Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 177405 slang
Bug#177405: nano-udeb: fail to run inside debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `slang'.
> severity 177405 wishlist
Bug#177405: nano-udeb: fail to run inside debian-installer
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
ÏÖÔÚ¼ÓÈë¿áÖ©ÖëÍøÃË£¬ÔÂÈëÍòÔª²»ÊÇÌ췽ҹ̷¡£
http£º//wtskin.yeah.net£¨Ç븴ÖÆÕ³ÌùÖÁä¯ÀÀÆ÷µØÖ·À¸£©
ÄúÒ»¶¨²»ÏàÐÅ¡£Æäʵ¸Õ¿ªÊ¼ÎÒÒ²²»ÐÅ¡£
û¹Øϵ¡£Äú¿ÉÒÔÈ¥ÎÒÃǵÄÍøÒ³¿´Ò»¿´£¬http£º//wtskin.yeah.net
×ÐϸµØ¿´¿´ÎÒÃǵÄÔË×÷·½·¨¡¢ÀíÄ»¹ÓÐÎÒÃÇΪÄúÌṩµÄ·þÎñ¡£
Ö»Ðè85Ôª£¬Äú¾Í¿ÉÒÔÖÕÉíÏíÊÜÎÒÃǵķþÎñ¡£
ÕâÀÓи÷ÖÖʵÓ
tag 177346 patch
thanks
Index: main-menu/main-menu.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/main-menu/main-menu.c,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -r1.57 main-menu.c
--- main-menu/main-menu.c 16 Jan 2003 10:48:30 -000
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 177346 patch
Bug#177346: main-menu: useless question when only one option is available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:31:33 -0800
with message-id <20030120093133.GB209@catalunya>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 177405 installation
Bug#177405: nano-udeb: fail to run inside debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package `nano-udeb' to `installation'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Current status, from debian-installer/build/uptodatecheck.sh:
Sid and CVS in sync:
udeb version in cvs version in sid needs upload
--
anna 0.021 0.021 no
cd
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Christian T. Steigies [Sun, Jan 19 2003, 12:47:22AM]:
>
> > I've (re)built boot-floppies for m68k a few days ago and finally managed to
> > test them on my Amiga. Installation went fine. One thing I noticed, the
> > inst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 177459 + pending
Bug#177459: does not set SUITE
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Subject: Re: does not set SUITE
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--text follows this line--
tags 177459 + pending
thanks
Thank you. This patch is now in CVS. I'll wait a few more days to
see if there are more problems hiding, and upload a new version then.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:22:29PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> For both cases, there is also the UI design principle of not changing an
> interface between invocations, which is why you rather gray out and
> disable options (in a GUI) than hide them, when they are unavailable.
> "Things moving a
tag 177445 patch
thanks
--- anna/retriever.c.orig 2003-01-19 18:36:52.0 -0800
+++ anna/retriever.c2003-01-19 18:40:08.0 -0800
@@ -128,13 +128,20 @@
return 0;
debconf = debconfclient_new();
- debconf->command(debconf, "TITLE", "Choose Retrie
Package: prebaseconfig
Version: 0.019
Tags: patch
SUITE should be set to the value of mirror/distribution in
/root/dbootstrap_settings. Else, base-config configures apt to
use woody.
Matt
--- tools/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig.d/90prepare-base-config.orig 2003-01-19
18:22:53.0 -080
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:29:11PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:07:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > OK, please tell me how to list the packages that form part of
> > debian-installer
>
> wget
>http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/debian-installer/binary-i386/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 177445 patch
Bug#177445: useless question asked when only one option is available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> s?n 2003-01-19 klockan 19.07 skrev Colin Watson:
> > OK, please tell me how to list the packages that form part of
> > debian-installer and I'll do it.
>
> What's wrong with the stuff in /org/bugs.qa.debian.org/data/lists? No
> way
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:07:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:52:15PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
> > helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
> > Could someone please create this,
sön 2003-01-19 klockan 19.07 skrev Colin Watson:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:52:15PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
> > helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
> > Could someone please create this, or point me
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:07:42PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:52:15PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
> > helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
> > Could someone please create this,
I had a similar type problem with Slackware and it
really got on my nerves. When I boot with the CD in the drive it boots up,
then says Keyboard timeout - AT Keyboard missing? and then I can't use my
keyboard. The keyboard I use is an older AT keyboard with a PS/2 adapter
on an Asus A7A mo
I had a similar type problem with Slackware and it
really got on my nerves. When I boot with the CD in the drive it boots up,
then says Keyboard timeout - AT Keyboard missing? and then I can't use my
keyboard. The keyboard I use is an older AT keyboard with a PS/2 adapter
on an Asus A7A mo
[Matt Kraai]
> There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
> helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
> Could someone please create this, or point me in the right
> direction?
Not quite the same, but I use
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?[EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:52:15PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
> helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
> Could someone please create this, or point me in the right
> direction?
>
> Matt
>
> 1. http://bugs.q
Howdy,
There is a nice page of bugs in the base system[1]. It would be
helpful to have a similar page for the bugs in debian-installer.
Could someone please create this, or point me in the right
direction?
Matt
1. http://bugs.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/base.cgi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 177346 wishlist
Bug#177346: main-menu: useless question when only one option is available
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> severity 177445 wishlist
Bug#177445: useless question asked when only one option is available
Severity set to `wishlist'.
severity 177346 wishlist
severity 177445 wishlist
thanks
sön 2003-01-19 klockan 01.06 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen:
> When installing, and only one package satisfy a required virtual
> package, a question with only one alternative is presented. In the
> cases where only one package is listed, the qu
clone 177346 -1
reassign -1 anna
retitle -1 useless question asked when only one option is available
thanks
The first question is asked by anna, not main-menu.
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 177346 -1
Bug#177346: main-menu: useless question when only one option is available
Bug 177346 cloned as bug 177445.
> reassign -1 anna
Bug#177445: main-menu: useless question when only one option is available
Bug reassigned from package `main-me
[Rob Bradford]
>> Perhaps it would be an idea to add 'grub' to the build depend list,
>> to make it more obvious that this package require grub to be
>> usefull? Or perhaps just make it architecture independant, as
>> there is nothing in the package making stopping it from running on
>> any arch a
sön 2003-01-19 klockan 16.11 skrev Rob Bradford:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:54:54AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would be an idea to add 'grub' to the build depend list, to
> > make it more obvious that this package require grub to be usefull? Or
> > perhaps just make it a
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:54:54AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps it would be an idea to add 'grub' to the build depend list, to
> make it more obvious that this package require grub to be usefull? Or
> perhaps just make it architecture independant, as there is nothing in
> the packa
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:17:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177061: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177162: fixed in anna 0.021
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Accepted:
libdebian-installer3-dev_0.11_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer3-dev_0.11_i386.deb
libdebian-installer3_0.11_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer3_0.11_i386.deb
libdebian-installer_0.11.dsc
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-i
Accepted:
anna_0.021.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.021.dsc
anna_0.021.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.021.tar.gz
anna_0.021_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.021_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 177162
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBS
Hello
I noticed your CVS commit of kbd-chooser, and tried to build it in my
Sid chroot. If failed because yacc and lex was missing. I installed
bison and flex to fix it. You should update build-deps to reflect
this.
Now the build stops with this error message:
cc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-poi
Have been trying to install Debian Woody 3.0 at least 10 times but
unsuccessful. Cannot get either xwindows (have an i810 video card) or
sound to work. It recognizes the cards but video/sound will not work.
Have tried every way of installing possible, but no luck. Odd part is:
I have installed
Hi,
as a related note: updated mips boot-floppies are available at:
http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/linux-mips/install/
I checked them myself and had success reports from others using them.
Would be nice to see them in R2. Anything I can do to help with that?
Regards,
-- Guido
msg25290/pgp0
#include
* Christian T. Steigies [Sun, Jan 19 2003, 12:47:22AM]:
> I've (re)built boot-floppies for m68k a few days ago and finally managed to
> test them on my Amiga. Installation went fine. One thing I noticed, the
> installer downloaded mac-fdisk, on an Amiga, is this necessary?
Fine ("kreuzm
39 matches
Mail list logo
