Re: discover action items

2003-10-01 Thread Eric Gillespie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes: > Mmm, consider it fixed ;-) Suits me. > Are you on the mailinglist debian-boot ? Yes. -- Eric Gillespie <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: E: Unimplemented function

2003-10-01 Thread vetsel.patrice
I'v got the same error too. Le jeu 02/10/2003 à 01:08, Robert Millan a écrit : > Hi! > > You might have noticed this already, but.. > > When running the latest d-i test iso image, I get a weird "Unimplemented > function" error. > > Bochs snapshot attached. -- Administrateur du forum d'entre-ai

Re: Trying again

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:18:53PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:44, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > > Where can I find what is considered *the* businesscard ISO to test? > > People have told me that the current snapshots are known unusable. > > Is this still the case? I

Re: create netinst

2003-10-01 Thread Chris Tillman
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:34:32PM +0200, d00f wrote: > Hi > > I want to install woody distrib on a new server IBM 335 but i need the > MPT SCSI driver, bcm5700 ethernel driver . After lot of pb, i want to do > my own netinst ISO. > > How can i do a custom netinst ? Where can i find doc or i

updating doc/TODO

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
Hello, It is me pestering you, yes you ;-) to update the TODO file in the doc dir. Geert Stappers $ cvs diff -u doc/TODO Index: doc/TODO === RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/doc/TODO,v retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r

Re: discover action items

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:57:06PM -0400, Eric Gillespie wrote: > Hi, I am working on debian-boot's issues with discover. Jeff Licquia > forwarded me this mail from Petter Reinholdtsen listing the out-standing > issues. I can't reproduce two of them. If there are others, please > send them to me

Re: d-i initial boot problem

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:37:22PM +0200, thomas corda wrote: > >Thanks for telling. Are you willing to tell more? > >Like which images from which site you use. > >Tell also more about the hardware you are using. > > I've used the images from > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386

patch to reduce the size of discover-data-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi Jeff I was working on discover2 during d-i debcamp last week. I'm sending you my changes to integrate them into the discover2 packages. I hope you will find some time to work on them again soon. These are the changes: Makefile: - only include needed devicetypes (instead of excluding uneeded on

E: Unimplemented function

2003-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
Hi! You might have noticed this already, but.. When running the latest d-i test iso image, I get a weird "Unimplemented function" error. Bochs snapshot attached. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possessio

Re: tail rootskel/linuxrc inconsistent

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Geert Stappers wrote: > > In rootskel are three versions of linuxrc. > > I was expecting that they all all three the same, however: > > The usb one is not complete and may actually be removed (if I manage to > cram usb storage support on

Re: Start using new SETTITLE cdebconf command

2003-10-01 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:22:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I just implemented and commited a new cdebconf command, SETTITLE. > This will set the debconf title from a template description, making it > possible to translate titles. [...] Back to this issue, translators have begun to

create netinst

2003-10-01 Thread d00f
Hi I want to install woody distrib on a new server IBM 335 but i need the MPT SCSI driver, bcm5700 ethernel driver . After lot of pb, i want to do my own netinst ISO. How can i do a custom netinst ? Where can i find doc or information on how to do it ? does i need my own debian mirror ? W

Re: d-i initial boot problem

2003-10-01 Thread thomas corda
Thanks for telling. Are you willing to tell more? Like which images from which site you use. Tell also more about the hardware you are using. I've used the images from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ The PC: Dual Celeron 500 (Abit BP6 MoBo) 256MB RAM 4 hd + 2 cd drives graph

Re: Milo

2003-10-01 Thread Falk Hueffner
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Okay, in Joey's summary of Oldenberg he hints @ Milo Source being > unavailable. Well, there's a version from Stefan Reinauer from Suse (http://www.suse.de/~stepan/), but it is difficult to compile with a non-Suse kernel source. He even has some source b

Re: d-i initial boot problem

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:15:07PM +0200, thomas corda wrote: > The initial boot hangs with: > modprobe: failed to load module vesafb > > I've tried mono and video=vga16:off as boot options. Same problem... > > I've tried both the businesscard and netinst iso. > Thanks for telling. Are you will

Re: d-i and the archive

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:34:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I think a source package has this in favor of it: We need the built > images to be uploaded somewhere, and there's already the whole mechanism > for autobuilders to upload what their source packages build. Plus all > the tracking of faile

Re: discover action items

2003-10-01 Thread Eric Gillespie
Hi, I am working on debian-boot's issues with discover. Jeff Licquia forwarded me this mail from Petter Reinholdtsen listing the out-standing issues. I can't reproduce two of them. If there are others, please send them to me. > - fix segfault if /etc/discover.conf is missing > > - Fix segfau

Re: d-i and the archive

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:41:30AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote: > Am Di, den 30.09.2003 schrieb Geert Stappers um 23:26: > > > > - Anna should be able to fetch from stable/testing/sid. That should be > > > a question with priority low, with defaulting to the suite the image > > > was build with

d-i initial boot problem

2003-10-01 Thread thomas corda
The initial boot hangs with: modprobe: failed to load module vesafb I've tried mono and video=vga16:off as boot options. Same problem... I've tried both the businesscard and netinst iso. -Thomas _ Wußten Sie, daß Sie Ihren Hotmail-P

Re: tail rootskel/linuxrc inconsistent

2003-10-01 Thread Fabian Franz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2003 19:03 schrieb Geert Stappers: > Hello, > > In rootskel are three versions of linuxrc. > I was expecting that they all all three the same, however: > > $ tail -6 linuxrc* > ==> linuxrc <== > mount -t proc proc proc > mount -

There it is! Where? There it is! Oh! There!

2003-10-01 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:15, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:59:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > Okay, in Joey's summary of Oldenberg he hints @ Milo Source being > > unavailable. > > > > I have versions 0.13 thru 0.27 (dated between Jan 1995 and Aug 1996) > > Mmm, unable t

Re: reverting PowerPC kernel to 2.4.21

2003-10-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:31:02PM +0200, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > * Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-01 11:38]: > | The PowerPC images do not build because they try to use 2.4.22, > | which has not been uploaded yet. Unless there is an objection, I > | am going to revert it to 2.4.21 until

Re: tail rootskel/linuxrc inconsistent

2003-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Geert Stappers wrote: > In rootskel are three versions of linuxrc. > I was expecting that they all all three the same, however: The usb one is not complete and may actually be removed (if I manage to cram usb storage support onto the regular boot floppy). > Shouldn't DEBCONF_DEBUG and BOOT_DEBUG

Re: reverting PowerPC kernel to 2.4.21

2003-10-01 Thread Thorsten Sauter
* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-01 11:38]: | The PowerPC images do not build because they try to use 2.4.22, | which has not been uploaded yet. Unless there is an objection, I | am going to revert it to 2.4.21 until such an kernel image is | uploaded. damn yeah. I'm waiting for Sven to

Re: Milo

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:59:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > Okay, in Joey's summary of Oldenberg he hints @ Milo Source being > unavailable. > > I have versions 0.13 thru 0.27 (dated between Jan 1995 and Aug 1996) Mmm, unable to convert that to url. > > Is this the stuff that is needed? or

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hi, * Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-01 16:38]: | On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:31:48PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: | > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:01:49AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: | > > On New World PowerPC systems, we use mac-fdisk. On PREP PowerPC | > > systems, we use fdisk. | >

Re: d-i and the archive

2003-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:08:14PM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote: > > Indeed. But it is a prerequisite to autobuilding images. I believe we > > need a separate autobuilding process, which rebuilds images whenever a > > udeb of the initial boot-image gets updated. > > To check that

Re: d-i and the archive

2003-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Sebastian Ley wrote: > Am Di, den 30.09.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 18:24: > > > What's the advantage of a -src package instead of a source package? > > Hm, good question... What will the buildds do with non .deb packages? I > had in mind to to something similar like the debian-cd package... > Perh

Re: d-i and the archive

2003-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
I think a source package has this in favor of it: We need the built images to be uploaded somewhere, and there's already the whole mechanism for autobuilders to upload what their source packages build. Plus all the tracking of failed builds and so on. All we need is a hack on the autobuilders to re

tail rootskel/linuxrc inconsistent

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
Hello, In rootskel are three versions of linuxrc. I was expecting that they all all three the same, however: $ tail -6 linuxrc* ==> linuxrc <== mount -t proc proc proc mount -t devfs devfs dev # Close all open files on the initrd, and run busybox init. rm -f linuxrc # this program ln -s /sbin/ini

Milo

2003-10-01 Thread Greg Folkert
Okay, in Joey's summary of Oldenberg he hints @ Milo Source being unavailable. I have versions 0.13 thru 0.27 (dated between Jan 1995 and Aug 1996) Is this the stuff that is needed? or are we talking about the stuff that used to be available @ genie.ucd.ie ? (University College, Dublin, Ireland)

Re: Trying again

2003-10-01 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:44, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > Where can I find what is considered *the* businesscard ISO to test? People have told me that the current snapshots are known unusable. Is this still the case? I had wanted to give d-i another go. D. -- Daniel Silverstone

Re: Canada French Keyboard and Language settings from the Install

2003-10-01 Thread amck
>Hi, > >Could someone tell me if the regular >querty french canadian keyboard (alias IBM typewriter and CF >windows settings with 863 code page) is accessible and >competently installed from the upcoming new Sarge Installer. > As the maintainer of console-data and kbd-chooser in Sarge, I should an

Re: Canada French Keyboard and Language settings from the Install

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:42:18AM -0400, Normand Leclerc wrote: > Could someone tell me if the regular > querty french canadian keyboard (alias IBM typewriter and CF > windows settings with 863 code page) is accessible and > competently installed from the upcoming new Sarge Installer. > > Years a

Canada French Keyboard and Language settings from the Install

2003-10-01 Thread Normand Leclerc
Hi, Could someone tell me if the regular querty french canadian keyboard (alias IBM typewriter and CF windows settings with 863 code page) is accessible and competently installed from the upcoming new Sarge Installer. Years ago I tried debian 1.1 and more recently tried Slackware 9.0 and did not

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:31:48PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:01:49AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > On New World PowerPC systems, we use mac-fdisk. On PREP PowerPC > > systems, we use fdisk. > > OK, so it's a subarchitecture problem, not an architecture problem

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:01:49AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On New World PowerPC systems, we use mac-fdisk. On PREP PowerPC > systems, we use fdisk. OK, so it's a subarchitecture problem, not an architecture problem. That was what I asked about four mails ago. :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: h

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:56:39PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:28:37PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > Because it can't use just any partioning program, it uses a > > particular one (or, actually, a particular one, two, or three) > > depending on the architecture.

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:56:39PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > If parted is not (for our purposes) usable on hppa, we do not build it for > hppa. (That should be quite easy to change.) Likewise, we only build the > other udebs for the platform we intend it to be used on. parted is used fo

Bug#212072: RAV AntiVirus scan results

2003-10-01 Thread RAV
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 23 more days to evaluate. Running on host: home.becks.com.br --- RAV Antivirus results --- The infected file was saved

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Ole-Egil Hvitmyren
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:28:37PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Because it can't use just any partioning program, it uses a particular one (or, actually, a particular one, two, or three) depending on the architecture. If we depend on a virtual partitioning-program package,

Bug#212072: RAV AntiVirus scan results

2003-10-01 Thread RAV
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 23 more days to evaluate. Running on host: home.becks.com.br --- RAV Antivirus results --- The infected file was saved

Re: libdebian-installer - proposal: usage of ERROR log level

2003-10-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Can this be used for out of disk space errors also? it will just catch any error with ERROR level. bastian -- There are certain things men must do to remain men. -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4929.4

Re: d-i, pulling in fdisk-udeb

2003-10-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:28:37PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > Because it can't use just any partioning program, it uses a > particular one (or, actually, a particular one, two, or three) > depending on the architecture. If we depend on a virtual > partitioning-program package, it could install par

Re: libdebian-installer - proposal: usage of ERROR log level

2003-10-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > hi folks > > the error log level in libdebian-installer is currently marked as > critical, i.e. is always exits. my proposal is, that it should display a > internal error message via debconf if available. this should only be > used f

d-i policy

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, Here is my first draft of a d-i policy guide. I've folded in the requirements from cheatsheet.txt (which is obsoleted and removed), as well as some recent list discussions. Any objections? -- Matty Index: doc/cheatsheet.txt ==

reverting PowerPC kernel to 2.4.21

2003-10-01 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, The PowerPC images do not build because they try to use 2.4.22, which has not been uploaded yet. Unless there is an objection, I am going to revert it to 2.4.21 until such an kernel image is uploaded. -- Matty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#210968: {Virus?} Bug Letter

2003-10-01 Thread admin
content filters said: MailScanner: La e-mail contiene un messaggio HTML con tag IFrame pericolosi Note to Help Desk: Look on UNIPV-MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20031001 (message h917V0a86014). -- Postmaster Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support Comunicaz

Bug#212981: {Virus?} Error Notice

2003-10-01 Thread Network Message Delivery Service
content filters said: MailScanner: La e-mail contiene un messaggio HTML con tag IFrame pericolosi Note to Help Desk: Look on UNIPV-MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20031001 (message h917Vea93074). -- Postmaster Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support Comunicaz