On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>>> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
>>> > appropriate Debian kernel flavour and then integrated into the stan
Ian Campbell writes:
Hi,
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
>> > appropriate Debian kernel flavour and then integrated into the standard
>> > d-i images. If there is upstream support then this ough
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
>> > appropriate Debian kernel flavour and then integrated into the standard
>> > d-i images. If there is upstr
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:48 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
> > But the obvious answer here is to get support for your device into the
> > appropriate Debian kernel flavour and then integrated into the standard
> > d-i images. If there is upstream support then this ought to be more or
> > less trivial.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> yea... i modified it to add DEBUG_BOOT=3 so that i could get in,
>> then followed it through. /init is mounting /proc which then causes
>> /sbin/init to fail to mount
> so there's something really odd going on.
Any more odd than Canonical branding making its way into the 7.0.0
release? (I think I've still got the screenshot.)
Respectfully,
rl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> yea... i modified it to add DEBUG_BOOT=3 so that i could get in,
> then followed it through. /init is mounting /proc which then causes
> /sbin/init to fail to mount /proc.
>
> so there's something really odd going on.
I
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> bizarre. ok, so the question is: what's a /init doing in the
>> debian-installer initramfs, particularly as they're completely
>> different?
>
> /init is in my desktop i
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> bizarre. ok, so the question is: what's a /init doing in the
> debian-installer initramfs, particularly as they're completely
> different?
/init is in my desktop initramfs too, but not on the rootfs. It looks
like a script
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2013-05-20 15:22 +0100]:
>> but also, this is /sbin/init rather than /init - which one should
>> really be executed (as process 1) - both exist.
>
> /sbin/init exists on a standard debian wheezy (or ubuntu raring)
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2013-05-20 15:22 +0100]:
> but also, this is /sbin/init rather than /init - which one should
> really be executed (as process 1) - both exist.
/sbin/init exists on a standard debian wheezy (or ubuntu raring)
rootfs. /init doesn't.
Wookey
--
Principal hats:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 23:54 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> woo! how exciting! and novel. having serial console access to boot log.
>>
>> Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
>> pivot_root: Invalid argument
>> <0>Kernel pa
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 23:54 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> woo! how exciting! and novel. having serial console access to boot log.
>
> Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
> pivot_root: Invalid argument
> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0100
woo! how exciting! and novel. having serial console access to boot log.
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...
pivot_root: Invalid argument
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0100
ahh, i am sooo happy to see that. an error message. a real live error message
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ luke.leighton [2013-05-19 10:37 +0100]:
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> >
>> > Sounds like you want a network-console flavour image, like the ones used
>> > for kirkwood, http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-
+++ luke.leighton [2013-05-19 10:37 +0100]:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like you want a network-console flavour image, like the ones used
> > for kirkwood, http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-41x/install/
>
> it does, doesn't it? i've been thi
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I don't know if the password thing is because ssh just doesn't let you
> use no password or if it's because the normal use case here is on
> regular Ethernet. In any case it doesn't seem like a blocker for a first
> pass and could likely be
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Patard
wrote:
> "luke.leighton" writes:
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
* create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
*blind* (no con
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 10:37 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
> >> * create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
> >> *blind* (no console!!) which gets far enough on its
"luke.leighton" writes:
Hi,
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>>> * create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
>>> *blind* (no console!!) which gets far enough on its own to do DHCP
>>> client
>>
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> * create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
>> *blind* (no console!!) which gets far enough on its own to do DHCP
>> client
>>
>> * also pre-install some sort of
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:18 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
> * create a modified netinst-initrd that uses usb0 ethernet gadget
> *blind* (no console!!) which gets far enough on its own to do DHCP
> client
>
> * also pre-install some sort of service (ssh? busybox telnet? other?)
> which allows an inte
i've started a page here which is the notes being collated to get this done:
http://rhombus-tech.net/allwinner_a10/debian_netboot/
l.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://li
i got debian/armhf up and running on the a10-eoma68 board, but i'd
like to make it easier for other people to install debian on it. the
generally-proven method "go download some whopping great 1gbyte random
image off the internet with packages preinstalled that you don't
actually want" is pretty s
24 matches
Mail list logo
