On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:21:20PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> These are some notes as I attempted to install the woody b-f.
>
> After selecting Partition a Hard Disk, an alert advised about there
> being no need for a boot partition and "... and the root partition
> must be on the first disk".
These are some notes as I attempted to install the woody b-f.
After selecting Partition a Hard Disk, an alert advised about there
being no need for a boot partition and "... and the root partition
must be on the first disk". I have had Debian installed on this
machine before, on the second extern
> Mailx does meet the criteria for important very well though.
>
> Is there no way to have a package be priority important and skipped by
> tasksel?
How about if we change the semantics of the -r and -i flags of tasksel
so that it only marks a package for install if it doesn't conflict with
a p
Anthony Towns wrote:
> (-testing cc dropped)
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:57:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > and setting my proxy worked pretty well. There are a few things that are
> > > standard that probably shouldn't be: gcc-3.0, nfs-kernel-server, xlib6g,
> > > the debconf/stool stuff,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> It's priority important, and other important packages depend on it, in
> particular mailx and at. I guess all three of those could be dropped to
> standard reasonably. Maybe. ?
Mailx does meet the criteria for important very well though.
Is there no way to have a package b
Installing:
bf-images-1.44_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz byhand
bf-archive-install_2.3.6_arm.sh byhand
bf-doc_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz byhand
bf-riscpc_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz byhand
install-doc_2.3.6_arm.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/install-doc_2.3.6_arm.deb
bf-netwinder_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz byhand
bf-misc_2.3.6_arm.tar.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:38:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> > man-db would be a good one, otherwise users never get the opertunity
> > to turn on caching.
>
> Man-db is another one that any sane use of tasksel or dselect will pull
> in automatically, so I don't think debo
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 08:10:47AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Ron Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010624 07:52]:
> > I didn't realize that getting Debian onto this iBook would be so
> > difficult. I hope someone on this list has some clues to help
> > me. First I have to ask if anyone knows of
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 03:57:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> in the next boot-floppies rev, they were using mismatched names for
> passing the info.
fixed in CVS.
> > The end result was 234MB used, which dropped to 174MB used when I ran apt-get
> > clean.
>
> Which I have just added to base-con
* Ron Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010624 07:52]:
> I didn't realize that getting Debian onto this iBook would be so
> difficult. I hope someone on this list has some clues to help
> me. First I have to ask if anyone knows of anyone installing Debian on
> one of these things?
It sounds to me like
boot-floppies_2.3.6_arm.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
bf-archive-install_2.3.6_arm.sh
bf-cats_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz
bf-doc_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz
bf-images-1.44_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz
bf-misc_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz
bf-netwinder_2.3.6_arm.tar.gz
bf-riscpc_2.3.6
Anthony Towns wrote:
> base-config didn't keep what I told it
You mean what you told dbootstrap, I take it. I think this will be fixed
in the next boot-floppies rev, they were using mismatched names for
passing the info.
> base-config also seemed to be a little confused about my proxy settings.
Repository: base-config/debian
who:joeyh
time: Sun Jun 24 12:56:14 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* German translation from Ronald Lembcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* 75apt-get now runs apt-get clean after installing everything
unless the inst
Repository: base-config/lib
who:joeyh
time: Sun Jun 24 12:56:14 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* German translation from Ronald Lembcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* 75apt-get now runs apt-get clean after installing everything
unless the install
Richard Hirst wrote:
> perl-base 5.6.1-3
>
> Installer doesn't prompt for root password, and doesn't offer to
> create a normal user. Instead, I get
>
> at /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/Getopt/Long.pm line 42
> Can't locate auto/Getopt/Long/Configure.al in @INC (@INC contains:
>/usr/local/lib/pe
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 02:48:48PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> I'm wondering why it was added to base. I understand it's
> priority standard and the default debian MTA, but...
It's priority important, and other important packages depend on it, in
particular mailx and at. I guess all three of
Ethan Benson wrote:
> man-db would be a good one, otherwise users never get the opertunity
> to turn on caching.
Man-db is another one that any sane use of tasksel or dselect will pull
in automatically, so I don't think debootstrap need bother with
downloading it.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUB
INSTALL REPORT
(NOTE! Woody boot-floppies are *not* for the faint hearted!)
Boot-Floppies: 2.3.6 (2001-06-21)
Architecture: i386, idepci flavour
Method: floppy install with rescue, root, drivers;
net install (ftp.planetmirror.com.au; proxied) for base and standard
Machine: ACER TravelMa
Hello,
I just translated the dbootstrap messages into Korean. The file is at
http://people.debian.org/~cwryu/dbootstrap.ko.po .
The CVS repository seems to be open to any Debian developers (which
have account on cvs.d.o). Is it permitted for myself to commit the
translation files and update it
Hello.
I've received a bug report requesting /boot to be made root.root and
mode 755 in base-files. This is currently root.disk and mode 2775.
Does anybody remember the reason for the current permissions?
(If not, I'll change them as suggested).
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is on hppa, perl-modules is not part of base.
>
>base-config1.08
>perl-base 5.6.1-3
[...]
> at /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/Getopt/Long.pm line 42
>Can't locate auto/Getopt/Long/Configure.al in @INC (@INC contains:
>/usr/local/lib/perl/5.6.1 /usr/lo
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 07:37:59AM +0100, Jone Silva da Costa wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Could you please tell me if it is possible to find somewhere a Linux version for the
>Motorola 88k processor's serie?
Linux for 88k does not exist. I have run one of *BSD on one, OpenBSD, maybe.
Richard
--
T
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 12:26:06AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> the remaining problems are:
one other thing, dhcp/bootp network configuration failed, i have only
a bootp server which works fine for netbooting this machine, and
potato boot-floppies liked it fine for network configuration (even
I just did a boot-floppies build with todays CVS, built against
busybox 0.51-9 (-8 is broken) and debootstrap 0.1.13.
the install went pretty much perfectly, all the permissions problems
are gone now, debootstrap no longer fails to mount proc.
base-config went well, no problems there, excep
24 matches
Mail list logo
