Manuel Clos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Hi all,
>
> where should I get the basedebs.tar that the netinst CD ask for when I
> select "Install Base System" ?
The current situation is that you are supposed to roll your own
using debootstrap.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL
³×¶¼·ç¸¶´Ï °í°´°¨»ç À̺¥Æ®!!~~.
2002³â1¿ù10ÀϺÎÅÍ~
ÀúÈñ ³×¶¼·ç¸¶´Ï ½ÅûÀÚ ¸ðµÎ¿¡°Ô ¶Ç´Ù¸¥ À̺¥Æ® Çà»ç¸¦ ¸¶·Ã ÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.
A¼¼Æ®+2Æ÷+ÄíÆù1Àå, B¼¼Æ®+4Æ÷+ÄíÆù2Àå, C¼¼Æ®+10Æ÷+ÄíÆù6Àå
ÄíÆùÀ»10Àå ¸ð¾Æ¼ ÀúÈñ¿¡°Ô º¸³» Áֽøé A¼¼Æ® 1¹Ú½º¸¦ ¹«·á·Î º¸³» µå¸®°í ÀÖÀ¸´Ï ¸¹ÀÌ Âü¿© ÇϽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù
Hi all,
where should I get the basedebs.tar that the netinst CD ask for when I
select "Install Base System" ?
Thanks.
--
Manuel Clos
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Si no puedes hacerlo bien, hazlo bonito (Bill Gates)
* If you can't do it well, do it nice (Bill Gates)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:48:15AM +0200, George Papamichelakis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have managed to install woody on a system that uses
> the above adaptec card. I had at first to use a minimum
> potato installation on a separate disk and then upgrade
> to woody, install a 2.4 kernel and then u
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:57:18 +0100 (CET)
"Jerome Petazzoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [talking about dhcp server packages...]
> > Now, I would have liked to upload my experimental packages for the
3.x> > series a long time ago (October 5, 2001 that was when DHCP ISC
3.0 was> > released.) Th
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:38:40PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:06:17AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > I object. We should fix, rather than disable, it. Could you
> > please try the following code instead?
> Sorry, I won't have access to the s390 systems until Monday so
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:56:00AM +0100, Manuel Quesada wrote:
> > Maybe the installer is trying to mount /dev/hda, which would be a
> > standard type disk on a newWorld. Try switching to virtual console 2,
> > or use the Execute a Shell menu command, to enter
> >
> > mac-fdisk /dev/sda
> >
> > A
#include
Herbert Xu wrote on Fri Jan 25, 2002 um 08:42:47AM:
> > kernel-image-2.4.x series for unuseable for most people. YOU KNOW THIS.
> > Manoj tries to do the best job - he often fixed the bugs quickly when I
> > reported something (and you often ignored this fixes).
>
> More FUD.
I know,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:55:50PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > > > A 2.4 kernel is only an apt-get install away so this has no place when
> > >
> > > Blah. You should know better than me that this is not true.
> >
> > Please give details.
>
> Please? You have to a) install, b) change fstab
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:42:29PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Not providing an Ext3 option as-default would damage Debian's reputation.
If we are worried about reputations, the best thing to do is to get a
release out the door with updated versions of common user packages. Users
who want a re
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/po
who:peterk
time: tor jan 24 22:15:33 CET 2002
Log Message:
Translation updates.
Files:
changed:sv.po
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include
Herbert Xu wrote on Fri Jan 25, 2002 um 07:25:13AM:
> > - This are patches
> > - ide patched kernel is reported to hang on some new chipsets while IDE
> >detection
>
> Please give specific details rather than vague recollections.
Both people were newbies - and how should a newbi
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 07:25:13AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > IMHO reiserfs simply isn't viable anymore. So I don't really care
please explain - how is it ``not viable anymore''? replaced by ext3? the
only thing ext3 has is journalling. reiserfs brings a lot more to the
table than sim
Hi there,
I do have a problem installing Debian 2.2r4 on my Asus A7V 133 - U-ATA 100
by Promise onboard Chip (my guess is that the problem is caused by this fellow).
I downloaded the installation/rescue discs from Debian, they are booting but the
installation routine cannot find my harddi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:42:29PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > Without initrd, you can include only so many hardware drivers. And for all
> > of the important drivers that I can think of (such as NetGear FA311TX,
> > AICRAID, Promise Ultra IDE etc.), the support is already in at least one of
#include
Herbert Xu wrote on Thu Jan 24, 2002 um 07:59:52PM:
> > So are these an official part of boot-floppies? Should they be being
> > (co?)maintained by Herbert to keep them in sync with the other kernels?
No. I allow to update the package and NMU if I do not respond for >=2
days, but Herbe
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:42:31PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I found out that debootstrap 0.1.16 uses mkfifo on its
> scripts (/usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/{woody,sid})
> but it is not available on the boof-floppies' system
>
> I worked it around using mknod $i p, I didn't file
> a bu
Repository: debian-installer/doc
who:tfheen
time: Thu Jan 24 10:51:27 PST 2002
Log Message:
Update URL to UPX.
Files:
changed:README
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[cc me on replies]
Hello friends!
I found out that debootstrap 0.1.16 uses mkfifo on its
scripts (/usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/{woody,sid})
but it is not available on the boof-floppies' system
I worked it around using mknod $i p, I didn't file
a bug on it, do what you think that it is needed
[
[talking about dhcp server packages...]
> Now, I would have liked to upload my experimental packages for the 3.x
> series a long time ago (October 5, 2001 that was when DHCP ISC 3.0 was
> released.) The problem is that the boot floppies are using the DHCP
> client from the 2.x series. The client
Repository: boot-floppies/s390-specials
who:sgybas
time: Thu Jan 24 09:38:54 PST 2002
Log Message:
Fixed parsing of dbootstrap return code
Files:
changed:root.profile
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:06:17AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> I object. We should fix, rather than disable, it. Could you
> please try the following code instead?
Sorry, I won't have access to the s390 systems until Monday so I
can't do this now. I have uploaded the NMU for i386 and s390 to
in
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:36:37PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems.
>
> Testing with current CVS boot-floppies on s390 shows that this section
> does not work. It causes
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> if [ -n "$USE_BOOTFLOPPIES_INTERACTION" ]; then
^^
Sorry, this must be -z, of course.
--
Stefan Gybas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:56:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The "auto" line probably shouldn't appear for PCMCIA cards. (auto means
> "configure this interface at bootup", whereas PCMCIA cards are only
> configured when the card's inserted)
Thanks for pointing that out. Could someone please
Hello,
I have managed to install woody on a system that uses
the above adaptec card. I had at first to use a minimum
potato installation on a separate disk and then upgrade
to woody, install a 2.4 kernel and then use the dpt_i2o
module to see the raid disk. A friend of mine wishes
to use the same
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:36:37PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems.
Testing with current CVS boot-floppies on s390 shows that this section
does not work. It causes dbootstrap to hang after calling debootstrap
(maybe because the cat proce
Repository: boot-floppies/scripts/rootdisk
who:sgybas
time: Thu Jan 24 05:19:54 PST 2002
Log Message:
s390 uses devfs, doesn't need devices.tar.gz
Files:
changed:SMALL_REMOVE_LIST_s390
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:17:11PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
> Umm. Why not teach debootstrap to use mknod instead?
> There is no good reason for debootstrap to need mkfifo,
I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems.
--
Stefan Gybas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:59:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I would be happy to do so if someone can show me why we really need 2.4
> boot floppies on i386. So far, the only reasons I've seen are:
[...]
4. Better network card autodetection support
Its network card was an ISA NE2000 clone. Us
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 127546
Bug#127546: boot-floppies: please, please, please include a pointer to basedebs/disks
somewhere
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 127546 boot-floppies
Bug#127546: boot-floppies: please, please, please include a pointer to
Title: ¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚÀÇ ±æ
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?
21¼¼±â »õ·Î¿î ±âȸ°¡ ´ç½Å¿¡°Ô ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù...
°æÁ¦ÀûÀÚÀ¯¿Í ½Ã°£ÀûÀÚÀ¯¸¦ ¿øÇϽʴϱî?´ç½ÅÀ»
¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚ·Î ¸¸µé¾î µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ÇÑǬ¾øÀÌ µ·¹ö´Â ¹æ¹ý. °¡Àå »¡¸® ºÎÀÚ°¡ µÇ´Â
¹æ¹ý. ´ç½ÅÀº ¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚÀÇ ±æÀ» °ÉÀ¸½Ã°Ú½À´Ï±î?¾Æ·¡ »çÀÌÆ®¿¡ ±×ÇØ´äÀÌ
ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù...
http://millionaire.kr.kg/
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> kernel-image-2.4.17-bf2.4
>> pcmcia-modules-2.4.17-bf2.4
> So are these an official part of boot-floppies? Should they be being
> (co?)maintained by Herbert to keep them in sync with the other kernels?
I would be happy to do so if someone can show
33 matches
Mail list logo
