Hi..
I imagine the correct fix is simply not to tag discover.conf as a conffile, so
dpkg doesn't play fast and loose with renaming it. Hence add a:
rm -f debian/discover-udeb/DEBIAN/conffiles
right after the call to dh_installdeb when building discover-udeb.
This seems to work fine.
=)
Peter
O
Hi Jeff...
In addition to the three patches I sent earlier for discover to build from
source, I suggest the attached patch to debian/rules, which simply adds a '.'
in an opportune place, so the libdiscover.so symlink is not added to the udeb
(it's not needed, and it causes the installer's libra
Your message dated Sun, 01 Jun 2003 07:47:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191594: fixed in lilo-installer 0.0.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 01 Jun 2003 07:47:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#194821: fixed in grub-installer 0.0.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
lilo-installer_0.0.14.dsc
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.0.14.dsc
lilo-installer_0.0.14.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.0.14.tar.gz
lilo-installer_0.0.14_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.0.14_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMA
Accepted:
grub-installer_0.0.10.dsc
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.10.dsc
grub-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.0.10_i386.udeb
to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.0.10_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMA
lilo-installer_0.0.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lilo-installer_0.0.14.dsc
lilo-installer_0.0.14.tar.gz
lilo-installer_0.0.14_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
grub-installer_0.0.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_0.0.10.dsc
grub-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.0.10_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 185574 + pending
Bug#185574: : di-utils-generic: mapdevfs do not support software RAID devices
(/dev/md/0)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
[Herbert Xu]
> FWIW, I posted a script ages ago to produce the data file containing
> network devices for discover v1 directly from a kernel-image
> package. This can be easily extended to cover other PCI devices.
I got a script to update v1 discover-data files with the module names
listed in /li
Hi Peter,
* Peter Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-01 07:11]:
> Quick question: How does one make dpkg-scanpackages look for udebs so I can
> generate a local apt-able repository of udebs?
take a look at pere's d-i page:
http://people.debian.org/~pere/debian-installer/archive.html
Bye
Thor
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want the code to handle v2 to be as short and easy to handle as the
> v1 code.
FWIW, I posted a script ages ago to produce the data file containing
network devices for discover v1 directly from a kernel-image package.
This can be easily extende
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> developer:~# discover --data-path=linux/module/name \
> --data-version=2.4 -t -d all -e ata -e pci -e pcmcia -e scsi display
> --data-version has no meaning without --data-path.
I found the problem. Removing '-t' got rid of this error. But I get
two empty lines in
sön 2003-06-01 klockan 10.35 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
> > I'm trying to test these now. I'll let you know about my progress.
>
> OK. This new version is better, but there are still some problems.
> I'm testing in the d-i chroot.
>
> First of all, discover still segfaul
Your message dated Sun, 1 Jun 2003 10:43:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195648: cdebconf: Fuzzy string may be unfizzied in debian/po/fr.po
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> I'm trying to test these now. I'll let you know about my progress.
OK. This new version is better, but there are still some problems.
I'm testing in the d-i chroot.
First of all, discover still segfaults when /etc/discover.conf is
missing. And it is still missing becaus
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> please provide a complete diff.
Well, just though that the fix was trivial enough.. :-)
Anyway, here it is.
diff -Nru cdebconf-0.38.orig/debian/po/fr.po cdebconf-0.38/debian/po/fr.po
--- cdebconf-0.38.orig/debian/po/fr.po 2003-06-01 10:09:05.0
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:07:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The string curretly marked as fuzzy in the fr.po file may be "unfizzied" as
> the translation is IMHO OK.
please provide a complete diff.
bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of
[Jeff Licquia]
> I've stashed discover 2.0.2-0.0.0.2 and discover-data 2.2003.02.05-2
> packages in http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/discover/. Again,
> please don't upload these or otherwise give them "official" status.
I'm trying to test these now. I'll let you know about my progress.
> -
Package: cdebconf
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-01
Severity: minor
The string curretly marked as fuzzy in the fr.po file may be "unfizzied" as
the translation is IMHO OK.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mykerinos 2.4.21-rc2 #1 mer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 181271 rootskel
Bug#181271: rootskel: Alt-Ctrl-Del should reboot the machine
Bug reassigned from package `busybox-udeb' to `rootskel'.
> tags 181271 + pending
Bug#181271: rootskel: Alt-Ctrl-Del should reboot the machine
There were no tags set.
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:11:05PM +1000, Peter Hawkins wrote:
> Quick question: How does one make dpkg-scanpackages look for udebs so I can
> generate a local apt-able repository of udebs?
use apt-ftparchive
| Packages::Extensions ".deb .udeb";
bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house
Hi...
Quick question: How does one make dpkg-scanpackages look for udebs so I can
generate a local apt-able repository of udebs?
=)
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 31 May 2003 20:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193160: fixed in base-installer 0.022
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Accepted:
base-installer_0.022.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.022.dsc
base-installer_0.022.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.022.tar.gz
base-installer_0.022_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.022_all.udeb
kernel-installer_0.022_all
base-installer_0.022_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_0.022.dsc
base-installer_0.022.tar.gz
base-installer_0.022_all.udeb
kernel-installer_0.022_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
26 matches
Mail list logo
