Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-13 Thread Wookey
On 2016-10-13 15:56 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2016-10-13 15:52, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > >On 2016-10-13 15:48, Wookey wrote: > >> > >>OK. Yep, just rebuilding gdal (and installing the resulting > >>libgdal-dev, libgdal20), fixes the postgis configure. > > Can you schedule a dep-wait for lib

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/13/2016 04:37 PM, Wookey wrote: > On 2016-10-13 15:56 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: OK. Yep, just rebuilding gdal (and installing the resulting libgdal-dev, libgdal20), fixes the postgis configure. I'll schedule a binNMU. >>> >>> Thanks for the confirmation. A binNMU won't

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-13 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2016-10-13 15:52, Bas Couwenberg wrote: On 2016-10-13 15:48, Wookey wrote: On 2016-10-12 18:57 +0100, Wookey wrote: On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > than postgis, although why the configure behavi

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-13 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2016-10-13 15:48, Wookey wrote: On 2016-10-12 18:57 +0100, Wookey wrote: On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > than postgis, although why the configure behaviour has changd > > remains a mystery. > > Th

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-13 Thread Wookey
On 2016-10-12 18:57 +0100, Wookey wrote: > On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > > than postgis, although why the configure behaviour has changd > > > remains a mystery. > > > > The configure behaviour i

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-12 Thread peter green
On 12/10/16 18:57, Wookey wrote: That seems quite likely. It might just be the senstivity of C++ symbols to compiler changes. Unfortunately so far as I know one can't test such a thing on the porter boxes (because there is no way to unstall the local gdal you just built due to lack of root rights

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-12 Thread Wookey
On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > than postgis, although why the configure behaviour has changd > > remains a mystery. > > The configure behaviour is weird indeed. On the other architectures > "none requ

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Wookey, Thanks for looking into this issue. On 10/11/2016 05:46 AM, Wookey wrote: > On 2016-10-10 21:50 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Dear arm64 porters, >> >> The postgis (2.3.0+dfsg-3) upload is failing to build to arm64 because >> its configure check for GDAL failed, specifically:

Re: postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-10 Thread Wookey
On 2016-10-10 21:50 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Dear arm64 porters, > > The postgis (2.3.0+dfsg-3) upload is failing to build to arm64 because > its configure check for GDAL failed, specifically: > > AC_SEARCH_LIBS([GDALAllRegister], [gdal], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([could not > find GDAL])], [

postgis failing to build on arm64 only

2016-10-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Dear arm64 porters, The postgis (2.3.0+dfsg-3) upload is failing to build to arm64 because its configure check for GDAL failed, specifically: AC_SEARCH_LIBS([GDALAllRegister], [gdal], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([could not find GDAL])], []) I can reproduce this issue on the the arm64 porterbox, where I a