Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I'm currently building 1.0.4-2, but if -1 doesn't work, then is there hope for
> -2? Maybe when it's built with the new compiler/toolchain?
Nope, -2 fails in the same way... :-(
I'll keep building packages, and debsign their .changes and upload all at once
when gpg wor
Hello,
The current gpg binary in unstable (1.0.4-1) isn't working for me, on a
Netwinder with a 2.4.1 kernel from lkab. I just tried to sign a .changes for
a binary upload, and it asked for the passphrase thrice and failed. Then
I tried verifying a detached sig I had made on an Intel box, which
2 matches
Mail list logo
