Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Partly. Intel has recently released a new generation of their IOP
chips and I hope we can get some 1.2 GHz evaluation boards eventually.
That would certainly help.
If you do, send one my way. I'd be happy to babysit it. :)
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurelien:
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Would a faster buildd, such as the one offered by Bill Gatliff [1], fix
the problem of build resources?
Bill, any news from debian-admin?
Nope.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-15 11:24]:
> > It's a problem of build resources. I won't enable the Qemu kernel
>
> Would a faster buildd, such as the one offered by Bill Gatliff [1], fix
> the problem of build resources?
Partly. Intel has recently released a new generation of th
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-13 14:04]:
>> As of now, no official ARM flavour can run in qemu, which prevents
>> us from using what could be an extremely cheap and easy to deploy
>> development platform. Qemu however supports the versatile platform, and
>>
* Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-14 11:57]:
> Maybe we could get rid of flavours that are less important?
Yes, but certainly not before etch is out. If we drop flavours, we
should do it properly, i.e. document it in the release notes and drop
them _after_ the release. This is what I in
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> It's a problem of build resources. I won't enable the Qemu kernel
> image for etch because the ARM kernels already takes about 2 days to
> build. I'll re-evaluate the flavours we're building on ARM after
> etch. Since the RiscPC kernel will be dro
* Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-13 14:04]:
> As of now, no official ARM flavour can run in qemu, which prevents
> us from using what could be an extremely cheap and easy to deploy
> development platform. Qemu however supports the versatile platform, and
> adding a kernel for it to the ar
Wookey a écrit :
> On 2006-12-13 14:04 +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>>Hi there.
>>
>>As of now, no official ARM flavour can run in qemu, which prevents
>> us from using what could be an extremely cheap and easy to deploy
>> development platform. Qemu however supports the versatile platform, an
On 2006-12-13 14:04 +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>Hi there.
>
>As of now, no official ARM flavour can run in qemu, which prevents
> us from using what could be an extremely cheap and easy to deploy
> development platform. Qemu however supports the versatile platform, and
> adding a kernel for
Hi there.
As of now, no official ARM flavour can run in qemu, which prevents
us from using what could be an extremely cheap and easy to deploy
development platform. Qemu however supports the versatile platform, and
adding a kernel for it to the archive is just, as far as I understand, a
matt
10 matches
Mail list logo
