Bruce Sass wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, bug1 wrote:
> > Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, bug1 wrote:
> > > > How and Interim filesystem might work (as i see it)
> > >
> > > Why have an interim fs?
> >
> > 1) To get around any space limitations presented by the boot medium, or
> > r
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, bug1 wrote:
> Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, bug1 wrote:
> > > How and Interim filesystem might work (as i see it)
> >
> > Why have an interim fs?
>
> 1) To get around any space limitations presented by the boot medium, or
> ramdisk.
> It is delaying the pa
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the 2.2.16 source in incoming have Alan's errata patch included?
Yes.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have .deb'ed busybox, but before I upload anything I was wondering... Lintian
> complains about missing man pages on all the apps. How important is it that I
If you put them in a directory such as /usr/lib/busybox, then lintian won't
care about the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 12:59:47AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 03:05:02PM -0400 , Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:03:14PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > there s 2.2.16 kenel in Incoming. Will we go with this one or will we stay at
> > > 2.2.15+patch
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 03:05:02PM -0400 , Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:03:14PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > Hi,
> > there s 2.2.16 kenel in Incoming. Will we go with this one or will we stay at
> > 2.2.15+patch?
>
> Does the 2.2.16 source in incoming have Alan's errata patch in
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:18:39PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> bug1 wrote:
[snip]
> > I dont understand how mklibs.sh works, so this might be a silly idea,
> > but would it be possible to make a library for the modules that only
> > contains parts of the library that the modules binaries require
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Erik Andersen wrote:
> > > Urgh. Gurgle, gurgle. Lets not let this one get out of hand.
> > > Lacking a marketing department, I suggest we keep it simple.
> > > "debian-installer" works for me.
> >
> > I think I prefer it too. B
On Mon Jun 19, 2000 at 01:26:51PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Erik Andersen wrote:
> > I have .deb'ed busybox, but before I upload anything I was wondering... Lintian
> > complains about missing man pages on all the apps. How important is it that I
> > comply with policy for something like BusyBox
Bruce Sass wrote:
> > > onto an existing Debian system. The boot-floppies .deb is not useful to
> > > the average user, but it can still be installed; debinst .debs would be
> > > installed for the same reasons that someone would want to install the
> > > boot-floppies .deb.
> >
> > Ok, but we'
Erik Andersen wrote:
> I have .deb'ed busybox, but before I upload anything I was wondering... Lintian
> complains about missing man pages on all the apps. How important is it that I
> comply with policy for something like BusyBox? I can add in full docs, full
> manpages, do a full set of confl
On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 09:30:04PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 08:13:54PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > That last isn't something that I am going to impose on the rest of you,
> > of course. But I would get pretty grumpy if we just continued incremental
> > improvements
bug1 wrote:
> If we breaking the installer into seperate modules, with binaries in
> seperate modules how are we going to support them with libraries?
>
> Currently we have mklibs.sh to cut down the libraries to only support
> the binaries we need.
>
> Its going to be harder to do that if we have
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 07:03:14PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> Hi,
> there s 2.2.16 kenel in Incoming. Will we go with this one or will we stay at
> 2.2.15+patch?
Does the 2.2.16 source in incoming have Alan's errata patch included?
--
---===-=-==-=---=---
>
> I am only waiting for an updated m68k CD image so that I can burn it. Not
> excatly sure, if any of the previous potato/m68k images has been burned and
> tested, I think we all did only visual inspection...
>
Unfortunately debian-cd got borked, so I haven't made the image yet. It
will be co
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15
Using older boot floppies I destroied my Solaris partition,
because I formatted hda5 thinking it was the Linux native,
instead it was a Solaris slice.
Boot-floppies 2.2.15 solves this bug (#61387), but I think a
little note in "Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know I am violating the rules, but after the arm experiance, I do not
> really dare to upload bf-source.
> To get a quick fix, I applied my changes to the (local) 2.2.15 version
> (changes are checked in now) and built a new 2.2.15 set, whic
Hi,
there s 2.2.16 kenel in Incoming. Will we go with this one or will we stay at
2.2.15+patch?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU\Linux on Win32 systems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 04:15:20PM + , Alexander Koch wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a Pentium III (550 MHz) here, Adaptec (7880) that is
> not booting correctly. It goes to the adaptec setup, all is
> ok, but it hangs (no NumLock change possible any more) there.
so this is the standad kernel. Coul
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 02:32:06PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just burn your own new version (2.2.16) for your port as you see fit.
> I only ask that you announce when you are tagging the source, that you
> tag it properly in CVS (see othe
Hi.
I have a Pentium III (550 MHz) here, Adaptec (7880) that is
not booting correctly. It goes to the adaptec setup, all is
ok, but it hangs (no NumLock change possible any more) there.
If I build a customized boot disc (make zdisk) it works ok,
no problems there. Therefore the question comes up
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 02:23:30PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "Jim" == Jim Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jim> On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 03:27:53PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >> > "Jim" == Jim Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Jim> On Tue, Ju
If we breaking the installer into seperate modules, with binaries in
seperate modules how are we going to support them with libraries?
Currently we have mklibs.sh to cut down the libraries to only support
the binaries we need.
Its going to be harder to do that if we have heaps of different modul
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bruce Sass wrote:
> > It would be very confusing to have .debs that could not be installed
> > onto an existing Debian system. The boot-floppies .deb is not useful to
> > the average user, but it can still be installed; debinst .debs would be
> > installed
>
> At this point, I have *not* read the sources to `slang' and `newt'
> yet. The `newt' documentation is very lacking; there are a lot of
> undocumented features, and thus the source is the documentation right
> now. I imagine I will learn quite a lot from it. School starts
> tuesday, a
On Sun, Jun 18, 2000 at 10:28:41PM -0700 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was booting 'linux verbose debug' at the syslinux 'boot' prompt.
> No install.bat here.
>
> I just installed another machine with the same images, but using a
> different installation method, and it did not have any proble
26 matches
Mail list logo
