Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Paolo, Thank you for your work investigating this. On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:22:34PM +0100, Paolo Molaro wrote: > If I am given access to elara I can try to reproduce that, but it didn't > happen in jitted code and it didn't happen in the 6 builds I ran today > on other boxes: if it's a bug i

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-17 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 11/16/06 Paolo Molaro wrote: > > He has netwinders, cats, etc machines available. All of them are arm > > v4l, which seemed to me to be the relevant thing here. > > I have contacted Bdale already, I'll mail Vince shortly anyway: > having two boxes likely increases the chance to hit the bug if

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-16 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 11/16/06 Stephen Gran wrote: > > > Contact Vince Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for access to arm machines for > > > build tests. I have told him to expect an email from you. > > > > He has a netwinder that he's granting access to? A shell account on a > > machine where the build failure doesn't

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:16:21PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Paolo Molaro said: > > > I build regularly on my arm box (xscale v5l) on debian and run a few > > > tests. > > > There should be nothing major that wou

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:32 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > The > 'netwinder' buildd is hosted by Bdale Garbee, though; maybe he could give > Paolo access to that one? Sure. Paolo, send me details and we'll get you set up. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:16:21PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Paolo Molaro said: > > I build regularly on my arm box (xscale v5l) on debian and run a few tests. > > There should be nothing major that would prevent running mono apps, > > though of course bugs may and d

Re: Bug#394418: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Paolo Molaro said: > I build regularly on my arm box (xscale v5l) on debian and run a few tests. > There should be nothing major that would prevent running mono apps, > though of course bugs may and do exist as in any other software. > To debug what is the issue I'd nee

Re: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 11/15/06 Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 04:40 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > But does anyone understand yet *why* this bug affects the netwinders and not > > the cats boxes? > > Not really. My best guess is that it's a subtle timing issue of some > kind and shows up on the netw

Re: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:57:48PM +, Wookey wrote: > > So where does that leave us for etch? Does a mono that doesn't run on > > netwinders and apparently not on smackdown either, but does run on other > > cats systems, make the grade for release? If no one has time to investigate > > the pr

Re: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-15 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 04:40 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > But does anyone understand yet *why* this bug affects the netwinders and not > the cats boxes? Not really. My best guess is that it's a subtle timing issue of some kind and shows up on the netwinders because they're slightly faster. Or, a

Re: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-14 Thread Wookey
On 2006-11-10 16:21 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Phil, > > > At a first glance this looks more like a TLS emulation kind of problem > > than an instruction set discrepancy. But it'd take a bit more detective > > work to figure out what's really going wrong, and I guess there is no > > guaran

Re: mono_1.1.18-3 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: SIGSEGV

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Phil, > At a first glance this looks more like a TLS emulation kind of problem > than an instruction set discrepancy. But it'd take a bit more detective > work to figure out what's really going wrong, and I guess there is no > guarantee that this is the same problem the netwinders are seeing i