On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:44:03 -0700
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was no response to this request on the debian-powerpc list, I
> guess it really belongs to debian-boot (cc'd).
>
> Since the consensus is that the current prep and chrp kernels which
> we supply as part of boot
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:23:51AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:06:56PM +0300, George Karaolides wrote:
> > >
> > > Further to my previous post about the serial port slowing down during
> > > booting, here are the interrupts. It took an hour and a half to get to
Hello all.
I finally got back from my weekend trip out of town, and finally got
the mess my cats made cleaned up.
Attached is a patch for cdebconf that adds a gtk2.0 frontend. It is
relatively complete. The select and text handlers are not finished,
but there is enough to be tested here. I was
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer/debian
who:sjogren
time: Tue Sep 3 12:52:51 MDT 2002
Log Message:
Name changes: libd-i -> libd-i1, libd-i-dev -> libd-i1-dev.
Changed SONAME to libd-i.so.1
Files:
changed:changelog control rules
removed:libdebian-inst
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer
who:sjogren
time: Tue Sep 3 12:52:51 MDT 2002
Log Message:
Name changes: libd-i -> libd-i1, libd-i-dev -> libd-i1-dev.
Changed SONAME to libd-i.so.1
Files:
changed:Makefile
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:47:22PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2002 16:48:05 +0200
>
> >
> > I've added the build-dep, but I don't get a versioned binary depend.
> >
> > Hmm. Come to think of it, why doesn't libd-i have the SONAME in the
> > package name?
>
> Yes, this is a very
On 02 Sep 2002 16:48:05 +0200
>
> I've added the build-dep, but I don't get a versioned binary depend.
>
> Hmm. Come to think of it, why doesn't libd-i have the SONAME in the
> package name?
Yes, this is a very badly packaged shared library.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo