Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 64371 normal
Bug#64371: Smart Array RAID Compaq do not see at boot
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 64371 normal
Bug#64371: Smart Array RAID Compaq do not see at boot
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 51574 fixed
Bug#51574: hardware o
# RC bugs
#64371: Smart Array RAID Compaq do not see at boot; 44 days old
severity 64371 normal
#64823: incorrect LILO automatic placement on i386; 35 days old
severity 64371 normal
#65515: boot-floppies: update-modules requires /bin/bash; 20 days old
# will be fixed with upcoming b-f releas
> Speaking of modprobe...
>
> Is the "Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.2.15/modules.dep" warning still present in modconf? If
> so, perhaps we should work around it; it's annoying.
I didn't see it when i did the install this morning.
randolph
--
Debian Developer <[
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 02:27:33PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Randolph Chung wrote:
> > i was unable to pin this down, but it is indeed quite harmless if a bit
> > annoying to the end user. This happens BEFORE init is run. I think Matt's
> > explanation of unix.o is close (you do not get this messa
Randolph Chung wrote:
> i was unable to pin this down, but it is indeed quite harmless if a bit
> annoying to the end user. This happens BEFORE init is run. I think Matt's
> explanation of unix.o is close (you do not get this message if you are using
> the idepci/compact flavors, which have unix.o
ok, some good news and some good news ...
> I am rather concerned about the modprobe reports posted to the list earlier.
>[ the gist of it is this message, on startup: ]
>modprobe: modprobe: Can't open dependencies file /lib/modules/2.2.17/modules.dep
>(No such file or directory)
i was
> > - I guessed it OK? I fear not, because I was unable to generate
> > an unique summary_lp="" in eval_C :-(
>
> hrm, not quite sure what you are trying to do here. don't we already have a
> summary_lp line?
Yes, but I was looking for a method to generate a summary plus a
description whi
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:55:50AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Randolph Chung wrote:
> > modprobe: modprobe: Can't open dependencies file
> > /lib/modules/2.2.17/modules.dep (No such file or directory)
> >
> > I would have sworn we have seen this before and fixed it. It has something
> > to do
Niccolo,
please keep the cc line (to bugs.debian.org) so that we can keep track of
this in the BTS.
> I'd like to release something better, but we are in freeze. Do
> you think we can add some files to the package? I mean a README
> with some guidelines like that:
oh, i thought this was alread
sent to me privately
- Forwarded message from Niccolo Rigacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 09:15:08 +0200
From: "Niccolo Rigacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randolph Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#66578: Module descriptions in modconf
Randolph Chung wrote:
>
Note that I've bonced it to the correct submit address. D'oh.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: 2 Jul 2000, woody
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> It'd be best if you could bug ftp.debian.org about it.
Ok, here goes. For woody, the boot-floppies team has plans to rewrite
the Debian installer from the ground up, converting it to use a modular
architecture in
Randolph Chung wrote:
> modprobe: modprobe: Can't open dependencies file
> /lib/modules/2.2.17/modules.dep (No such file or directory)
>
> I would have sworn we have seen this before and fixed it. It has something
> to do with kmod or something someone on irc reported that booting with
>
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 02:49:15PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> This assumption is false.
Ok. In that case most of my issues about this are not anymore.
> I hink bug1 summed up everything else pretty well. I myself favor his
> option #2; adding a directory to disks-* and putting the debs in there.
14 matches
Mail list logo
