
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:52:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > I quickly went to boot the beta3 CD to see which graphic was used, and
> > wasn't presented with one. I've only quickly inspected the CD, but I can see
> > a .rle file there, is there just an error in the isolinu
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Joey Hess]
> > If unstable has packages named discover2 and discover1, and testing
> > has only a package named discover, you will be unable to upate the
> > discover package in testing.
>
> Both testing and unstable will have a package named discover. In
> testing,
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I quickly went to boot the beta3 CD to see which graphic was used, and
> wasn't presented with one. I've only quickly inspected the CD, but I can see
> a .rle file there, is there just an error in the isolinux.cfg?
It's possible that syslinux may be unable to drive your vid
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 2. Documentation is broken -- build/README does not document
> that "make build_netboot" won't work. You need to type
> "fakeroot make build_netboot" instead.
I think this should be fairly obvious to figure out given that it calls
dh_testroot, but I've made it call it a li
Sven Luther wrote:
> No, i wont upload a new package until tomorrow, and that the current
> package goes into testing.
So I should expect a fixed package tomorrow then?
> Anyway, the current situation is installing
> the -apus kernel because base-installer doesn't seem to be able to fall
> back t
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:39:25 -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> The silo.conf on the beta 3 CD images does not have the boot options to
> turn on devfs and set root to the ramdisk devfs device.
[...]
> root=/dev/rd/0
[...]
> append="devfs=mount,dall rw"
Not sure why this doesn't already work.
Package: installation-reports
(This is a documentation bug.)
Just did a pretty-much stock i386 IDE installation using
sarge-i386-businesscard.iso, dated 15-Mar-2004 the version just before
beta-3.
The machine had an old installation of Redhat or something, and we
wanted to preserve /home/ftp. T
Package: installation-reports
Just did a pretty-much stock i386 IDE installation using
sarge-i386-businesscard.iso, dated 15-Mar-2004 the version just before
beta-3.
Everything went fine except, after installation and rebooting and
letting it install minimal packages (no tasks selected) it instal
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I worked some time ago with an Ultra 10, the Creator board was an
>> add-on, and when it was removed the base VGA port came back to
>> life. Does the Ultra 1 also have this? Have you tried witho
partman's debian/rules contains this:
# has buggy support for dvh partitioning labels, slow
ifeq ($(ARCH),mips)
MENUITEMNUM=49
This gives partman a lower priority on mips because it's not really
usable on SGI machines. However, I have a faster MIPS board which
doesn't use DVH but msd
VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 00:00
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom
Booting with "linux root=/dev/rd/0 devfs=mount,dall rw" works.
The silo.conf on the beta 3 CD images does not have the bo
Same deal. on beta 3:
It hangs on "Shipping unavailable module 'ide-floppy' for 'Linux IDE floppy'
Dead in the water. Hardware reset time. If someone can tell me how to
get some more debug info, I'm happy to look further into the issue myself.
Thanks,
john
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I've had three attempts at building d-i for hppa.
>
> 1. It won't build on a woody system (the packages it wants aren't available).
The common solution for this is to build in a unstable chroot.
Should work modulo stable kernel/unstable userland incompatibilities.
> 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 3/16/2004
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/
(netinst.iso)
uname -a:
Date: <3/16/2004 15:26>
Method: Booting from CD.
Machine: Dell Inspiron 4000
Processor: Pentiu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 23:20, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I quickly went to boot the beta3 CD to see which graphic was used, and
> wasn't presented with one. I've only quickly inspected the CD, but I can
> see a .rle file there, is there just an error in
I'd like to add support for the SiByte BCM91250A (MIPS) board to
linux-kernel-di. The proposed patch looks ok to me and seems to work,
but I thought I'd ask for comments before commiting.
Some notes:
- the kernel has ext3 and IDE built-in, so I guess the
Provides_mips_sb1-swarm-bn is okay.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Nusinow wrote:
Hi Nathan,
Could you please send the output of lspci -n, as well as the correct
XFree86 driver for your card in the version 4.3 Debian packages? Thank
you!
Sorry for sending you on a wild goose chase - I carefully recreated the
steps to build the
[Joey Hess]
> If unstable has packages named discover2 and discover1, and testing
> has only a package named discover, you will be unable to upate the
> discover package in testing.
Both testing and unstable will have a package named discover. In
testing, it will be version 1, and in unstable it
Hi Willy,
Basically needs more developer effort to get it working well on hppa.
Unfortunately I've been too busy lately and have dedicated the time I did
have to d-i for ia64. You need to build on unstable, and I iirc the
QM_MODULES thing was a glibc or kernel headers issue. I have built it
for
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps, but probably not. I think we should keep discover version 2
> out of testing until it is as good as discover 1. That mean the
> version of discover in sarge can be used with d-i, right?
If unstable has packages named discover2 and discover1, and testing has
Hi,
I quickly went to boot the beta3 CD to see which graphic was used, and
wasn't presented with one. I've only quickly inspected the CD, but I can see
a .rle file there, is there just an error in the isolinux.cfg?
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Mar 16, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not saying that there is no use for discover, but that hotplug is
> > more suitable to manage loading of kernel drivers (i.e. just about
> > everything which appears in /sys/).
> By looking at this, can we assume that it's uncontested that
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:09:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#237643: Installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
just reporting in with a success on some odd (but nice) hardware here...
- Dell Poweredge 2650 (dual 2.4ghz xeon)
- 4.5GB of ram
- onboard PERC (adaptec) RAID controller plus
additional adaptec u160 raid controller for external raid disks
- broadcom gigabit ethernet onboard
the one thi
I've had three attempts at building d-i for hppa.
1. It won't build on a woody system (the packages it wants aren't available).
2. Documentation is broken -- build/README does not document
that "make build_netboot" won't work. You need to type
"fakeroot make build_netboot" instead.
3. It won't
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:18:26PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I'm not saying that there is no use for discover, but that hotplug is
> more suitable to manage loading of kernel drivers (i.e. just about
> everything which appears in /sys/).
By looking at this, can we assume that it's uncontested
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:55:09AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> > [time outs on http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/ ]
>
> Well it works for me. Maybe it is an intermittent problem, a routing
> problem, or a problem with your dns? d-i.alioth.debian.org should
> resolve to 19
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:28:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > netinst CD images do not work for any powerpc subarch, because they
> > > don't have usable kernels on them. Also, the kernel images have a broken
> > > postinst that does not set up the /vmlinux symlink for yaboo
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:49:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 237643 -1
Bug#237643: Installation report
Bug 237643 cloned as bug 238388.
> reassign -1 partman
Bug#238388: Installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
> retitle -1 Allows to modify already mounted parti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 238301 -1
Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded
Bug 238301 cloned as bug 238390.
> reassign -1 setserial
Bug#238390: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded
Bug reassigned from package `de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 237618 The user can not use F1 in order to get additional help during the
> installation
Bug#237618: Debian-Installer beta 2
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
clone 238301 -1
reassign -1 setserial
thanks
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > This means that whe
discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
(new) discover1_1.5-4.dsc optional admin
(new) discover1_1.5-4.tar.gz optional admin
(new) discover1_1.5-4_i386.deb optional admin
hardware identification system
Discover is a hardware identification system base
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:14:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> > to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> > This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 237534 -1
Bug#237534: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues
Bug 237534 cloned as bug 238379.
> reassign -1 partman-lvm
Bug#238379: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-lv
Prezados senhores,
Estou abrindo papelaria e loja de presentes e
brinquedos e gostaria de trabalhar com seus produtos, principalmente os
cartuchos compatíveis.
Gostaria que me enviassem catálogo + lista de
preços, condições de pagamento, prazo de entrega, quantidades mínimas,
etc...
M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 237418 Problems with network install through modem without network card
Bug#237418: installation report new Debian installer beta2
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 237419 +fixed
Bug#237419: installation-reports
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
discover1_1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-4.dsc
discover1_1.5-4.tar.gz
discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-4_i386.deb
Greeting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 237291 +fixed
Bug#237291: d-i m68k mac nativehd success
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:46:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236973: Successful but troubled installation on mips (Indy R4k)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237185 grub-installer
Bug#237185: Rather good install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
> retitle 237185 Doesn't include the other operating systems in the boot menu
Bug#237185: Rather good install
Changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237075 bogl-bterm-udeb
Bug#237075: Debian installer segfaults on Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3d (sparc64)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `bogl-bterm-udeb'.
> retitle bterm exits with segmentation fault on Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3d
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-3_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-3_all.udeb
(new) discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3.dsc optional libs
(new) discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3.tar.gz optional libs
(new) discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3_all.deb optional libs
hardware lis
Rejected: discover1_1.5-4.dsc refers to discover1_1.5.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it
in the queue or in the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 236973 -1
Bug#236973: Successful but troubled installation on mips (Indy R4k)
Bug 236973 cloned as bug 238363.
> reassign -1 partman
Bug#238363: Successful but troubled installation on mips (Indy R4k)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-rep
On Mar 16, Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Which XFree86 driver works with my video card?
> - How do I format PostScript to talk to my printer?
> - What software do I need to install for my new scanner to work?
> - What package contains the special tweak utilities for my laptop?
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 238353 +fixed
Bug#238353: installation-reports
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3.tar.gz
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-3_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
discover1_1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-4.dsc
discover1_1.5-4.diff.gz
discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-4_i386.deb
Greetin
Package: discover
Severity: minor
Tags: patch l10n
Please use the attached updated Danish debconf translation.
The old one somehow doesnt seem to be active. Maybe this is because the po file
header was not filled in correctly.
# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of Discover1 Debian temp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 236914 -1
Bug#236914: Installation report (images from 7 March, i386)
Bug 236914 cloned as bug 238357.
> reassign -1 partman-auto
Bug#238357: Installation report (images from 7 March, i386)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `p
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:47:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Petter, this is not a problem but a feature. Actually I consider
discover broken by design because it needs a proprietary database which
must be updated for each driver added to the kernel and for each new
device supported by each driver.
I'm finding it a little difficult to res
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-di
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta-3, 16march2004
uname -a: Linux debpes 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 16march2004, 12:54PM EST
Method: Used 100MB CD, booted from standard IDE ATAPI CD-ROM
Machine: Compaq Deskpro EN 733
Processor: P
On Mar 16, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How difficult is this blacklisting to do? Is filing bugs against the
> hotplug package sufficient?
Yes, the name of the module has to be added to /etc/hotplug/blacklist.
Please provide a detailed explanation of why the blacklisting is needed
in
[Marco d'Itri]
> "Belonging, or pertaining, to a proprietor" (Webster)
> I meant something that is specific to a single program, feel free to
> choose a more suitable word.
Right. Here it is mostly used as another word for non-free, and I did
not see how the discover database was non-free.
> BTW
Quoting Eddy Petrisor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When is the deadline (release) for d-i?
This highly depends on sarge release deadlineswhich, afaik is not
yet exactly known
> Hopefuly, today the Romanian "team" will double it's
> size...
Great. As I already wrote elsewhere, think about asking fo
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> >The release cycle will probably be short, so please try to keep your
> >translations updated as quick as possible.
>
> How much short?
Well, no idea. But this now also depends on sarge release deadlines,
so you need to be pre
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Two modifications happened recently to d-i strings:
>
> -one new string in arcboot-installer
> -in fuzzy string in silo-installer
Indeed this was a complete rewrite of silo-installer templates. So,
you get 5 untranslated strings.
I've been puzzle
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
load-floppy_0.
On Mar 16, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually I consider discover broken by design because it needs a
> > proprietary database which must be updated for each driver added to
> > the kernel and for each new device supported by each driver.
> What do you mean by proprietary
affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-di_0.50_power
floppy-retriever_0.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
load-floppy_0.23_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:59:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > I've experienced some problems with hotplug earlier, as it is
> > > using the info in /lib/modules//modules.*map directly.
> > > If more than one module claim to support a given PCI id, it seem
> > > to pick any one of them. The
eochu wrote:
> There is no probleme with the network : all packages have been obtained.
> The problem comes when I try to partition the hard disk drive. The
> installer can not access to the hard disk.
We've just released beta 3 of the debian installer. Please try it and
see if it fixed your probl
Mark Brown wrote:
> During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
> to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
> This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
> configuration.
Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but
[Joey Hess]
> Hmm, this will make it harder to install unstable with d-i though.
Why?
'discover' in unstable will be discover version 2, and it work about
the same as discover version 1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Jeff Bailey]
> > > I'm curious, though. The new hotplug seems to have the goal of
> > > replacing discover. It may make sense to use that instead of
> > > discover2 on 2.6 based systems (since it's likely that everyone wi
linux-kernel-di_0.50_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+s390+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.50.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.50.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.50_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.50_i386.udeb
nic
we have an excellent reputation.
Any field of your choice is accepted. MBA, and Doctorate (PhD)
call and receive your diploma within days.
1 212 629 1971
[Marco d'Itri]
> Petter, this is not a problem but a feature.
Oh. I didn't realise. Thanks for clearing that up.
> Actually I consider discover broken by design because it needs a
> proprietary database which must be updated for each driver added to
> the kernel and for each new device supporte
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
