Processed: Tag lots of d-i bugs (still lots more left, though :-) )

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 157888 + d-i Bug#157888: (c)debconf-copydb: do not handle --config=Foo:bar There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > tags 195704 + d-i Bug#195704: cdebconf - text frontend progress bar is unusable on TERM=dumb There were no tags set. Tags added: d

Bug#200643: marked as done (autopartkit: suboptimal partitioning in a 3Gb disk)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:24:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line autopartkit: suboptimal partitioning in a 3Gb disk has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#193283: marked as done (main-menu should detect when a previously failing menu item now succeeds, and re-adjust debconf/priority)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:11:42 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line main-menu should detect when a previously failing menu item now succeeds, and re-adjust debconf/priority has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Reassign 211630 to console-data-at

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 211630 console-data-at Bug#211630: kbdchooser: [fr-latin1] made an error Warning: Unknown package 'console-data-at' Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `console-data-at'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

pcmcia-udeb_0.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: pcmcia-udeb_0.4.dsc to pool/main/p/pcmcia-udeb/pcmcia-udeb_0.4.dsc pcmcia-udeb_0.4.tar.gz to pool/main/p/pcmcia-udeb/pcmcia-udeb_0.4.tar.gz pcmcia-udeb_0.4_all.udeb to pool/main/p/pcmcia-udeb/pcmcia-udeb_0.4_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution

Re: travel to oldenburg, and the event itself

On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:07:50PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > * Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030922 10:46]: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:15:49PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > So far the reminder. > > I miss the fact that the "d-i people" are guest on a Linux porters party, > > b

Re: travel to oldenburg, and the event itself

On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:51:48PM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote: > Am Mo, 2003-09-22 um 10.45 schrieb Geert Stappers: > > > About the network infrastructure: > > > > May I run a DHCP server on the network? > > The DHCPD should tell which image to transfer by tftp. > > As Joey mentioned earlier, we

prebaseconfig_0.035_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: prebaseconfig_0.035.dsc to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.035.dsc prebaseconfig_0.035.tar.gz to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.035.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.035_all.udeb to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.035_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] T

Bug#211315: marked as done (cdebconf: SEGVs on console-tools/arch input)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:26:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Permanently close bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cdebconf 0.42

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 211315 + fixed Bug#211315: cdebconf: SEGVs on console-tools/arch input Tags were: pending d-i Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#187135: (no subject)

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#210968: (no subject)

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#211246: (no subject)

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#212499: (no subject)

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cdebconf override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): cdebconf_0.42_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package

Fixed in NMU of cdebconf 0.42

tag 211315 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:04:11 +0200 Source: cdebconf Binary: cdebconf-slang-udeb libdebconfclient0 cde

cdebconf_0.42_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.42_i386.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.42_i386.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.42_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.42_i386.udeb cdebconf-s

pcmcia-udeb_0.4_i386.changes is NEW

(new) pcmcia-udeb_0.4.dsc standard debian-installer (new) pcmcia-udeb_0.4.tar.gz standard debian-installer (new) pcmcia-udeb_0.4_all.udeb standard debian-installer Start PC card services (PCMCIA) Changes: pcmcia-udeb (0.4) unstable; urgency=low . * ftp-master please note: I do know what I'm doin

Bug#211243: marked as done (autopartkit: package description is wrong)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:02:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#211243: fixed in autopartkit 0.58 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#211063: marked as done (autopartkit: should not re-ask for confirmation)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:02:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#211063: fixed in autopartkit 0.58 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

autopartkit_0.58_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: autopartkit_0.58.dsc to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.58.dsc autopartkit_0.58.tar.gz to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.58.tar.gz autopartkit_0.58_i386.udeb to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.58_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 211063 2112

base-installer_0.031_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_0.031.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.031.dsc base-installer_0.031.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.031.tar.gz base-installer_0.031_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.031_i386.udeb kernel-installer_0.031_a

languagechooser_0.030_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: languagechooser_0.030.dsc to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.030.dsc languagechooser_0.030.tar.gz to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.030.tar.gz languagechooser_0.030_all.udeb to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_0.030_all.udeb Announcing to [EM

Re: Debian Linux

Olá, > Gostaria de saber como posso baixar o debian mais recente e seu disco de boot tenho > umdisco de boot mais não sei se vai funcionar para instalar o debian potato muito > antigo por favor se puder me ajudar. Você poderá baixar os discos de instalação no próprio FTP do Projeto GNU/Debian.

pcmcia-udeb_0.3_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi, The udeb appears to have no files in it. If this is intentional then I apologise and please feel free to re-upload with a note to make sure noone rejects it again. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -

pcmcia-udeb_0.2_i386.changes REJECTED

See previous reject message === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian Linux

Gostaria de saber como posso baixar o debian mais recente e seu disco de boot tenho umdisco de boot mais não sei se vai funcionar para instalar o debian potato muito antigo por favor se puder me ajudar.     Aguardo resposta . Obrigado.

Bug#195704: cdebconf - text frontend progress bar is unusable on TERM=dumb

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:37:20AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > The text frontent don't look at TERM and you have a terminal which > supports \r. Ah, so the real bug is that the text frontend doesn't look at TERM? :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#195704: cdebconf - text frontend progress bar is unusable on TERM=dumb

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:48:54PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I can't reproduce #195704. I set TERM=dumb and run the progress bar test with > the text frontend in cdebconf, but everything appears normal. The text frontent don't look at TERM and you have a terminal which supports \r. >

Bug#210968: {Virus?} Last Network Upgrade

this message to hand when you call. At Wed Sep 24 08:03:45 2003 the virus scanner said: Update917.exe Infection: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Executable DOS/Windows programs are dangerous in email (Update917.exe) Note to Help Desk: Look on mail.aiza.ltd.uk in /var/spool/MailScanner/quar

Bug#202562: yaboot-installer partition description

On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 08:26, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-24 01:44]: > | On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:58, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > | > Would it not be better to display the extended info, and strip it away > | > before passing it to yabootconfig? > | I wa