Re: armel and armhf build failures in GNU R related packages

On 9 April 2012 at 00:49, peter green wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > I could pass it on. The main configure / m4 developer is quite knowledgeable | > and responsive but without a reference system ... this gets quite tedious | > quite quickly. | Debian has porterboxes available for both arme

Re: armel and armhf build failures in GNU R related packages

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: I could pass it on. The main configure / m4 developer is quite knowledgeable and responsive but without a reference system ... this gets quite tedious quite quickly. Debian has porterboxes available for both armel and armhf (abel and agricola for armel, harris for armhf)

Re: armel and armhf build failures in GNU R related packages

On 8 April 2012 at 23:40, peter green wrote: | A number of GNU R related packages are failing on armel and armhf with | errors like | | gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -o msmSHLIB_EXT analyticp.o hmm.o lik.o pijt.o -llapack -lblas -lgfortran -lm SHLIB_LIBADD -L/usr/lib/R/lib -lR | gcc: error: SHLIB_LIBA

armel and armhf build failures in GNU R related packages

A number of GNU R related packages are failing on armel and armhf with errors like gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -o msmSHLIB_EXT analyticp.o hmm.o lik.o pijt.o -llapack -lblas -lgfortran -lm SHLIB_LIBADD -L/usr/lib/R/lib -lR gcc: error: SHLIB_LIBADD: No such file or directory https://buildd.debian.or