Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 216435 pending fixed-upstream
Bug#216435: busybox-cvs: ln reports wrong error
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: pending, fixed-upstream
> tags 215612 pending fixed-upstream
Bug#215612: modprobe should be silent on request
Tags were: fixed-upst
msmtymr nizzbasge eemfgerhr lwwxaocji ryikpcpr.
xpasmqilil aiaufr gzvjzwgoyp avoqok mnmbykkmlo. olnlgbbylv gnulsgoi gtzuipk.
Mlcrosoft Windows XP Professional 2002 - $39.95
Retail: $260.95
Our low: $39.95 More: http://www.softforlive.biz
You S.ave: $236
Mlcosoft Office XP Professional 2002 - 59.
hi folks
i merged a current cvs snapshot of busybox and intend to release them
before beta2 because it includes many fixes. the changelog entry is
busybox-cvs (20040101-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New CVS version.
- Fix ln. (closes: #216435)
- Make insmod quiet. (closes: #215612)
*
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> sarge-i386-businesscard.iso 30-Dec-2003 11:01 36.7M
Are you sure this was a businesscard iso?
> Another problem, when I was configuring the system, I choosed to run
> aptitude but in aptitude's main menu the only 2 available voices were:
> --- Obsolete and Locally Created
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 11:23:31AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Appendix A: The debootstrap --debian-installer progress stream.
> The stream consists of a number of lines. Each line is of the form:
> CODE: arg1 [arg2 .. argn]
Format is:
x:
xA:
xF:
where x is E, W or I for
Im pretty sure this got fixed ages ago, there is no currently no problem
with the serial console on arm.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug has been fixed in upstreams cvs.
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A fix for this bug has been applied to upstreams cvs.
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hooked up a serial console so I could capture the messages as I
tried to boot from my handbuilt boot cd. (d-i cvs as of a couple of
days ago.) The interesting part of it is below. If I am interpreting
it correctly, it mounts the initrd as root, then tries to mount root
via nfs which fails, trie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 173390 fixed-upstream
Bug#173390: busybox-cvs: broken terminal width (TIOCGWINSZ)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> close 173390
Bug#173390: busybox-cvs: broken terminal width (TIOCGWINSZ)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.de
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Richard Hirst wrote:
> > Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
> > debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
> > tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantim
Your message dated Wed, 31 Dec 2003 21:32:47 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sorry
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Sorry, typo. Instead of:
-- begin --
This problem goes away after updating to:
mtools/stable uptodate 3.9.8-7
-- end --
should read:
mtools/unstable uptodate 3.9.9-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> You know that this is just a workaround, cause there is
> still no aic7xxx on the boot floppy.
You are mistaken (as of ~Dec 20th); moreover the aic7xxx module is not
needed for USB CD ROM drives.
> >I think we should use ext2 disk labels.. :-P
> >
>
> BTW, I noticed that t
Richard Hirst wrote:
> Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
> debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
> tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantime.
d-i is supposed to use debootstrap-udeb, which as a udeb is not
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
The problem is that the d-i bootdisk contains an USB driver,
which seems to be always loaded as soon as you've got any
mass storage attached to USB. Later (in the running system)
the USB stuff is loaded when running hotplug, i.e. its one
of the last steps at b
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_sparc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Done
directory.
Rejected: no source found for netcfg 0.39 (netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb).
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb: old version (0.39) in unstable >= new version (0.39)
targeted at unstable.
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_
netcfg_0.39_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.39_sparc.udeb
netcfg-static_0.39_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Package: busybox-cvs-udeb
Version: 20031212-2
Severity: normal
Current udeb package doesn't provide the sleep link so netcfg cannot
use it.
Is really fine if you fix it before beta2 of d-i is out.
TIA
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux revie
This is using the daily build sarge-ia64-buisnesscard.iso, dated
30-DEC-2003 11:02.
Installing sarge didn't work, because it doesn't have the newest
debootstrap, so I used it to install sid. This is the first time I've
tried d-i for a few weeks, and some things have broken in the meantime.
Issue
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> The problem is that the d-i bootdisk contains an USB driver,
> which seems to be always loaded as soon as you've got any
> mass storage attached to USB. Later (in the running system)
> the USB stuff is loaded when running hotplug, i.e. its one
> of the last steps at boot time
Me:
> for after beta 2. If nobody does, I will probably work on it after the
> beta is out.
Famous last words. I think I'm about 50% of the way there currently. Of
course it changes far too many strings to go into beta 2.
I have also changed run-debootstrap to log the debootstrap stderr and
stdou
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily built from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
sarge-i386-businesscard.iso 30-Dec-2003 11:01 36.7M
uname -a: Linux barney 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586
GNU/Lin
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Probably the installer loaded usb-storage before the module for your
SCSI controller and the module loading order on the installed system was
the other way around. We had the same problem with switched NIC's.
It's probably quite tricky to solve this.
The problem is that th
Package: boot-floppies
Severity: serious
Apparently the version in 'sid' is the version used for the release of
'woody'. This needs to be put in woody. Some DD with an understanding
of the dependencies should submit it to woody-proposed-updates.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S.V.P RESPONDS MOI A MON ADRESSE EMAIL PRIVEE;
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Cher,
Avec le respect et l´humilité que je vous dois, Je
vous écris cette lettre pour que vous nous aidiez, Mes
enfants et moi.
Je suis Mme Mariam Koneh L´épouse du défunt Dr. David E
Koneh .Avant l´assassinat de mon mari par le
* Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 19:20]:
| On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 05:15:28PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| > * Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 09:56]:
| > | Just tested the latest image from
| > | http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
| > |
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_sparc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Done
directory.
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb: old version (0.39) in unstable >= new version (0.39)
targeted at unstable.
Rejected: netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the
archive.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 05:15:28PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
> * Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 09:56]:
> | Just tested the latest image from
> | http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
> | sarge-i386-netinst.iso 30-Dec-2003 11:01 107M
> |
> | [EMAIL
netcfg_0.39_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.39.dsc
netcfg_0.39.tar.gz
netcfg_0.39_sparc.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.39_sparc.udeb
netcfg-static_0.39_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: boot-floppies
Severity: serious
Duh.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
mklibs_0.1.13.dsc
to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.13.dsc
mklibs_0.1.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.13.tar.gz
mklibs_0.1.13_all.deb
to pool/main/m/mklibs/mklibs_0.1.13_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCR
mklibs_0.1.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mklibs_0.1.13.dsc
mklibs_0.1.13.tar.gz
mklibs_0.1.13_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Accepted:
main-menu_0.054.dsc
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.054.dsc
main-menu_0.054.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.054.tar.gz
main-menu_0.054_i386.udeb
to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.054_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Harald Dunkel um 13:53:
> Hi folks,
>
> Using the Sarge netinst CD of yesterday I tried to install
> Debian on a SCSI disk.
>
> d-i gave me an unusual sequence of SCSI drives to select
> the boot disk from. Here is the list of disks as presented
> by d-i:
>
> /dev/
Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 01:30:
> Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
> > > Some ugly things during boot:
> > >
> > > - discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module
> > > failed to load with "No such device".
main-menu_0.054_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_0.054.dsc
main-menu_0.054.tar.gz
main-menu_0.054_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
I guess we can all agree that base-installer's endless series of
progress bars could use improvement..
I don't have time to work on this right now, but I know one way to more
or less fix them. I applied the same technique to hw-detect to change it
from using two progress bars to just one; it was t
* Philipp Kolmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-31 09:56]:
| Hi!
|
| Just tested the latest image from
| http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
| sarge-i386-netinst.iso 30-Dec-2003 11:01 107M
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
| 8d88a368fc22eee
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.53_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.53_i386.udeb
cdebconf-s
Accepted:
base-installer_0.045.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.045.dsc
base-installer_0.045.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.045.tar.gz
base-installer_0.045_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.045_i386.udeb
kernel-installer_0.045_a
cdebconf_0.53_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.53.dsc
cdebconf_0.53.tar.gz
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.53_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.53_i386.deb
cdebconf_0.53_i386.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.53_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.53_i386.udeb
libdebc
base-installer_0.045_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_0.045.dsc
base-installer_0.045.tar.gz
kernel-installer_0.045_all.udeb
base-installer_0.045_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
(there was no report template in /root/ so I've modified one from the BTS)
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: businesscard iso 20031230
uname -a: Linux debian. 2.4.23-1-386 #1 Sun Nov 30 16:49:14 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 2003-dec-30
Met
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:24:07 -1000, June Hiraki wrote:
> I have a home page, and you had better take your home page off my
> computer before I call the Better Business Bureau! Who the hell do
> you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my
> computer without even asking me first?
Blars Blarson wrote:
> The sparc netcfg udebs need to get into the debian archives. (The
> sparc autobuilder is either not running or still trying to catch up.
> I'd rate python a higher priority.) Should I sign and upload the
> package I built?
Yes, certianly.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
De
June Hiraki wrote:
> I have a home page, and you had better take your home page off my
> computer before I call the Better Business Bureau! Who the hell do
> you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my
> computer without even asking me first?
We seem to have lost all our copies
Hi folks,
Using the Sarge netinst CD of yesterday I tried to install
Debian on a SCSI disk.
d-i gave me an unusual sequence of SCSI drives to select
the boot disk from. Here is the list of disks as presented
by d-i:
/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/disc (USB disc)
/dev/scsi/host3/bus0/ta
Accepted:
anna_0.048.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.048.dsc
anna_0.048.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.048.tar.gz
anna_0.048_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.048_i386.udeb
load-installer_0.048_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/load-installer_0.048_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anna_0.048_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
anna_0.048.dsc
anna_0.048.tar.gz
load-installer_0.048_all.udeb
anna_0.048_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, June Hiraki wrote:
> I have a home page, and you had better take your home page off my
> computer before I call the Better Business Bureau! Who the hell do
> you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my
> computer without even asking me first?
>
> You'd bett
Package: installation-reports
Version: bootfloppy img 2003226, hd-media-image
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily,
v 20031226
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686
unknown
Date: Wed Dec 31 02
Il mer, 2003-12-31 alle 10:40, Sven Luther ha scritto:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, as a result i cannot commit the small fix i promised you
> yesterday, so someone else will have to do it. Here it is :
[... KERNEL_FLAVOUR patch ...]
Hi Sven,
yester
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:21:16AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> powerpc: Very shakey
> - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
> and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
> debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc
>
Hi!
Just tested the latest image from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
sarge-i386-netinst.iso 30-Dec-2003 11:01 107M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test$ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684 sarge-i386-netinst.iso
and I wanted to have a software
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:35:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> So why does rootskel need /var/run? Just curious..
>
> > + * Matt Kraai
> > +- Create /var/run.
dhclient wants to put a pidfile there.
Since it's an FHS standard, I thought it made more sense in
rootskel than in each package that
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:31:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225583: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-30):
libacl1 error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
57 matches
Mail list logo
