Re: dropbox/armel

2011-12-02 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:05:24PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > On 12/01/2011 07:59 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > it looks rather that non-free component is the artwork. > > No, it's the non-free, architecture-dependent blob that it fetches from > the web and executes on your behalf

Re: dropbox/armel

2011-12-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 12/01/2011 07:59 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:29:50AM +1100, Matt Palmer a écrit : >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:11:37PM +0200, Victor Nitu wrote: >>> Anybody here to report any success/attempt to package dropbox for armel? >> >> It's non-free, which strongly suggests i

Re: dropbox/armel

2011-12-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:29:50AM +1100, Matt Palmer a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:11:37PM +0200, Victor Nitu wrote: > > Anybody here to report any success/attempt to package dropbox for armel? > > It's non-free, which strongly suggests it's some sort of binary-only blob, > and only prov

Re: dropbox/armel

2011-12-01 Thread Matt Palmer
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:11:37PM +0200, Victor Nitu wrote: > Anybody here to report any success/attempt to package dropbox for armel? It's non-free, which strongly suggests it's some sort of binary-only blob, and only provides pre-compiled binaries for the architectures it already supports. - M

dropbox/armel

2011-12-01 Thread Victor Nitu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Anybody here to report any success/attempt to package dropbox for armel? Here's the output I find not too discouraging: # apt-cache depends nautilus-dropbox nautilus-dropbox Depends: procps Depends: python-gtk2 Depends: python-gpgme