On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:34:48PM +0100, Timothee Besset wrote:
> Speaking about which..
>
> I have a bunch of 7043/150 IBM powerpc (chrp) workstations to test this
> on. Is there anything I can download and try?
No.
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:11, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> The reason (well, the glaring one!) is that the symbol doesn't have UND
> or whatever it takes to match the symbol-finding regexp; however, I
> don't understand mklibs anywhere near enough yet to know if changing
> that is safe, of it it'll l
Howdy,
Rather than perform this cleanup in every package, Linda should
check for these files.
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mklibs
Version: 0.1.8
Severity: important
Tags: patch
calling gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -Wl,-soname=libm.so.6 -ufesetround
-o lib//libm.so.6-so
/home/anthony/cvs/cvs.derobert.net/Soekris/src/libmd5/lib/libmd5_pic.a
-Wl,--version-script=/usr/lib/libm_pic.map -lgcc -L
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:09:52PM +0100, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> I want to help in the development of debian installer and boot process. I
> will appreciate a brief note on which is the status now, how do I catch up
> with the current work, the design guidelines / the goals to achieve, and
> any hel
Howdy,
The daily debian-installer builds have been failing since
2003-01-21 with the following error[1]:
syslinux: not root and no appropriate entry for
/media/home/builder/debian-installer/build/dest/tmp-mnt.img in /etc/fstab
make: *** [dest/net-1440.img] Error 1
Would you please fix this?
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:57:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line does not prompt to eject floppy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Package: rootskel
Version: 0.16
Tags: patch
Checking the latest build log for rootskel, I noticed the following
file:
chroot-unstable/build/buildd/rootskel_0.16_ia64.udeb:
[...]
-rwxr-xr-x root/root828 2003-01-26 11:10:04 ./sbin/.#debian-installer.1.8
It is not supposed to be there. I sugg
Package: rootskel
Version: 0.16
The autobuilders seem to build rootskel just fine, and produces
packages containing the following files:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-01-26 12:07:28 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-01-26 12:07:27 ./dev/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-01-26 12:07
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:26:32PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 09:47, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf
> > > > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs
> > > > and libraries link
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:30:21AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> The boolean dialog should accept [enter] to choose yes/no, instead of
>> having to move to the button to continue.
> [...]
>
> How should [enter] key work?
> a. Select and go to
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:11, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 07:10, Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> > This looks like the familiar problem with mklibs not handling references
> > to data symbols. I'll try to find some time to look at that again this
> > afternoon.
>
> The reason (we
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 07:10, Philip Blundell wrote:
> This looks like the familiar problem with mklibs not handling references
> to data symbols. I'll try to find some time to look at that again this
> afternoon.
The reason (well, the glaring one!) is that the symbol doesn't have UND
or whatever
Hi
I want to help in the development of debian installer and boot process. I
will appreciate a brief note on which is the status now, how do I catch up
with the current work, the design guidelines / the goals to achieve, and
any helpfull notes to get me started quickly on this, so I can begin
work
Title: ÍøÒ×ÓʼþÖÐÐÄ
Õ¼ÓÃÄ㱦¹óµÄ¼¸·ÖÖÓʱ¼äÅóÓÑ--ÔÚÕâÐÅϢΪÖ÷ÌâµÄµÄʱ´úÖÐÄã×¼±¸ºÃÁËÂð¡£²»ÖªÄãÓÐÎÞÏë¹ýͨ¹ý»¥ÁªÍø×¬Ç®ÄØ?
²Æ¸»Ö®´°Ò²ÐíÄܸøÄã´øÀ´Ò»Æ¬Ñô¹â
²Æ¸»Ö®´°
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 09:47, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf
> > > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs
> > > and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave
> > > it to the packa
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 19:39, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> # /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi
> /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi: relocation error: /usr/lib/cgi-bin/login.cgi: symbol
>_ZTIPKc, version GLIBCPP_3.2 not defined in file libstdc++.so.5 with link time
>reference
This looks like the familiar problem
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 04:04, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> I managed to mis-generate a _pic.a file as an empty archive, which
> managed to send mklibs into an infinite loop. It'd be nice if mklibs
> detected when a shared libaries _pic.a did not contain a symbol it was
> supposed to and errored out.
18 matches
Mail list logo