Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 04:28:45AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > > Since level 1 is installed before level 2, B which is level 1 will be > > installed automatically before C (which is level 2). There is no more > > distinction needed. > > What happens if thereafter, you want to install a l

cvs commit to tasksel/tasks by ajt

2001-05-21 Thread ajt
Repository: tasksel/tasks who:ajt time: Mon May 21 22:51:32 PDT 2001 Log Message: fix some Packages lines with gumph on them (trailing ,'s, versions) Files: changed:chinese-s chinese-t japanese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:36:17PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:20:25PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > > Ok, im starting to see its advantages now. (i think) > > > > Are all the the different dependency types (pre-depends, depends, > > conflicts, replaces, provides) r

Bug#96906: Debian installer 96906 is a real bug after all

2001-05-21 Thread Dan Shearer
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12 May 2001 13:18:04 -0400: > I cannot reproduce this. Nor can any of my friends. We have done > many network installs. > Closing this bug, it's very wrong. I disagree. I have replicated this on my system, and it is a major pain. Using 2.2.19pre17 re

Re: Bug#98075: Update inst-methods.sgml, add suntar, hfs; update setlang sections

2001-05-21 Thread Chris Tillman
I figured out the reason Disk Copy grayed out Make A Floppy when I was trying it out, was the machine i was trying it on doesn't have a floppy drive. So, here's my edited version for the Writing Disk Images From MacOS section of the patch, using root.bin as an example. -- To create a flopp

cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/po by manty

2001-05-21 Thread manty
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/po who:manty time: Mon May 21 16:40:06 PDT 2001 Log Message: Updated galician translation. Files: changed:gl.po -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

cvs commit to boot-floppies by aph

2001-05-21 Thread aph
Repository: boot-floppies who:aph time: Mon May 21 16:33:04 PDT 2001 Log Message: add powermac booting notes -- much work to be done here. Thanks to Ethan Benson in formulating this Files: changed:todo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: Some comments on 2001-05-17 boot-floppies

2001-05-21 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 03:11:07PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote: > 1) I used the 'idepci' flavour, hoping it would have a good set of > network drivers in its kernel so I wouldn't have to install from > floppies. Unfortunately it lacks a driver for the rtl8139. > These cards

cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk by kraai

2001-05-21 Thread kraai
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk who:kraai time: Mon May 21 13:53:19 PDT 2001 Log Message: Fix BSD disklabel partition numbering in 2.2 kernels. Files: changed:partbl_msdos.c -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Some comments on 2001-05-17 boot-floppies

2001-05-21 Thread David Huggins-Daines
Hi, I had some spare disk space and time on a machine here and thought I'd try out the latest round of woody boot-floppies (congratulations to the boot-floppies team for getting a set out for testing so early, by the way). Here are a few things I noticed right away, apologies if they've already

Bug#98282: boot-floppies: The graphical install does not support /dev/ida/c0d0* devices

2001-05-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:41:47AM -0700, John D. Rowell wrote: > Package: boot-floppies > Version: 20010521 > Severity: normal > > When installing Progeny on a machine that only has a raid controller > (i.e. /dev/ida/c0d0* devices), the partitioner does not show any > optio

Bug#98282: boot-floppies: The graphical install does not support /dev/ida/c0d0* devices

2001-05-21 Thread John D . Rowell
Package: boot-floppies Version: 20010521 Severity: normal When installing Progeny on a machine that only has a raid controller (i.e. /dev/ida/c0d0* devices), the partitioner does not show any options, and thus setup is impossible. Many high-to-end servers fall into this category, including the

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:28:49PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > Thierry Laronde wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:20:25PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > > > Ok, im starting to see its advantages now. (i think) > > > > > > Are all the the different dependency types (pre-depends, depends, >

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Glenn McGrath
Thierry Laronde wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:20:25PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > > Ok, im starting to see its advantages now. (i think) > > > > Are all the the different dependency types (pre-depends, depends, > > conflicts, replaces, provides) represented in the one tree ? > > In thi

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:20:25PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > Ok, im starting to see its advantages now. (i think) > > Are all the the different dependency types (pre-depends, depends, > conflicts, replaces, provides) represented in the one tree ? In this system, if I'm not mistaken, there ar

Bug#98075: Update inst-methods.sgml, add suntar, hfs; update setlang sections

2001-05-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > We *can* help each other without being overly negative. then send proposed patches to the list asking whether they look fine before asking that they be merged. > Here's the description: > > > you must set the file type and cre

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Glenn McGrath
Ok, im starting to see its advantages now. (i think) Are all the the different dependency types (pre-depends, depends, conflicts, replaces, provides) represented in the one tree ? I can see how it would work with just dependencies, if package C depends on package B and pre-depends on package A

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:33:29PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: > Thierry Laronde wrote: > > > > > > So the Level is computed _at build time_. A package depending on packages > > that can be built (they depend on packages which Level can not be computed) > > can not be built. > > Im not sure i u

Re: [RFC] managing dependencies with levels

2001-05-21 Thread Glenn McGrath
Thierry Laronde wrote: > > > So the Level is computed _at build time_. A package depending on packages > that can be built (they depend on packages which Level can not be computed) > can not be built. Im not sure i understand exactly your idea, but if the levels are worked out at build time, th