Re: partitioner_0.01_i386.changes REJECTED

James Troup wrote: > Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Rejected: partitioner_0.01_i386.udeb: architecture part of filename >> (i386) does not match package architecture in the udeb >> (all). > Wow, good effort. I never expected anyone to trip _that_ > rejection. ;)

Re: partitioner_0.01_i386.changes REJECTED

Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rejected: partitioner_0.01_i386.udeb: architecture part of filename > (i386) does not match package architecture in the udeb > (all). Wow, good effort. I never expected anyone to trip _that_ rejection. ;) -- James -- To UNSU

Re: Bug#185518: kernel-image-2.4.20-udeb: please include e100 and e1000 nic drivers

I believe it needs to be in nic-modules, since aiui that is the one that d-i uses by default. Of course this is all up in the air since network install disk is now bigger than one disk anyway... :\ Hopefully the d-i group can figure out something to make it work. Thanks, Chris On Sun, Mar 30, 20

Re: kernel-image-2.4.20-udeb: please include e100 and e1000 nic drivers

On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 06:37:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Do you want the e1000 module to go into nic-modules or nic-modules-extra? I think -extra would be the best. Because not so many people use 1Gbit network cards in his PC's :) Bye Thorsten -- Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: kernel-image-2.4.20-udeb: please include e100 and e1000 nic drivers

Do you want the e1000 module to go into nic-modules or nic-modules-extra? -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UN

net image full

The net1440 image has been full for a long time, and I guess what moved it over the limit was the addition of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale to rootskel. However, if we want i18n in the net floppy we *will* need that locale, so what other options do we have for trimming things down? I get -35k free

Re: Web pages updated from CVS

On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 11:24:02AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I've checked out a copy to d-i/doc/html/ at > http://people.debian.org/~pere/debian-installer/>, and added a > cron script to keep it up to date. It will have to do until we get > space on a more official location. > > It i

partitioner_0.01_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: partitioner_0.01_i386.udeb: architecture part of filename (i386) does not match package architecture in the udeb (all). === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-installer-utils 0.19

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 184992 + fixed Bug#184992: di-utils-generic: Generates fstab with bad fstype Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed > tag 184994 + fixed Bug#184994: di-utils-generic: Floppy device is /dev/(null) Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed > tag 185261 + f

Fixed in NMU of debian-installer-utils 0.19

tag 184992 + fixed tag 184994 + fixed tag 185261 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:01:13 +0200 Source: debian-installer-uti

debian-installer-utils_0.19_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: debian-installer-utils_0.19.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.19.dsc debian-installer-utils_0.19.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_0.19.tar.gz di-utils-fake-mkfs_0.19_all.udeb to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/d

lvmcfg_0.02_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lvmcfg_0.02.dsc to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.02.dsc lvmcfg_0.02.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.02.tar.gz lvmcfg_0.02_all.udeb to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.02_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processing of lvmcfg_0.02_i386.changes

lvmcfg_0.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lvmcfg_0.02.dsc lvmcfg_0.02.tar.gz lvmcfg_0.02_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Processing of partitioner_0.01_i386.changes

partitioner_0.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partitioner_0.01.dsc partitioner_0.01.tar.gz partitioner_0.01_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Processing of debian-installer-utils_0.19_i386.changes

debian-installer-utils_0.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_0.19.dsc debian-installer-utils_0.19.tar.gz di-utils-generic_0.19_all.udeb di-utils-partitioner_0.19_all.udeb di-utils-fake-partitioner_0.19_all.udeb di-utils-mkfs_0.

Re: Discover 1.5-2 pre-release available

tis 2003-03-25 klockan 20.46 skrev Branden Robinson: > > I notice that your discover-data package on > > hackers.progeny.com/~branden/discover2 also contain the *.lst files, is > > that for backwards compatability and are actually not used? > > Yes, the .lst files are there for backwards compatibi

Re: Status of boot-floppies for Debian 3.0r2

Hi, Sorry to reply to this old message :-) On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:58:17PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > after more than a month of wake-up phase, it is time to push the > development a bit. Boot-Floppies 3.0.24 are almost ready, ports for most > architectures have been build and we