On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 10:00 +0100, Rieker Flaik wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 07:27 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:10:49 +0100
> > Rieker Flaik wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 16:34 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:28:17 +0100
> > > > Riek
2013/2/12 Neil Williams :
> That doesn't help with the problem that the default Debian build only
> supports Xorg and most boards are actually going to require QtEmbedded
> and framebuffer support. If you've only got 256MB of RAM, Xorg is
> seriously painful.
The Qt5 on Debian will btw build the f
peter green wrote (ao):
> Sander wrote:
> >I believe the Armbrix Zero sells for $145
> >It has the same cpu and memory as the Arndale (Cortex-A15 1.7GHz dual
> >core, 2GB 800MHz DDR3, and sata3), just a little less connectors:
> >
> >http://howchip.com/shop/item.php?it_id=BRIX5250
>
> It's also on
On 2013-02-12 at 17:04:29 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> That doesn't help with the problem that the default Debian build only
> supports Xorg and most boards are actually going to require QtEmbedded
> and framebuffer support. If you've only got 256MB of RAM, Xorg is
> seriously painful.
is it? My
Rieker Flaik wrote:
How do you do that?
Any hints?
One option worth considering is running qemu in user mode though
binfmt_support. This has lower overheads than full hardware emulation
and will be able to use multiple host CPUs for paralell builds (since
each process runs in a seperate emu
Sander wrote:
I believe the Armbrix Zero sells for $145
It has the same cpu and memory as the Arndale (Cortex-A15 1.7GHz dual
core, 2GB 800MHz DDR3, and sata3), just a little less connectors:
http://howchip.com/shop/item.php?it_id=BRIX5250
It's also on a three month lead time and has had virtual
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:51:53 +0100
martinwguy wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 17:36, Sander wrote:
> > Ermis Papastefanakis wrote (ao):
> >> I agree with Martin, it's better to compile Debian packages natively. I
> >> would suggest to get something more powerful though. A dual core board like
> >>
Ermis Papastefanakis wrote (ao):
> I agree with Martin, it's better to compile Debian packages natively. I
> would suggest to get something more powerful though. A dual core board like
> a Pandaboard ES (1.2GHz) or a Snowball (1GHz) can come rather cheap
> (150-200euros) and are pretty decent for s
On 12 February 2013 17:36, Sander wrote:
> Ermis Papastefanakis wrote (ao):
>> I agree with Martin, it's better to compile Debian packages natively. I
>> would suggest to get something more powerful though. A dual core board like
>> a Pandaboard ES (1.2GHz) or a Snowball (1GHz) can come rather che
Hello,
I agree with Martin, it's better to compile Debian packages natively. I
would suggest to get something more powerful though. A dual core board like
a Pandaboard ES (1.2GHz) or a Snowball (1GHz) can come rather cheap
(150-200euros) and are pretty decent for such a task.
Ermis
On Tue, Feb
On 12 February 2013 16:28, Rieker Flaik wrote:
> I'm running debian arm and need to rebuild libqt4 with an additional
> patch. What is the best and fastest way to rebuild that package?
Build it on an ARM box, as Debian packages (in general) need to build
on native hardware.
>
> I also want to me
Hi all
I'm running debian arm and need to rebuild libqt4 with an additional
patch. What is the best and fastest way to rebuild that package?
I also want to mention that I already tried several ways (cross-compile
and qemu):
1. cross-compile:
I have installed the emdebian toolchain by doing:
12 matches
Mail list logo
