Dear friends , welcome to china!www.acweb.com
>>>
have you ever heard of China?
have you ever been to China?
have you some Chinese friends?
do you want to work in China?
do you want to teach Chinese students learning English?
<
Hi,
I'm working on the keyboard installer, and have been reviewing bug
#47913, and its brought up an issue:
During install, we select early on
(1) a language
(2) a keyboard (for the installer, at least).
We install the appropriate keyboard, and console font, and continue.
We
Repository: debian-installer/tools/cdrom-detect/debian
who:pere
time: Mon Dec 9 15:33:49 MST 2002
Log Message:
Set priority to low for debconf questions asking if missing kernel
module should be loaded from floppy, and question letting the user
know that a working CD was found.
tags 161998 + pending
quit
Hi,
as explained by Martin, your l10n fixes have already been committed.
About the last issue, it is not related to l10n, and AFAICT there
have been no other similar reports.
This bugreport will be closed when a new boot-floppies package is
uploaded. If you encounter t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 152152 important
Bug#152152: boot-floppies: bf2.4 kernel may need an (security) update
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 161998 + pending
Bug#161998: boot-floppies: wrong fr translations
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
#include
* Adam DiCarlo [Mon, Dec 09 2002, 12:42:01AM]:
> > I've asked here twice for a new release of the (woody) boot-floppies, since
> > they fix a problem which is present in the current m68k version. It would be
> > nice, if this could be released before 3.0.1 is made. Unless we sneak in the
Repository: debian-installer/tools/cdrom-detect/debian
who:pere
time: Mon Dec 9 14:52:40 MST 2002
Log Message:
Log the detected distribution.
Files:
changed:changelog postinst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Your message dated Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:45:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line media problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 167240 + wontfix
Bug#167240: BF2.4 installer kernel should NOT use VGA16 FB by default.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> severity 170764 normal
Bug#170764: Package: boot-floppies says 'unknown IDE controller'
Severity set to `normal'.
Automatic build of busybox-cvs_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1 on poseidon by sbuild/m68k 1.170
| Build started at 20021209-1329
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2.1.18)
[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 156704 + help
Bug#156704: arm riscpc doesn't work at all
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-2_i386.udeb: priority is overridden from extra to
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correc
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20021209-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20021209-2_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-2_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-2_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs_0.60.99.cvs20021209-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 161999 important
Bug#161999: boot-floppies: 3.0r0 install can end with no /etc/host{s,name}
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 161999 + unproducible morehinfo
Unknown tag/s: unproducible, morehinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unre
by sbuild/m68k 1.170
| Build started at 20021209-1329
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2.1.18)
[...]
| make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/busybox-
Your message dated Mon, 09 Dec 2002 14:17:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#172302: fixed in busybox-cvs 0.60.99.cvs20021209-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is it packaged anywhere now?
> >
> > Yes, install-doc.
>
> Are you talking CVS version? As far as I look into debian archive, I
> see install-doc as a part of boot-floppies source tree and install-doc
> is only a binary package name. (I think Josip i
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1_i386.udeb
busybox-cvs_0.60.99.cvs20021209-
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20021209-1_i386.udeb: priority is overridden from extra to
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correc
Boot-floppies source pkg is 3.0.22 in woody, tno the stuff in
dists/woody/main/disks-i386/ is 3.0.23. This should be fixed,
dragging the 3.0.23 source pkg into stable.
We should have a 3.0.24 available in the not too distant future -- not
sure if we'll have it in time... Given delays in recompi
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > If anyone has any objections to this (I can't imaging why) let me
> > know. Otherwise I'll forward boot-floppies and debian-installer
> > messages to their corresponding PTS source pkg addresses.
>
> Hmm, would that have all of debia
Repository: base-config
who:joeyh
time: Mon Dec 9 12:06:55 MST 2002
Log Message:
* Make termwrap use dpkg --print-installation-architecture instead of
requiring HOSTTYPE be passed from the first-stage installer.
* If base-config is passed "new" as $1, enter new insta
Repository: base-config/debian
who:joeyh
time: Mon Dec 9 12:06:55 MST 2002
Log Message:
* Make termwrap use dpkg --print-installation-architecture instead of
requiring HOSTTYPE be passed from the first-stage installer.
* If base-config is passed "new" as $1, enter ne
Repository: debian-installer/tools/prebaseconfig
who:joeyh
time: Mon Dec 9 12:00:56 MST 2002
Log Message:
pass "new" to base-config, this makes it use full new install mode even if
debootstrap_settings is (later) not created
Files:
changed:inittab.install
--
To UNSUBSC
* Mario Lang
| I noticed that the time you have to start typing something is
| quite short, and, it would really be helpful if we could get a single
| beep at that point.
Sure. I guess it should stop there once we release, but that's
annoying when you are trying to test and boot a lot.
| Does
Repository: debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src
who:sjogren
time: Mon Dec 9 10:32:28 MST 2002
Log Message:
assign to the commandf variable
Files:
changed:debconfclient.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Repository: debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/modules/frontend/text
who:sjogren
time: Mon Dec 9 10:31:36 MST 2002
Log Message:
Move the percentage counter to the beginning of the line
Files:
changed:text.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> If anyone has any objections to this (I can't imaging why) let me
> know. Otherwise I'll forward boot-floppies and debian-installer
> messages to their corresponding PTS source pkg addresses.
Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], o
submitter 172356 !
clone 172302 -1 -2
reassign -1 busybox-udeb
retitle -1 busybox-udeb needs to be priority important
severity -1 important
submitter -1 !
reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
retitle -2 busybox-udeb needs to be priority important
severity -2 important
submitter -2 !
thanks
On Mon, Dec 09, 2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 172356 !
Bug#172356: busybox-cvs-udeb needs to be priority extra
Changed Bug submitter.
> clone 172302 -1 -2
Bug#172302: busybox-cvs: should not be priority standard, nor provide busybox
Bug 172302 cloned as bugs 172378-172379.
> reassign -1
I'm going to cc debian-boot on this, in the hopes that someone who has
made more udebs than I can help out.
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:48:14PM +0100, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have some time to help you now, since I'm mostly done with my grad
> >
Hi.
Today I tried the
Linux BRLTTY_BRAILLE_DRIVER=ts
method of specifying a braille display model with the d-i CDROM installer.
I noticed that the time you have to start typing something is
quite short, and, it would really be helpful if we could get a single
beep at that point.
Does anyone o
clone 172302 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 busybox-cvs-udeb needs to be priority extra
severity -1 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:43:24AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Busybox-cvs should not be priority standard, since it is then
> downloaded as part of the normal d-i ins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 172302 -1
Bug#172302: busybox-cvs: should not be priority standard, nor provide busybox
Bug 172302 cloned as bug 172356.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#172356: busybox-cvs: should not be priority standard, nor provide busybox
Bug reassigned fro
Repository: debian-installer/utils/debian/po
who:ender
time: Mon Dec 9 08:04:05 MST 2002
Log Message:
Starting translation...
Files:
changed:es.po
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:56:36PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Bernhard R. Link wrote on Mon Dec 09, 2002 um 11:44:28AM:
>
> > This design decision could exclude the segment between desktops and
> > embedded things, where the only ways out are are serial-cards (and
> > maybe some othe
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > Do you intend to add faq such as webwml/security/faq.wml inside
> > ddp/manuals.sgml/faq ?
> >
> > More generaly each faq include in the webwml module ?
>
> That's 1
#include
Bernhard R. Link wrote on Mon Dec 09, 2002 um 11:44:28AM:
> This design decision could exclude the segment between desktops and
> embedded things, where the only ways out are are serial-cards (and
> maybe some other things, for which getting a initial console would be
> even harder).
Ma
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Do you intend to add faq such as webwml/security/faq.wml inside
> ddp/manuals.sgml/faq ?
>
> More generaly each faq include in the webwml module ?
That's 1) another module 2) another format. I don't know, but that looks
like it's
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail
in error, please notify the EPA postma
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021209 11:07]:
> It would be the best practice for us. Some strange multi-serial-port card is
> generally not essential for the installation, but missing some important
> device node of a harddisk is. Look at the current situation with /dev/i2o/hdX
> devices, we
#include
Bernhard R. Link wrote on Mon Dec 09, 2002 um 10:56:39AM:
> devfs also seem to have some problems with some drivers. I remember a
> situation in the local lug here, where a multi-serial-card did not
> want to run together with devfs, even after some changes to the module's
> source.
>
>
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:15:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
[...]
> What I would suggest doing as an alternative is to create a
> 'common-deb-data' CVS module, and via the CVS modules functionality,
> including this module with the various CVS modules that use it, e.g.,
> the FAQ etc. Th
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021208 22:48]:
> we discuss about devfs or not devfs in the installed system.
> we currently map any devfs path to the non devfs variant. the count of
> map definitions will grow if we want to support more special hardware.
> so the question is, why won't we use
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:20:39PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (install-doc perhaps? Last I checked, install-doc was entirely
> > broken. :)
>
> Broken how? I don't see any serious bugs on that pkg. Doesn't seem
> broken to me.
There's one that's tag
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:20:39PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > If in the DDP CVS area, should it be packaged as well? I
> > > > > think it will need to be...
> > > >
> > > > It can be packaged from there too, I don't see how that would
> > > > ne
Repository: debian-installer/tools/autopartkit/debian
who:pere
time: Mon Dec 9 02:27:30 MST 2002
Log Message:
Make this package compile with both libparted 1.4 and 1.6.
Files:
changed:control changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
48 matches
Mail list logo
