Re: building d-i for sparc

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >d. Work with me to get sparc turned on in its architecture list, >> > so sparc images can enter the archive. >>=20 >> I think silo-installer is needed before we start bothering with any >> automatic building. > >Well yeah, it's kind of

Bug#218870: marked as done (needs to install kernel-pcmcia-modules-xxx for i386)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:57:38 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#224644: marked as done (lost hostname entry, "localhost")

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#224644: fixed in netcfg 0.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#221984: marked as done (dlink 660 pcmcia card not recognised on CD install; pcmcia-cs-udeb not loaded)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line d-i pcmcia issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Re: XFS support in d-i

On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:12:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > As I do appear to be making some progress on getting an XFS-enabled d-i > image together, I thought I would give everyone a status update. The > 2.4.22-based kernel-image packages are now sitting in the NEW queue; > although no rea

Bug#221716: marked as done (pcmcia-udeb not loaded during CD install; pcmcia does work after install either)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line d-i pcmcia issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#222775: marked as done (pcmcia-udeb not loaded during CD install; pcmcia does work after install either)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line d-i pcmcia issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

home page

I have a home page, and you had better take your home page off my computer before I call the Better Business Bureau!  Who the hell do you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my computer without even asking me first?   You'd better send me an e-mail how to get rid of you A

net.gz on cd image has netcfg-static and netcfg-dhcp?

It seems that the net.gz image on the netinst cd is some old and broken thing that includes netcfg-static and netcfg-dhcp instead of the new combined netcfg. If I build my own netboot initrd, I get one with the new netcfg in it. I downloaded netboot-initrd.gz from sjogren's daily builds, and it too

Re: Install report (not successfull, 2nd image of 20031230, i386)

Erich Waelde wrote: > Debian-installer-version: > 30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from > http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ > > just to be sure: > md5sum sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso > 8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684 sarg

Bug#222631: marked as done (/etc/mailname is "(none)")

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#222631: fixed in netcfg 0.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#206531: marked as done (Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#206531: Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

pcmcia RequestIRQ problem (was Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain)

Package: debian-installer Tags: d-i I wrote: > klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use > Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found > anything that has helped. Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > FWIW I've seen this too. I never solved it, but AFAIK somebody I knew

debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb debian-installer_20031230.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20031230.dsc debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-instal

Processed: merge wifi bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 214491 netcfg Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `netcfg'. > severity 214491 wishlist Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb Severity set to `wishlist'. > merge 214491 225512 Bug#214491: n

netcfg_0.40_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: netcfg-dhcp_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg_0.40.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.40.dsc netcfg_0.40.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.40.tar.gz netcfg_0.4

Processing of netcfg_0.40_i386.changes

netcfg_0.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_0.40.dsc netcfg_0.40.tar.gz netcfg_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg-dhcp_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.40_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#225389: marked as done (sparc: circular dependacy in netboot image)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:41:57 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in cvs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#225057: marked as done (Updated Swedish debconf translation)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:17:33 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225057: fixed in base-config 2.04 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Joey Hess wrote: > I don't feel this is the right fix. /etc/hostname does not have the same > format as /etc/hosts either! Instead, why not just make netcfg > echo the hostname to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname. I belive that exim4's > postinst will do the right thing if the hostname is actually set. We

Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169

So why does rootskel need /var/run? Just curious.. > + * Matt Kraai > +- Create /var/run. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:00:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Total time to install Debian: 5 minutes 15 seconds Wow. :-) > klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use > Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found > anything that has helped. FWIW I've seen this too

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00: > > Some ugly things during boot: > > > > - discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module > > failed to load with "No such device". > According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module:

Bug#225545: marked as done (mtab creation hack does not work)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:49:02 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: ports status update

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:29:58PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > alpha: ??? > Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look > like anyone's worked on it since October? Where d-i work is concerned, alpha is my next priority. My first priority is getting a set of working

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 01:06: > Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > I don't know where the dot comes from neither... > > I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all... > > > > The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname > > issue (prebaseconfig cop

Bug#212143: netcfg mailname

/etc/mailname does not have the same format as /etc/hostname, so this change to netcfg royally stuffed it. Please test changes before committing! I think that all netcfg has to do is actually set the hostname. It could do this by echoing the hostname to a file in /proc, for example. exim4's ostins

Processing of debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes

debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20031230.dsc debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20031230_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: building d-i for sparc

Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for > > all relevant image types. > > cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point > floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's no

Re: ports status update

Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me): > > i386: On track for beta 2 > > powerpc: Very shakey > > ia64: Likely to be in beta 2 > > mips: May be in beta 2 > > arm: Uncertian > The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have > d-i kernels yet.

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:23:44PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00: > > What on earth? Taking a look at /etc/mailname, I see: > > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > 192.168.1.1 debian. debian > > > > Something is _very_ broken here. FWIW, my /etc/host

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I don't know where the dot comes from neither... > I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all... > > The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname > issue (prebaseconfig copied /etc/hosts to /target/etc/mailname). > The patch I attached

Bug#225360: marked as done (udeb still has no freeramdisk)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:17:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225360: fixed in busybox-cvs 20031212-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#225584: make cd_image requires updated mtools

Package: debian-installer Tags: d-i Severity: minor In the CVS head as d-i as of 2003-12-30, a 'make cd_image' on my machine fails with: mkfs.msdos 2.10 (22 Sep 2003) # mkfs.msdos gets the mode wrong (bug filed) chmod 644 dest/cdrom-image.img.new mcopy -idest/cdrom-image.img.new ./tmp/cdrom/vmlin

Bug#225583: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-30): libacl1 error

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-12-30 (11:01) Severity: normal Tags: d-i (Same config as in #220014). Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard

yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc

Install report (not successfull, 2nd image of 20031230, i386)

Hello all, I just pressed "send" and "reload" and there was a new netinst-image! Well, then just try this also. Debian-installer-version: 30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ just to be sure:

Re: building d-i for sparc

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for > all relevant image types. cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not something I'm concerned about.

Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration

Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 17:28: > * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-30 10:54]: > > Package: netcfg > > Tags: d-i > > > > I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg. > > As I said before, this has been filed as #214491. sorry about that. I only chec

Re: pending translation uploads

Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 22:39, Joey Hess ha scritto: > These packages have many translation updates, and have not been > uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures. > Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully > translated beta 2 on their architectures: [

Processing of yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes

yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: ports status update

Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me): i386: On track for beta 2 powerpc: Very shakey ia64: Likely to be in beta 2 mips: May be in beta 2 arm: Uncertian The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with

busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_2003

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00: > Some ugly things during boot: > > - discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module > failed to load with "No such device". According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module: 80862418bridge i810_rng

Processing of busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes

busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Deb

aptitude defaults for d-i

[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:44:19 -0500] >> But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. >> Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some >> pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver >> recommends "wordlist", which apt

Processed: Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 225545 + fixed Bug#225545: mtab creation hack does not work Tags were: d-i Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: ARM library reduction issue

On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 21:09, Joey Hess wrote: > Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W > ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so > With output: readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file > ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. I put an updated mklibs in http://people.debian.org/~pb/ and th

Re: aptitude, was: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Hello Harri, aptitude > options > dependency handling: unselect: "install suggested packages automatically" and unselect: "install recommended packages automatically" First thing I do :-) and the world looks nicer for me. Erich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: status of translation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-12-30 20:14, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Hello. > > May I ask what's wrong with status webpage? > http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/ > It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file. > I've checked this

Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47

tag 225545 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:51:25 -0500 Source: prebaseconfig Binary: prebaseconfig Architecture: source a

bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb Announcing to

prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting b

Re: Installation Report (success)

Thank you for the detailed report. Erich Waelde wrote: > The bad news: > > Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with "net" boot method > still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles. > > The good news: > > Using "expert", i.e. installing from CD rather than from apt > reposit

Processing of prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes

prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Processing of bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes

bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

base-config_2.04_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-config_2.04.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.dsc base-config_2.04.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.tar.gz base-config_2.04_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 225057 Thank

ARM/i386 library reduction issue

[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:09:28 -0500] Vince> Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W Vince> ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so With output: readelf: Vince> Error: Cannot stat input file Vince> ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. Joey> Command failed with status

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

Harald Dunkel wrote: > I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked. > > But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. > Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some > pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver > recommends "

pending translation uploads

These packages have many translation updates, and have not been uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures. Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully translated beta 2 on their architectures: yaboot-installer aboot-installer palo

Re: discover 2 test packages

Am Mit, den 24.12.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 13:46: > Hi > > I fixed discover2 support in hw-detect yesterday (already in the archive > thanks to joeyh) and now I uploaded discover2 packages for testing to my > website: > http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/ > > I renamed the p

Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain

I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked. But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver recommends "wordlist", which aptitude resolve

Processing of base-config_2.04_i386.changes

base-config_2.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.04.dsc base-config_2.04.tar.gz base-config_2.04_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Installation Report (success)

Hello all, I did a simple installation (2 partitions / + /boot, no LVM, no raid) on my crash box. This is what I found. The bad news: Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with "net" boot method still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles. The good news: Using "expert", i.e.

Re: ARM library reduction issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Moving libdiscover.so.1.0.0 to libdiscover.so.1. > Moving libc.so.6 to libc.so.6. > Moving libdebconfclient.so.0 to libdebconfclient.so.0. > Moving libdl.so.2 to libdl.so.2. > Moving libdebian-installer.so.4 to libdebian-installer.so.4. > Moving libm.so.6 to libm.so.6. >

generally successful install report from usb keychain

Debian-installer-version: today's (second build) netinst CD from manty's home dir Method: booting from a 128 mb usb keychain with hd-media initrd I built, and the d-i ISO on it Machine: LC2000 laptop from LinuxCertified, Inc. Processor: 2.66 Ghz P4 Memory: 516 mb Root Device: 36 gb IDE Ba

status of translation

Hello. May I ask what's wrong with status webpage? http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/ It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file. I've checked this file and it seems that it's correctly translated and up-to-date. So what's wrong? regards fEnIo -- _

Re: No Network Setup

Deron Wilkerson wrote: > Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there > was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the > install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to > enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter

No Network Setup

Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter the info from the command lin

Bug#225545: mtab creation hack does not work

Package: prebaseconfig Severity: normal Tags: d-i I just tried a CD install current to today, and /target/etc/mtab did not get created. It seems that the mtab hack I put in prebaseconfig does not work. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dragon

Re: test report

stefan wrote: > trying the swiss german installation: > - not all translations well done, screens are mixed german/ english German should be at 100% now, with only possibly a very few things (like cfdisk) not translated. I think you did an install right before most of that got in. > - was try

Re: how to connect to the net?

Harald Dunkel wrote: > I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But > after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config > did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection. > > I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config,

Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash

Joey Hess wrote: > Barry Hawkins wrote: > > Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I > > almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my > > curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit > > the effort to file an instal

Re: cdrom install report in vmware (net problems, otherwise OK!)

Joey Hess wrote: > It did not configure the network. netcfg is on the cd, but udeb_include is > broken. I am working right now on fixing that (I broke it :-( ) Missing udeb_include on the cd. Manty has fixed this and updated the images. > Base-config 2.0 is on there, but it somehow got the debcon

Re: ports status update

Thorsten Sauter wrote: > of course, I can do this. I will try the demo this weekend. And I know, > that the installer itself works good on my hppa machine. If you wait until this weekend, there's a good chance it will miss beta 2. FWIW. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signatur

how to connect to the net?

Hi folks, I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection. I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config, or of d-i. Regards

Re: dec29th netinst broken

Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: The new netinst iso of today gave me Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours. Still the same problem. Well I was ove

Bug#225333: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-28): deboostrap error ...

Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Error were encountered while procession : > base-config > /usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep not found This problem is fixed in the latest CD images, built about half an hour ago, and available in the usual place. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signat

cdrom install report in vmware (net problems, otherwise OK!)

Debian-installer-version: manty netinst CD, built today Method: cd install in vmware Machine: vmware Memory: 90 mb Root Device: 300 mb virtual scsi Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [E] Detect CD: [O]

Re: dec29th netinst broken

Harald Dunkel wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > >Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > >>The new netinst iso of today gave me > >> > >>Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting > > > > > >This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours. > > > Still the same problem. W

Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration

* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-30 10:54]: > Package: netcfg > Tags: d-i > > I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg. As I said before, this has been filed as #214491. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: ports status update

* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-29 20:36]: | Thorsten Sauter wrote: | > there is currently no daily build. I have started it, but now pear.d.o | > is not recovered/opened for me. So that's the same like powerpc... | > waiting. | > | > I have created a cdrom-set, so I thing daily cdrom's s

Bug#225344: base-config: aptitude dependency breaks debootstrap and pbuilder

Package: base-config Version: 2.03 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #225344 Hi, Note that this bug breaks debootstrap (aptitude is not installed, base-config can't be configured, debootstrap exits with an errorcode) and consequently pbuilder, which expects debootstrap to succeed. IMHO, front

Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash

Barry Hawkins wrote: > Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I > almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my > curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit > the effort to file an installation report? If not,

Re: Installation Report

Erich Waelde wrote: > Boot: > net DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium > > Yes, I would like to have an "expert" switch, too :-) There is one now.. > choose mirror ... > proxy = http://192.168.1.42:80/apt-cacher/ > will not work for installer download, but would be nice. Details? > mounting partit

Bug#225370: step forward

Sven Luther wrote: > Ah, that explains it. > > The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m. > > I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with > the normal modules or something such. The -small has a lot more stuff > modular so it can fit on a mib

Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash

On Dec 30, 2003, at 10:25 AM, Joey Hess wrote: Barry Hawkins wrote: List, I have purchased a 1GHz 15" PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for those being

Processed: reassign to kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386 Bug#222374: d-i melts screen on sis 630 laptop Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386'. > retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way Bug#222374: d-i melts

Bug#222374: reassign to kernel

reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386 retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way thanks Summarising: vesafb is built as a module in the debian kernel, and d-i tries to modprobe it, falling back on the less portable vga16fb if it fails to load. We're told that there is no way

Bug#225370: step forward

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:04:30AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > Ah, that explains it. > > > > The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m. > > > > I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with > > the normal modules or somethi

Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash

Barry Hawkins wrote: > List, > I have purchased a 1GHz 15" PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an > installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my > iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for > those being back up, so I am still trying

Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash

List, I have purchased a 1GHz 15" PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for those being back up, so I am still trying to use this one. My installation fa

Bug#225370: step forward

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto: > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100,

Bug#225370: debian-installer: cannot start init on powerpc

Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:23, Sven Luther ha scritto: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Giuseppe Sacco wrote: [...] > > CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y > > # CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set > > > > Perhaps this means you need to boot with devfs=mount,dall > > Is that not the case

Bug#225370: step forward

Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > Detecting hardware... [...] > > then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage' > > This must be the problem. 2.4.22-3 says : > > kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc (2.4.22-

Bug#225370: debian-installer: cannot start init on powerpc

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > After the normal hardware recognition by the kernel the system did not > > start correctly init, giving this error message: > > > > Freeing unused kernel memory: 184k init 4k chrp 36k prep > > Warning: unable to

Bug#225370: step forward

Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > > Detecting hardware... > > [...] > > > Ide

Bug#225370: step forward

On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > Detecting hardware... > [...] > > > then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage' > > > > This m

Bug#225370: step forward

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Detecting hardware... > Loading modules... > Detected module '[Unknown]' for 'Unknown MATSHITACD-RW CW-8121' > Detected modules 'sungem' for 'Apple Computer Inc. Uninorth GMAC' > Trying to load module 'sungem' > Could not load driver

Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration

Package: netcfg Tags: d-i Severity: wishlist Am Sam, den 27.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 10:46: > - Forwarded message from Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-26 12:33]: > | * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-20 11:10]

  1   2   >