cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for yo

Processing of cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes

cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#152152: clamorous .

Top quality software stripped from it's Expensive. Extra's gives you the lowest Possible price - Guaran1eed! http://www.goodsoftwarenow.biz/lnow/?florican The 10 All-Time Best Software Products at Rock Bottom Prices! -s-t-o-p- http://goodsoftwarenow.biz/re/clean.php?bear

Bug#235364: marked as done (partman needs a progress bar at startup)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:11:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of partman 12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#235378: marked as done (automatic partitioning has undocumented partitiong scheme entry thing)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235378: fixed in partman-auto 6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#235374: marked as done (autopartitioning does not mark swap as swap)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235374: fixed in partman-auto 6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#235373: marked as done (strage /var/lib thing in the automatic partitioning menu)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235373: fixed in partman-auto 6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

partman-auto override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): partman-auto_6_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pack

partman-ext3 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pa

partman-auto_6_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-auto_6.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.dsc partman-auto_6.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.tar.gz partman-auto_6_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 235373 235374 235378

partman-ext3_10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-ext3_10.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10.dsc partman-ext3_10.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10.tar.gz partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contrib

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman 12

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 235364 + fixed Bug#235364: partman needs a progress bar at startup Tags were: pending d-i Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processing of partman-ext3_10_i386.changes

partman-ext3_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-ext3_10.dsc partman-ext3_10.tar.gz partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processing of partman-auto_6_i386.changes

partman-auto_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_6.dsc partman-auto_6.tar.gz partman-auto_6_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

partman_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman_12.dsc to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12.dsc partman_12.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12.tar.gz partman_12_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 235364 Thank you for your contribution

Fixed in NMU of partman 12

tag 235364 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:21:33 -0500 Source: partman Binary: partman Architecture: source i386 Version:

Processing of partman_12_i386.changes

partman_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman_12.dsc partman_12.tar.gz partman_12_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Processing of debian-installer_20040302_i386.changes

debian-installer_20040302_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20040302.dsc debian-installer_20040302.tar.gz debian-installer-demo_20040302_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20040302_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes is NEW

affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.22-ita

Processing of linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes

linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di_0.41.dsc linux-kernel-di_0.41.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb nic-extr

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: > The last upload of the debian-installer package failed to build on > powerpc and mips. > > powerpc: > > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=powerpc&stamp=1078039810&file=log&as=raw > > The following packages have unmet dependencie

Re: debian-installer fails for SiS 648, 648fx, 746 mainboard chipsets

Mike Taylor wrote: > debian-installer fails for my new laptop. I think I have run in to the > problem described and patched by Oliver Heilmann on the linux-kernel list. > Apparently, the AGP port requires some initialization not provided by > current kernels. The machine locks up when the kernel

Bug#235717: Installation report (i386 - Beta 2)

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT I have been a Debian user since about 5 years. I currently have a home network consisting of 3 i386 boxes (2 servers, 1 desktop) and used the desktop for the installation test. Because I got confused the first few times and was not satisfied with the r

debian-installer fails for SiS 648, 648fx, 746 mainboard chipsets

debian-installer fails for my new laptop. I think I have run in to the problem described and patched by Oliver Heilmann on the linux-kernel list. Apparently, the AGP port requires some initialization not provided by current kernels. The machine locks up when the kernel tries to load the agpgart

Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:51:04PM +0100, Gabor Nagy wrote: > Package: discover > Version: 1.5-2 > Severity: wishlist > > I have a laptop. My configuration never changes. Discover runs on every > boot, and I boot many times a day. Each discover run takes like 30s > time. Do you have any clue why

Bug#235691: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Mars 1st 2004, http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040301/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso uname -a: Linux goblin 2.4.24-1-386 #1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Mars 1st 2004, 2100-2400 GMT+1 Method: CDRom

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > AFAICT this is anonymous svn access, OTOH I can reach > svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk Yeah, now again only anonymous access fails but with: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> svn co svn://alioth.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk tasksel svn: No reposi

Message from the AntiVirus Gateway for Energizer Mail Systems

The email message you sent included a file attachment. The file story.com matches one of the file types prohibited by Energizer virus protection policy. It was removed from the message. Please contact Energizer for instructions regarding alternative methods of file transmission. -- To UNSUB

Re: Base system installation error

On Mar 1, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Johannes Behr wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote: On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: Hi, When did you do that? Just t

Re: Base system installation error

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote: > On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > > > >> When did you do that? > > > > Just today

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Falk Hueffner wrote: > > This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for > > users who might go with whatever the default is: > > > > / Whole harddisk > > swapnone, but 512M swap file (independent of memory) > > I also wouldn't

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

Falk Hueffner wrote: > This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for > users who might go with whatever the default is: > > / Whole harddisk > swapnone, but 512M swap file (independent of memory) I also wouldn't mind having this scheme available, although I think the

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:52:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > I now have m68k daily builds at > > . They are now > > being built right off the archiv

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The partitioning schemes of partman-auto currently are only > examples. So if you have some idea for usefull partitioning just > tell it. I have to know what partitions your scheme has and an > example size of each partition as well as the minimal and

debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb debian-installer_20040301.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040301.dsc debian-installer_20040301.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-instal

Re: release status

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > A few things that porters need to do soon, if you have a port that > > mostly works. Consider these mandatory for release: > > > > - Get daily builds working. > > Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64,

Re: [l10n] Update l10n-changes

Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > * The biggest change for now: if log-changes is run after (or within) > every debconf-updatepo run, the final changelog will include all the > translators who have been working on it since the last release! Here > you go, Christian. Sounds fine.

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:37:57PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > No, svn+ssh does work but not anonymous. > > svn+ssh does not work either: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/d-i/HEAD$ svn co > svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk tasksel >

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

Anton Zinoviev wrote: > Hi! > > The partitioning schemes of partman-auto currently are only examples. > So if you have some idea for usefull partitioning just tell it. I > have to know what partitions your scheme has and an example size of > each partition as well as the minimal and the maximal u

Processing of debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes

debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20040301.dsc debian-installer_20040301.tar.gz debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20040301_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: release status

The last upload of the debian-installer package failed to build on powerpc and mips. powerpc: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=powerpc&stamp=1078039810&file=log&as=raw The following packages have unmet dependencies: di-utils-shell: Depends: lib

[Virus detected]

Sophos Plc MailMonitor for Domino/D R1.0(4.003c) Server: PVLDCX04 --- Your email contained infected attachment(s). For advice consult your system administrator. ---

Re: mkisofs for build_netboot

Geert Stappers wrote: > mkisofs -r -J -b isolinux.bin -c boot.cat \ > -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \ > -o ./tmp/netboot/mini.iso ./tmp/netboot/cd_tree > make[2]: mkisofs: Command not found > > > Installing mkisofs fixed it. > > For what does the netboot need t

Receive yo.ur Vlagra orde.r in 24 to 48 h.ours RaXZ

Now You Can Or`der Val^ium - X|anax - Vi"agra - Ci)alis Onl{ine. 8O+% Savi(ngs Orde~ring On!lineNo Prescr`iption RequiredDoc'tor&FDA Appr~ovedFedEx Over`night Shi^pping Visit Our Site and Order Here (Spec!ial Grand Openi,ng Pri(ces End Soonord{er your med[s today and have them at your doorst

Re: Base system installation error

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > When did you do that? > > Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.de

Re: Base system installation error

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:37, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > When did you do th

Re: Base system installation error

On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: Hi, When did you do that? Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org and ftp.tiscalie.de) I did read here th

Re: Base system installation error

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > When did you do that? Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org and ftp.tiscalie.de) > > I did read here there where wrong tarred file

Bug#230435: AIC79xx not working. Solved!

Doh! I forgot to disable Hostraid on the controller. Don't need raid. We only have one drive. Now it works. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235617: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netins t.iso uname -a: Linux debby 2.4.24-1-386 # 1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 unknown Date: 01.03.2004 12:00 Method: Network install, direct connect Machine: Fujit

Re: release status

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > A few things that porters need to do soon, if you have a port that > mostly works. Consider these mandatory for release: > > - Get daily builds working. > Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc I now have m68k daily b

Re: Base system installation error

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote: > > Hi, > > i tried to install sarge/testing on my dell INSPIRON-8000 > notebook using 'net' install. > > After assigning the partitions/mirror the install-process > starts to fetch packages and every think just looks fine > until i

[l10n] Update l10n-changes

Hello, it's me again! Well, you guessed it: I've updated my script (or now better: scripts) once again. The new features of this release: * The script has been renamed to something more appropriate * It has been split in two parts, one suitable for running after each debconf-updatepo run (Denis,

Re: available for french translation

[Noel Nachtegael] > hi, > > my name is Noël I am from Belgium > I am available for french translations for the installer Sounds good. See http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/> and http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/debian-installer/doc/translations.txt?rev=1.22&content-typ

Base system installation error

Hi, i tried to install sarge/testing on my dell INSPIRON-8000 notebook using 'net' install. After assigning the partitions/mirror the install-process starts to fetch packages and every think just looks fine until it stops and a red text-error-box appears: --

Bug#235221: marked as done (debootstrap error (return value 1), tar: Unrecognised file type)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:49:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: busybox is not used in d-i has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Re: Processed: busybox is not used in d-i

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 235221 busybox-cvs Bug#235221: debootstrap error (return value 1), tar: Unrecognised file type Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `busybox-cvs'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > No, svn+ssh does work but not anonymous. svn+ssh does not work either: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/d-i/HEAD$ svn co svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk tasksel svn: No repository found in 'svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk' svn: Berkeley DB

Bug#235107: In fact you can

> And even more, once discover2 will replace discover1, it will > work flawless with 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, and you can't do that with > /etc/modules If fact you can, by using aliases instead of modules names in /etc/modules. These aliases may be defined differently in /etc/modutils/ for 2.4 and /e

building a debian install CD with a custom kernel

Hello, is there any howto on building an install CD with a custom kernel to support special hardware not supported by standard debian kernels? Ciao, m. -- Matthias Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration

Package: discover Version: 1.5-2 Severity: wishlist I have a laptop. My configuration never changes. Discover runs on every boot, and I boot many times a day. Each discover run takes like 30s time. It was very good to have discover when I installed the system. But now it is annoying me. I would

Bug#235578: discover: fails to load several modules on 2.6, because of different names

Package: discover Version: 1.5-2 Severity: important Discover detects my hardware, and tries to load modules. It seems to me it is using 2.4 module names, thus it fails. Some typescripts: Detecting hardware: agpgart i810_rng i810-tco i82092 i82092 e100 ide-scsi i810_audio usb-ohci usb-ohci Skippi

Re: mkisofs for build_netboot

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:07:14 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > For what does the netboot need the mini.iso ? On i386, build_netboot will spit out an initrd.gz, vmlinuz, and a related ISO image. On sparc it will always generate a.out tftp boot images. Such is how the cookie crumbles :) -- Joshua Kwa

Re: partman review

On 29.II.2004 at 17:09 Joey Hess wrote: > > Looking at the automatic partitoning menu, I get the feeling this menu > was designed to be used this way.. was it? Yes, it was. > As to implementation, I think partman-auto could simply povide an init.d > script which runs last and displays the menu i