Re: ongoing build problems with fityk on arm

2006-09-29 Thread Wookey
On 06-09-28 21:49 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Wookey wrote: > > >On 06-09-17 10:52 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > >> > >>The question is this. Is fityk really a package that is useful for the > >>arm architecture? Only those who use arm can tell me this. If it isn't > >>maybe

Re: ongoing build problems with fityk on arm

2006-09-28 Thread Carlo Segre
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Wookey wrote: On 06-09-17 10:52 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: The question is this. Is fityk really a package that is useful for the arm architecture? Only those who use arm can tell me this. If it isn't maybe I should exclude arm from the architecture list or the package c

Re: ongoing build problems with fityk on arm

2006-09-28 Thread Wookey
On 06-09-17 10:52 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > > Hello All: > > I am continuing to have problems with fityk timing out on the arm buildd. > The package takes a lot of resources to compile (up to 300M or RAM for > some files) and the resulting binary is an X11 program. > > I have been working wi

ongoing build problems with fityk on arm

2006-09-17 Thread Carlo Segre
Hello All: I am continuing to have problems with fityk timing out on the arm buildd. The package takes a lot of resources to compile (up to 300M or RAM for some files) and the resulting binary is an X11 program. I have been working with upstream to solve some optimization problems with the