Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would tend to discourage maintainers of non-free packages from seeking
> out additional porter builds at the last minute before release. If the
Oops, sorry. Here's hoping the following release will happen soon
enough that I still remember that. ;-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:10:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:22:54PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > For instance, until I built bsdgames-nonfree 2.16-1 (aka rogue) for
> > several of the outstanding architectures myself just now, it was up to
> > date only for my ow
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:22:54PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> One issue that we may wish to address before releasing sarge is that
> some arch-dependent non-free packages are behind because the
> autobuilders only touch main and porters only sporadically build them
> for their architectures.
>
One issue that we may wish to address before releasing sarge is that
some arch-dependent non-free packages are behind because the
autobuilders only touch main and porters only sporadically build them
for their architectures.
For instance, until I built bsdgames-nonfree 2.16-1 (aka rogue) for
sever
4 matches
Mail list logo