Re: galeon builds

2004-01-23 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 08:24, Mark Howard wrote: > Hi, > An attempt has been made to build galeon on arm and it was successful. > Thank you to whoever it was that enabled this - galeon may now finally > go back into testing. Great! Would still appreciate any help anyone can give regarding the re

Re: galeon builds

2004-01-23 Thread Mark Howard
Hi, An attempt has been made to build galeon on arm and it was successful. Thank you to whoever it was that enabled this - galeon may now finally go back into testing. On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:25:16PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > I don't know for sure how the autobuilders work, but the f

Re: galeon builds

2004-01-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 20:26, Joe Buck wrote: I second this request; the only thing keeping meta-gnome2 out of testing is the lack of galeon on arm; every single other dependency is already in. I don't know for sure how the autobuilders work, but the fact that mozilla-browser ca

Re: galeon builds

2004-01-22 Thread Joe Buck
I second this request; the only thing keeping meta-gnome2 out of testing is the lack of galeon on arm; every single other dependency is already in.

galeon builds

2004-01-16 Thread Mark Howard
Hi, Is there any chance that somebody on this list could hint wanna-build to try building arm on galeon again? Recent versions of mozilla have been building so there's a good chance that galeon will now build successfully. Galeon builds haven't been attempted since the last build in

galeon builds

2003-11-27 Thread Mark Howard
Hi, Mozilla now seems to be building again on arm, so would it be possible to start trying to build galeon again please? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signat