Your message dated Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:17:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202562: fixed in yaboot-installer 0.0.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
yaboot-installer_0.0.5.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.5.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.5.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.5_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.5_powerpc.udeb
Rejected: no signature found in yaboot-installer_0.0.5_powerpc.changes.
Rejected: no signature found in yaboot-installer_0.0.5.dsc.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 212919 install
Bug#212919: autopartkit is default if created-fstab is missing
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Bug reassigned from package `installer' to `install'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:24:51PM -0400, Levi Bard wrote:
> Could someone pull off an install using the compact floppy set with 8MB of
> RAM? I see that the installation guide now says 12MB required, but does
> this pertain to a standard bf2.4 or idepci boot, or is that the minimum
> now for comp
Hi there,
I don't know if anyone has reported this problem before (I'd bet that someone
has, but I can't find any reference to it), but the Woody installer doesn't
tell dpkg which kernel-image was used during installation. So, unless you
change your kernel-image after installation is complete,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 211063
Bug#211063: autopartkit: should not re-ask for confirmation
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:31:06PM +0200, Joost Ringoot wrote:
> I am a total newbie with debian. I did some things with redhat and suse
> before. But in general I am just a curious linuxfan, because I feel that
> microsoft monoculture is unhealthy for my mind and wallet.
>
> I am trying to get a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 212785 rootskel
Bug#212785: base-installer: tries to install queued packages multiple times
Bug reassigned from package `base-installer' to `rootskel'.
> tags 212785 + pending
Bug#212785: base-installer: tries to install queued packages multip
Hello,
Does this make sense:
Index: doc/menu-item-numbers.txt
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/doc/menu-item-numbers.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 menu-item-numbers.txt
--- doc/menu-item-numbers.txt
.dsc
busybox-cvs_20030926-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20030926-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs_20030926.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20030926.orig.tar.gz
Changes: busybox-cvs (20030926-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* new cvs version
* Makefile
- fix
adopt these translations unless libtextwrap part of my patch is
accepted, because Japaneese text is not well displayed (at some places)
by tasksel.
Could you please test my patch?
---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/
tasksel-i18n-20030926.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 212771 d-i
Bug#212771: netcfg should allow to use "back" button
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: d-i
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212771 + d-i
Bug#212771: netcfg should allow to use "back" button
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> tags 211147 + d-i
Bug#211147: lilo(?) install fails; reboot after "booting the kernel"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> th
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:31:20PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with
> >> shared library internals, but I believe a w
[Cc:ed to Mario on account of the lists.d.o mail delays]
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:27:06PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:50:53PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> >> Now, the question is what would be the proper fix for this problem.
Arg, resending...
Drew Daniels
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:06:20 -0500 (CDT)
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: d-i minimum system requirements
Hi,
I was wondering if there was any speculation on what the minimum
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
> Does this mean I should nag Tollef even more? =)
No, it mean that someone should write and commit the frontend into
CVS. I believe it is a waste of time to wait any longer for Tollef to
do this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
> > I was wondering if there was any speculation on what the minimum system
> > requirements for d-i are.
> >
> > Is 4MB, 8MB, 12MB enough ram? How close are things to any real RAM limit?
>
> More like 32 mb. There is a cool hack involving LVM and a live cd
> filesystem that should reduce this to
Package: base-installer
Severity: normal
Several install reports mention problems when a debootstrap run fails
for some reason, and then future runs die because debootstrap is not
idempotent. We came up with a way to avoid this problem:
Before debootstrap is run, list all files in /target.
If the
Package: main-menu
Version: 0.038
We should stop using udeb package descriptions for menu items in
main-menu (and anna). Instead, each read the description of the
debconf question named menu-item/ for each package that
provides an item on the menu.
This will let us move all the localisable stri
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.42
We shoul add a new command to the debconf protocol, SETTITILE, which
takes a template name and sets the debconf title to the description of
the template. This will allow us to localise titles.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.42
We should modify cdebconf to do a compare of the English text and
merge when loading new templates. This is to support add-on modules
that may contain a complete translation for a given language, detached
from the modules that are translated.
If the English text
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> OK, here's a slightly different proposal for how to handle "fset seen" stuff
> (there is code in d-i ATM that just does "fset seen false" on a question
> before asking it, which is very very bad in an automated install...):
>
> If "seen=true", then simply lower the pr
> for pkg in $@ ; do
> -echo "$pkg" >> /var/lib/apt-install/queue
> +if ! grep -q "$pkg" /var/lib/apt-install/queue; then
> +echo "$pkg" >> /var/lib/apt-install/queue
> +fi
> done
I believe this should grep with "^$pkg$" to avoid matching substrings.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
> I talked to pere and he told me to ask you for cvs commit rights to the
> debian installer cvs. I have done some work on yaboot-installer and
> other powerpc related stuff, which I need to commit.
I can verify that I believe this is a good idea.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:03:32AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > This isn't really an issue, since when d-i is finished, we can run with
> > priority high, which won't display the main menu. For now, we want to keep
> > it at medium for debugging reasons.
>
> How will a language be chosen then?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 06:18:40PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> There should be an noninteractive frontend in cdebconf, to handle
> automatic installation. It should use the currently set value for all
> debconf questions, and behave like the noninteractive debconf
> frontend.
Does this me
OK, here's a slightly different proposal for how to handle "fset seen" stuff
(there is code in d-i ATM that just does "fset seen false" on a question
before asking it, which is very very bad in an automated install...):
If "seen=true", then simply lower the priority one notch before deciding to
as
Could someone pull off an install using the compact floppy set with 8MB of
RAM? I see that the installation guide now says 12MB required, but does
this pertain to a standard bf2.4 or idepci boot, or is that the minimum
now for compact as well?
Thanks,
Levi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.42
Severity: wishlist
There should be an noninteractive frontend in cdebconf, to handle
automatic installation. It should use the currently set value for all
debconf questions, and behave like the noninteractive debconf
frontend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Martin Sjögren wrote:
> This isn't really an issue, since when d-i is finished, we can run with
> priority high, which won't display the main menu. For now, we want to keep
> it at medium for debugging reasons.
I think that now is a good time to figure out what breaks when we go to
high priority.
Package: base-config
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-26
Followup-For: Bug #208961
As it was pointed out on i18n, there were some problems with the
translations. Here's the correct version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux c40 2.6.0-t
Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> I was wondering if there was any speculation on what the minimum system
> requirements for d-i are.
>
> Is 4MB, 8MB, 12MB enough ram? How close are things to any real RAM limit?
More like 32 mb. There is a cool hack involving LVM and a live cd
filesystem that should re
One of (hopefully) several meeting summaries to be posted to this list.
To complete the i18n framework of d-i, we need:
1. Stop using udeb package descriptions for menu items in main-menu (and
anna). Instead, each read the description of the debconf question
named menu-item/ for each packag
The changes done in CVS before autopartkit 0.58 upload seem to have broken my
patch -- at least I'm still getting asked even when fset seen=true and
value=true, which I didn't with my patch. Reopening.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Debian-Sarge interested community,
I downloaded the complete Sarge-ISO-CD-Images (11 pieces, dated with 21. September
2003) and the
floppy-image.img and cd_drivers-image.img, dated with: 24. September 2003 from
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
to install it:
the installatio
I've implemented solution #2 (it was a two-line fix) in rootskel CVS --
tagging this bug as pending and reassigning it to rootskel.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: base-config
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-26
Followup-For: Bug #208961
The previous translation had some technical problems. Here's a fix.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux c40 2.6.0-test4 #1 Fri Aug 29 18:32:23 CEST 2003 i
Package: installation
Version: N/A
Severity: Normal
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:35:50AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > I chose the language, which was fine, but I agree (and I think there
> > > may already be a bug) that the Ch
Hi
I talked to pere and he told me to ask you for cvs commit rights to the
debian installer cvs. I have done some work on yaboot-installer and
other powerpc related stuff, which I need to commit.
thanks
gaudenz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
I am a total newbie with debian. I did some things with redhat and suse
before. But in general I am just a curious linuxfan, because I feel that
microsoft monoculture is unhealthy for my mind and wallet.
I am trying to get a fully functional debian system, but I get several
corrupt packages and s
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:03:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#212072: fixed in efi-reader 0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Accepted:
efi-reader_0.3.dsc
to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.3.dsc
efi-reader_0.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.3.tar.gz
efi-reader_0.3_ia64.udeb
to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.3_ia64.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 212072
Thank you for yo
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_0.036.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.036.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.036.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.036.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.036_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.036_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_0.29.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.29.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.29.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.29.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.29_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.29_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
Accepted:
languagechooser_0.031.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.031.dsc
languagechooser_0.031.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.031.tar.gz
languagechooser_0.031_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.031_all.udeb
Announcing to [EM
Hi Man,
I do that... I create the initrd... but the machine don't boot!
:(
@ 24/9, Steve Langasek:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:01:09PM -0300, Jozeph Brasil wrote:
> > Thank you for reply-me back!
>
> > > The next incarnation of the Debian installer (which is what this mailing
> > > list is for)
> I have found two races conditions in the run() function of busybox's
> init implementation (static pid_t run(const struct init_action *a)).
Ive applied your patch as is to cvs.
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:35:50AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > I chose the language, which was fine, but I agree (and I think there
> > may already be a bug) that the Choose language should be a separate
> > dialog, ala boot-floppies, so people that don't read English have a
> > chance. If I
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:01:09PM -0300, Jozeph Brasil wrote:
> Thank you for reply-me back!
> > The next incarnation of the Debian installer (which is what this mailing
> > list is for) seems to have some support for LVM/EVMS. For woody, the
> > steps you describe above seem very correct, excep
hi
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 05:22, Chris Tillman wrote:
> I tried the powerpc version of the installer built recently by Gaudenz
> Steinlin. Since the root image was missing modprobe, I wasn't able to
> get too far. But seeing a lot of errors gave me some insight into the
> error handling code, and
Hi,
I was wondering if there was any speculation on what the minimum system
requirements for d-i are.
Is 4MB, 8MB, 12MB enough ram? How close are things to any real RAM limit?
The current kernel used should make d-i usable on a 386 and newer for ia32
arches due to math emulation being turned on?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> After my latest dist-upgrade && cvs update, I found it necessary to
> apply the attached patch to d-i CVS for mklibs to run correctly.
> Without it, mklibs fails with the error,
>
> Library not found: libdiscover.so.1 in path: /li
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0300, Alexandre wrote:
> Gostaria de saber como posso baixar o debian mais recente e seu disco
> de boot tenho umdisco de boot mais não sei se vai funcionar para
> instalar o debian potato muito antigo por favor se puder me ajudar.
A lingua franca desta lista
55 matches
Mail list logo
