Re: page fault in mkfontdir

2001-03-02 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (CCed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Mark> oops, should have looked, bug 82601 is already open (says > Mark> sparc only, though) and that it is probably due to some > Mark> other lib, not mkfontdir code itself

Re: page fault in mkfontdir

2001-02-18 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Mark" == Mark W Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> oops, should have looked, bug 82601 is already open (says Mark> sparc only, though) and that it is probably due to some Mark> other lib, not mkfontdir code itself. It says sparc only cause that's all I have. Nice to see i

Re: page fault in mkfontdir

2001-02-18 Thread Mark W. Eichin
oops, should have looked, bug 82601 is already open (says sparc only, though) and that it is probably due to some other lib, not mkfontdir code itself. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=82601 They point out that this: required from libc.so.6: 0x0d696911 0x00 05 GLIBC_2.1

Re: page fault in mkfontdir

2001-02-18 Thread Mark W. Eichin
I'll note that the xutils 4.0.2-1 mkfontdir also segv's on Debian/SPARC using 2.2.18pre21 (kernel-image-2.2.18pre21-sun4cdm) so maybe it really is an "all the world is an x86" bug :-) Setting up xfonts-base (4.0.2-1) ... Running mkfontdir in misc font directory.../var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-base.pos

page fault in mkfontdir

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Naulls
I'm seeing this: Feb 17 14:41:32 bug kernel: mkfontdir: unhandled page fault at pc=0x, lr =0x40050bd4 (bad address=0x, code 0) Feb 17 14:41:57 bug last message repeated 9 times Which afflicts itself during install of xfont packages - I've filed a bug against one of the xfont pac