Re: synching non-free packages for sarge

2004-08-14 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would tend to discourage maintainers of non-free packages from seeking > out additional porter builds at the last minute before release. If the Oops, sorry. Here's hoping the following release will happen soon enough that I still remember that. ;-)

Re: synching non-free packages for sarge

2004-08-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:10:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:22:54PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > For instance, until I built bsdgames-nonfree 2.16-1 (aka rogue) for > > several of the outstanding architectures myself just now, it was up to > > date only for my ow

Re: synching non-free packages for sarge

2004-08-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:22:54PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > One issue that we may wish to address before releasing sarge is that > some arch-dependent non-free packages are behind because the > autobuilders only touch main and porters only sporadically build them > for their architectures. >

synching non-free packages for sarge

2004-08-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
One issue that we may wish to address before releasing sarge is that some arch-dependent non-free packages are behind because the autobuilders only touch main and porters only sporadically build them for their architectures. For instance, until I built bsdgames-nonfree 2.16-1 (aka rogue) for sever