Re: udma disks /modules/2.2.17/ should be modules/2.2.17-ide/

Randolph Chung wrote: > > In reference to a message from bug1, dated Aug 17: > > the udma disks spew up heaps of modprobe errors, cant open dependencies > > file /lib/modules/2.2.17-ide/modules.dep > > > > the directory created is /lib/modules/2.2.17/ > > > > This is pretty serious, stops modules

Re: udma disks /modules/2.2.17/ should be modules/2.2.17-ide/

In reference to a message from bug1, dated Aug 17: > the udma disks spew up heaps of modprobe errors, cant open dependencies > file /lib/modules/2.2.17-ide/modules.dep > > the directory created is /lib/modules/2.2.17/ > > This is pretty serious, stops modules being configured are you using resc

Bugs against release notes?

I noticed a typo in section 7.15.1 of the PowerPC release notes for 2.2 at . Where is the correct place to file a bug? I don't see an appropriate pseudo-package at . -- - m

Bug#67771: modconf or not?

Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Didn't I say whiptail? Why are you reassigning it to modconf? Sorry, brain fart. > Please investigate the problem instead of reassigning blindly. Sometimes I just refile w/o investigating but its better for me to process 20 bugs and have a little i

Processed: Re: Bug#67771: modconf or not?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 67771 boot-floppies Bug#67771: Modconf fails to start Bug reassigned from package `modconf' to `boot-floppies'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#67771: modconf or not?

reassign 67771 boot-floppies thanks Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > thanks > > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > So, uh, modconf is utterly broken on potato boot floppies? > > > i386 only? Does the new whiptail fix it? > > > No. > > > > It's whiptail some

Processed: Re: Bug#67771: modconf or not?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 67771 modconf Bug#67771: Modconf fails to start Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `modconf'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#67771: modconf or not?

reassign 67771 modconf thanks Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > So, uh, modconf is utterly broken on potato boot floppies? > > i386 only? Does the new whiptail fix it? > No. > > It's whiptail somehow. Ah. This is not a bf bug. Reassigned. > modconf+whi

Re: potato release notes missing

On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:44:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Actually, no, this is not in webwml, because the file is built differently > > for different architectures, and it'd be a bit harder to maintain if it was > > in wml. > > You don't unde