Bug # 84830 duplicates bug # 83049.
Chinook Software
US Distributors of SpEd, *the* Stored Procedure Editor
Chris Tillman, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.speditor.com/default.asp?sig
5150 E. Riverhouse Road, Suite E
Tucson, AZ 85718
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
>The installation procedure does not allow you to install the kernel from the
>rescue disk, and drivers from the harddisk, for example.
>
>In many cases, it is easiest to only have two disks to boot and have
>everything
>else on the drive beforehand, rather than even more diskettes.
>
>
This has
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/po
who:porridge
time: Fri Mar 23 07:11:43 PST 2001
Log Message:
update
Files:
changed:pl.po
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 87191 ftp.debian.org
Bug#87191: base: package modutils_2.3.11-13_i386 in pool is incorrect
Bug reassigned from package `base' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 87191 important
Bug#87191: base: package modutils_2.3.11-13_i386 in pool is incorrec
reassign 87191 ftp.debian.org
# downgraded from grave
severity 87191 important
thanks
modutils | 2.3.11-10 | proposed-updates | sparc
modutils | 2.3.11-13 | proposed-updates | i386
modutils | 2.3.11-13.1 |stable | alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
Since the Packages file f
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation/pl
who:porridge
time: Fri Mar 23 06:11:28 PST 2001
Log Message:
bumped revisions - change to ide from udma66
Files:
changed:inst-methods.sgml rescue-boot.sgml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation
who:porridge
time: Fri Mar 23 06:11:28 PST 2001
Log Message:
bumped revisions - change to ide from udma66
Files:
changed:release-notes.pl.sgml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:34:38PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Has anybody some experience with the possibility of using compressed files
> > on the fly with ext2 or iso9660 ?
>
> If it's readonly, why not try cramfs?
If it's the same principle (w
Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody some experience with the possibility of using compressed files
> on the fly with ext2 or iso9660 ?
If it's readonly, why not try cramfs?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROT
Hello,
Has anybody some experience with the possibility of using compressed files
on the fly with ext2 or iso9660 ?
Files compressed individually will take, in general I think, more space than
a whole file system compressed (initrd at boot time typically).
But, for machines with not a great amo
10 matches
Mail list logo