On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:44:31PM +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
> While "linux-i386" in Debian currently means "i486",
> a "w32-i386" should stand for "i586".
Why? Win NT 3.x ran fine on a 386 (with enough ram), and many windows
32bit systems ran on 486's. Perhaps Win 2k or XP requires a pentium
Dear Developers,
it's interesting to see the dicussion reappear which I started
last year. In that time dpkg-architecture was too inflexible
and I fear that's still the case. Anyway, I'll try to summarize
the problems I encountered.
In the last year I performed an intensive research for some
week
[ Please use my debian address as I prefer to use that hat for dpkg
stuff. ]
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 00:03:30 +, Wookey wrote:
> I noticed that dpkg-cross didn't automatically recognise armel when
> provided with an updated dpkg-architecture.
>
> This is because it has its own table of d
I noticed that dpkg-cross didn't automatically recognise armel when
provided with an updated dpkg-architecture.
This is because it has its own table of debian->gnu arch names:
'i386' => 'i486-linux-gnu',
'sparc' => 'sparc-linux-gnu',
4 matches
Mail list logo
