Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-12 Thread Philip Blundell
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in >/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour >process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that >makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the >other processors, is Little En

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Tor Slettnes
> "Peter" == Peter Maydell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> I tried putting together some patches based on a Peter> combination of the 3.x ARM patches and the 4.0 patches for Peter> other non-x86 architectures; it's now falling over with a Peter> compile error in elfloader.c.

Re: building xfree86 4 for debian/arm

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Maydell
Branden Robinson wrote: >On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:09:51PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: >> # remove the upstream symlink X -> XFree86 >> This symlink does not exist because the XFree86 server binary was not built >> in the first place and therefore no symlink was created. > >That's bad. >> [Would