Jozef Hitzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> More confusion possible: If you accidentaly insert wrong set of floppies
> (base instead of drivers in my case) it will happily read all the disks
> (11 instead of 3), then of course fail with (not very helpful) "wrong
> drivers.tgz" message.
Yup.
>
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated 13 Jun 2000 01:40:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU boot-floppies 2.2.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> Note: /target/etc/modules.conf is more recent than
>/lib/modules/2.2.15-idepci/modules.dep
> modprobe: Can't locate module serial
>
> Installation failed.
>
> The solution was to:
> cd /lib
> mv modules modules.old
> ln -s /target/lib/mo
reassign 65412 samba
thanks
Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> when you shut down, the network interface shuts down before the
> drives are unmounted. normally this wouldn't be a problem, but the
> samba shares are left 'til after the network interface goes down
> too, which causes a hang
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have all of these (plus many other things) fixed in my
> local CVS tree. Do the powers that be want me to check
> my fixes into the boot floppies CVS tree?
Naw... this is really just a cosmetic problem, if you ask me. Not
worth it. We need to foc
I spoke too soon... This bug might still be present.
It does stop if you push Enter while a transfer is running. But
perhaps if the transfer hangs, there's a point where it cannot be
interrupted currently.
Will someone please lend a hand and check for this? Look up the bug
in BTS.
--
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It does look like switching to kernel 2.2.16 would be a worthwhile
> thing, since there were a bunch of security warnings vs 2.2.15 when
> .16 was released this morning...
It seems we've backported the security issues and are sticking with
2.2.15, to w
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Try using "linux video=vc:8" on "boot:" prompt of the rescue floppy.
I added a string in f5.txt about this.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
If I use net-fetch to get base2_2.tgz, and stop it in the middle,
then attempt to resume it, the zcat | tar command fails.
When I go over to vt2 and zcat the /target/tmp/base2_2.tgz, I get
errors that say:
invalid compressed data--format violated
invalid compressed data--crc error
inv
On Fri Jun 09, 2000 at 03:42:12PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > /*
> > * Check if we are done writing to the file now.
> > */
> > if (dataCc <= 0 && tostdoutFlag == FALSE) {
> > struct utimbuf utb;
> >
> > if (close(outFd))
> > perror(outName);
> >
>
PPPoE = PPP over Ethernet. It's the connection method icnreasingly being
imposed on home DSL users by their ISPs (PacBell and Bell Atlantic are two
big DSL providers inflicting it on their new customers).
Here in the West, PacBell provides its own (proprietary, binary only) PPPoE
stuff for Linux
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What bugs in the current boot-floppies BusyBox need to be fixed?
> Probably just the tar bug. Other things, such as Bug #64576
> are not really critical.
I agree with that. I mean, the busybox changelog you offered the link
to does look
"Oliver Elphick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The section on split packages should be amended by including the
> following information about postgresql:
Oliver, it looks like someone already got this.
People, I wish you would mail the list when you've handled
something... it wastes my time oth
On Tue Jun 13, 2000 at 01:02:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> hashao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is it possible to include PPPoE in the base2_2.tgz? More and more
> > ISP provide wide band internet access throught PPPoE now. And people
> > using PPPoE tents to install Debian through
Joey, i have some ideas of how woody boot floppies could work and would
like to see how close they are to yours, or what are the curent plans
for woody?
Some things ive been thinking are
base.tgz could be created on the fly if someone has access to the debian
archive.
An intermediate install co
Michael Agbaglo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This controller is supported by 2.3.x series - what is the easiest way
> to install Debian ? Can I replace the kernel on rescue disk, will this
> be sufficient ?
I don't know... it's unsupported. I suggest installing with a support
SCSI card. Hopef
hashao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to include PPPoE in the base2_2.tgz? More and more
> ISP provide wide band internet access throught PPPoE now. And people
> using PPPoE tents to install Debian through network.
I have no idea. What is PPPoE? Is it packaged and in Debian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I didn't know if I should reply directly to you or to the list,
To the list.
> please let me know. The filenames on the Linux side were truncated.
> In particular when the first reboot takes place it looks for
> dpkg-reconfigure, that file couldn't be found. The sc
On Mon Jun 12, 2000 at 09:13:30PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>
> I just commited changes to `dbootstrap' that make it so you can push
> `Ctrl-C' to break out of a failing DNS lookup and the subsequent
> `connect()' in "http-fetch.c", and from an attempting NFS mount in
> "choose_medium.c"
I just commited changes to `dbootstrap' that make it so you can push
`Ctrl-C' to break out of a failing DNS lookup and the subsequent
`connect()' in "http-fetch.c", and from an attempting NFS mount in
"choose_medium.c".
Yes, I'm an escapist. ;-)
--
A few months in the laboratory often sav
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15
Severity: normal
Note: /target/etc/modules.conf is more recent than
/lib/modules/2.2.15-idepci/modules.dep
modprobe: Can't locate module serial
Installation failed.
The solution was to:
cd /lib
mv modules modules.old
ln -s /target/lib/modules m
"Karl M. Hegbloom" wrote:
> Joey Hess has started a design document for the Woody
> installation system. Look in the archives for it.
>
In CVS? could you please give a few more pointers as to where it is.
I looked but i didnt really know where to look or what to look for.
Thanks
Glenn
--
Hello debian-boot,
Is it possible to include PPPoE in the base2_2.tgz? More and more
ISP provide wide band internet access throught PPPoE now. And people
using PPPoE tents to install Debian through network.
--
Best regards,
hashao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This controller is supported by 2.3.x series - what is the easiest way
to install Debian ? Can I replace the kernel on rescue disk, will this
be sufficient ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15-2000-06-07
> dbootstrap should check for "mixed" installs (using kernel from vanilla
> and drivers from idepci, for example) and refuse to install them (or at
> least warn) or we're gonna gets *lost* of confusion from newbies.
More confusion possible: If yo
> "Marcel" == Marcel Harkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcel> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 21:50 +0200, Marcel Harkema wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 22:32 -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
>>
>> > > When you're downloading the base system via dbootstrap and realize the
>> >
> "Michael" == Michael Agbaglo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Under solaris thing are quite simple: You can set thing up that
Michael> partition your HD as you like install the OS and myabe other software...
Michael> I haven't seen thing like this under solaris especially D
45 matches
Mail list logo
